Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

An overall inequality reducing and horizontally equitable tax system with application to Polish data

Contents:

Author Info

  • Achille VERNIZZI

    ()

  • Maria Giovanna MONTI

    ()

  • Marek KOSNY

    ()

Abstract

A population of households is considered and each household is distinguished by two attributes: pre-tax income and family size. To compare incomes in this heterogeneous environment an affine transformation is proposed as equivalent income function, from which income dependent equivalence scales are derived. By first, the horizontal equity concern of a tax system has to be faced. Ebert and Lambert (2004) define horizontal equity requirements for income dependent scales. Applying the proposed scales a tax system can be derived and we show that it satisfies the horizontal equity conditions as defined by two authors. Then, we consider the redistributive effects of a tax system by introducing an inequality parameterized measure as in Ebert and Moyes (2000). We show that, when the reference type family is fixed, the application of the suggested equivalence income function is such that the tax system can be overall inequality reducing provided that the reference type tax function is average rate or minimal progressive. As it is known, conditions ensuring that a tax system is overall inequality reducing are not sufficient to guarantee inequality reduction within each set of households with the same size. We derive restrictions which allow the equivalent income function to generate a tax system which is overall inequality reducing and within type inequality reducing. These restrictions concern the tax function for the reference family type and the domain of incomes. To see where these restrictions come from, it is important to note that a tax system which is overall inequality reducing for a fixed reference may well increase inequality (or keep it unaltered) when another reference type is chosen. But, if a tax system is within type inequality reducing, it is also overall inequality reducing for any reference type. Ebert and Moyes (2000) show that only two particular form of equivalence function can be adopted when reference independence is required. The first function yields an income independent absolute scale; the second function yields an income independent relative. The former has to be used when inequality is considered from the absolute point of view, the latter has to be used when an intermediate between absolute and relative concept of inequality is adopted or when relative inequality is considered. Here we suggest only an income transformation function which originates income depending scales. On considering inequality either in absolute or in relative sense, using this function we obtain a tax system which is overall inequality reducing and reference independent if some restrictions hold on income domain, on the set of taxable income and on the tax function for the reference type: we think that these restrictions are not too limitative as it can be understood from the applicative part. The paper is organized as follows. In the first part, following Ebert-Lambert (2004), horizontal equity (HE) conditions are defined in both cases when equivalence scales are income dependent or income independent. Then, following Ebert-Moyes (2000), we summarize what has to be meant for an overall inequality reducing tax system (OIR), for a within type inequality reducing (WIR) tax system and for a reference independent tax system (RI). In the second part the paper we describe the particular affine income transformation function that we adopt and we investigate on the conditions allowing to this function to generate a tax system which is OIR and WIR. In the third part we simulate modifications to the present personal income tax in Poland, with the aim to design a more family oriented system. The paper is completed by an appendix which analyzes the relation among the most important instruments used in the real world to take into account horizontal equity. Quotient, exemption and tax credit are discussed under different hypotheses on tax function.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://wp.demm.unimi.it/tl_files/wp/2006/DEMM-2006_015wp.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano in its series Departmental Working Papers with number 2006-15.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 08 May 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2006-15

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Via Conservatorio 7, I-20122 Milan - Italy
Phone: +39 02 50321522
Fax: +39 02 50321505
Web page: http://www.demm.unimi.it
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Family Taxation; Horizontal Equity; Vertical Equity; Overall inequality reduction; Family quotient; Exemptions; Tax credit;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Udo Ebert, 2000. "Equivalizing Incomes: A Normative Approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer, vol. 7(6), pages 619-640, December.
  2. Kolm, Serge-Christophe, 1976. "Unequal inequalities. I," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 416-442, June.
  3. Dagum, Camilo, 1980. "Inequality Measures between Income Distributions with Applications," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(7), pages 1791-1803, November.
  4. Fei, John C H, 1981. "Equity Oriented Fiscal Programs," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 869-81, June.
  5. Bossert, Walter & Pfingsten, Andreas, 1990. "Intermediate inequality: concepts, indices, and welfare implications," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 117-134, April.
  6. Dagum, Camilo, 1997. "A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 515-31.
  7. Udo Ebert & Peter J Lambert, . "Horizontal Equity and Progession when Equivalence Scales are not Constant," Discussion Papers 02/02, Department of Economics, University of York.
  8. Dagum, Camilo, 1987. "Measuring the Economic Affluence between Populations of Income Receivers," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 5(1), pages 5-12, January.
  9. Fellman, J, 1976. "The Effect of Transformations on Lorenz Curves," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(4), pages 823-24, July.
  10. Chen, Chau-Nan & Tsaur, Tien-Wang & Rhai, Tong-Shieng, 1982. "The Gini Coefficient and Negative Income," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 473-78, November.
  11. Donaldson, D. & Pendakur, K., 1999. "Equivalent-Income Functions and Income-Dependent Equivalence Scales," Discussion Papers dp99-8, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
  12. Ebert, Udo & Moyes, Patrick, 2000. "Consistent Income Tax Structures When Households Are Heterogeneous," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 116-150, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2006-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask DEMM Working Papers to update the entry or send us the correct address.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.