Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Measures of Performance in Primary Care - a Review of Efficiency Studies

Contents:

Author Info

  • Roberta Longo

    ()
    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Claire Hulme

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Andrew Smith

    (Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    With the economic downturn inflicting austerity on the British National Health Service, the issue of efficiency is of paramount importance for health care policy makers who are called upon to identify where efficiency savings can be made without hindering the quality of care. Research exploring efficiency in health is still relatively new. The measurement of efficiency is made difficult by the multifaceted nature of the output of health care, particularly so in primary care. On the other hand simple measures of activity cannot be considered sufficient, particularly given the system of incentives introduced for primary care providers such as the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in UK. In this paper we review studies that have used stochastic frontier analysis to measure the efficiency of primary care providers and purchasers. We find that quality indicators are increasingly being used in explaining cost variation and relative efficiency differences. To our knowledge though, there are no UK based studies that have used data from the QOF. We argue that QOF is an invaluable source of information which should enable more accurate and insightful analysis of relative efficiency in primary care by incorporating appropriate measures of quality.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/download/251/auhe_wp12_03
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds in its series Working Papers with number 1203.

    as in new window
    Length: 10 pages
    Date of creation: 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1203

    Contact details of provider:
    Phone: Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, LEEDS LS9 2LJ
    Fax: +44 (0) 113 343 3470
    Email:
    Web page: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/auhe
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Efficiency; Primary Health Care; Stochastic Frontier Analysis; Quality and Outcome Framework;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Giuffrida, Antonio & Gravelle, Hugh & Sutton, Matthew, 2000. "Efficiency and administrative costs in primary care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 983-1006, November.
    2. Lisa C. DeFelice & W. David Bradford, 1997. "Relative inefficiencies in production between solo and group practice physicians," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(5), pages 455-465.
    3. Luis Murillo-Zamorano & Carmelo Petraglia, 2011. "Technical efficiency in primary health care: does quality matter?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 115-125, April.
    4. Antonio Giuffrida & Hugh Gravelle, 2001. "Measuring performance in primary care: econometric analysis and DEA," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 163-175.
    5. Gaynor, Martin & Pauly, Mark V, 1990. "Compensation and Productive Efficiency of Partnerships: Evidence from Medical Group Practice," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(3), pages 544-73, June.
    6. Bruce Hollingsworth, 2008. "The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(10), pages 1107-1128.
    7. Jaume Puig-Junoy & Vicente Ort´┐Żn, 2004. "Cost efficiency in primary care contracting: a stochastic frontier cost function approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(12), pages 1149-1165.
    8. Filipe Amado, Carla Alexandra & Dyson, Robert G., 2008. "On comparing the performance of primary care providers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 915-932, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Veale).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.