An overall inequality reducing and horizontally equitable tax system with application to Polish data
AbstractA population of households is considered and each household is distinguished by two attributes: pre-tax income and family size. To compare incomes in this heterogeneous environment an affine transformation is proposed as equivalent income function, from which income dependent equivalence scales are derived. By first, the horizontal equity concern of a tax system has to be faced. Ebert and Lambert (2004) define horizontal equity requirements for income dependent scales. Applying the proposed scales a tax system can be derived and we show that it satisfies the horizontal equity conditions as defined by two authors. Then, we consider the redistributive effects of a tax system by introducing an inequality parameterized measure as in Ebert and Moyes (2000). We show that, when the reference type family is fixed, the application of the suggested equivalence income function is such that the tax system can be overall inequality reducing provided that the reference type tax function is average rate or minimal progressive. As it is known, conditions ensuring that a tax system is overall inequality reducing are not sufficient to guarantee inequality reduction within each set of households with the same size. We derive restrictions which allow the equivalent income function to generate a tax system which is overall inequality reducing and within type inequality reducing. These restrictions concern the tax function for the reference family type and the domain of incomes. To see where these restrictions come from, it is important to note that a tax system which is overall inequality reducing for a fixed reference may well increase inequality (or keep it unaltered) when another reference type is chosen. But, if a tax system is within type inequality reducing, it is also overall inequality reducing for any reference type. Ebert and Moyes (2000) show that only two particular form of equivalence function can be adopted when reference independence is required. The first function yields an income independent absolute scale; the second function yields an income independent relative. The former has to be used when inequality is considered from the absolute point of view, the latter has to be used when an intermediate between absolute and relative concept of inequality is adopted or when relative inequality is considered. Here we suggest only an income transformation function which originates income depending scales. On considering inequality either in absolute or in relative sense, using this function we obtain a tax system which is overall inequality reducing and reference independent if some restrictions hold on income domain, on the set of taxable income and on the tax function for the reference type: we think that these restrictions are not too limitative as it can be understood from the applicative part. The paper is organized as follows. In the first part, following Ebert-Lambert (2004), horizontal equity (HE) conditions are defined in both cases when equivalence scales are income dependent or income independent. Then, following Ebert-Moyes (2000), we summarize what has to be meant for an overall inequality reducing tax system (OIR), for a within type inequality reducing (WIR) tax system and for a reference independent tax system (RI). In the second part the paper we describe the particular affine income transformation function that we adopt and we investigate on the conditions allowing to this function to generate a tax system which is OIR and WIR. In the third part we simulate modifications to the present personal income tax in Poland, with the aim to design a more family oriented system. The paper is completed by an appendix which analyzes the relation among the most important instruments used in the real world to take into account horizontal equity. Quotient, exemption and tax credit are discussed under different hypotheses on tax function.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano in its series Departmental Working Papers with number 2006-15.
Date of creation: 08 May 2006
Date of revision:
Family Taxation; Horizontal Equity; Vertical Equity; Overall inequality reduction; Family quotient; Exemptions; Tax credit;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
- H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
- H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
- I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fellman, J, 1976. "The Effect of Transformations on Lorenz Curves," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(4), pages 823-24, July.
- Dagum, Camilo, 1980. "Inequality Measures between Income Distributions with Applications," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(7), pages 1791-1803, November.
- Udo Ebert, 2000. "Equivalizing Incomes: A Normative Approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer, vol. 7(6), pages 619-640, December.
- Donaldson, D. & Pendakur, K., 1999. "Equivalent-Income Functions and Income-Dependent Equivalence Scales," Discussion Papers dp99-8, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Chen, Chau-Nan & Tsaur, Tien-Wang & Rhai, Tong-Shieng, 1982. "The Gini Coefficient and Negative Income," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 473-78, November.
- Dagum, Camilo, 1987. "Measuring the Economic Affluence between Populations of Income Receivers," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 5(1), pages 5-12, January.
- Ebert, Udo & Moyes, Patrick, 2000. "Consistent Income Tax Structures When Households Are Heterogeneous," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 116-150, January.
- Bossert, Walter & Pfingsten, Andreas, 1990. "Intermediate inequality: concepts, indices, and welfare implications," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 117-134, April.
- Udo Ebert & Peter J. Lambert, 2004.
"Horizontal Equity and Progression When Equivalence Scales Are Not Constant,"
Public Finance Review,
, vol. 32(4), pages 426-440, July.
- Udo Ebert & Peter J Lambert, . "Horizontal Equity and Progession when Equivalence Scales are not Constant," Discussion Papers 02/02, Department of Economics, University of York.
- Dagum, Camilo, 1997. "A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 515-31.
- Fei, John C H, 1981. "Equity Oriented Fiscal Programs," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 869-81, June.
- Kolm, Serge-Christophe, 1976. "Unequal inequalities. I," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 416-442, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.