IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jic/wpaper/228.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perceived Home and Host Country Institutional Environment Pressures by Bilateral Development Cooperation Agency's Constituents

Author

Listed:
  • Katsutoshi Fushimi

Abstract

Neo-institutional theorists assert that institutional environments control organisational behaviour. They have extensively researched private multinational corporations (MNCs) but have scarcely touched public sector organisations. Prior studies have also tended to overlook the heterogeneity of constituents. The current study examines how four distinct groups of bilateral development cooperation agency (BDCA) staff (Headquarters [HQ] management, HQ non-management, overseas offices [OOs] management, and OOs non-management) perceive institutional environment pressures from home and host countries. For this, the author developed six hypotheses and then statistically tested them. Data were obtained through an online survey primarily using a five-point Likert scale (strongly disagree=1, disagree=2, neutral=3, agree=4, strongly agree=5). 131 valid responses were analysed by the Mann–Whitney U test. The results showed no statistically significant differences between the horizontally distant groups in perceived institutional environment pressures. Both the HQ and the OOs staff felt an identically powerful home country accountability pressure (Md=5 for both). Host country government and technical cooperation project counterpart expectation and demand pressures were modest for both the HQ (Md=3 and Md=3) and the OOs staff (Md=3.5 and Md=3). Meanwhile, significant differences were identified in perceived home country accountability pressure by the HQ management and the HQ non-management staff (p

Suggested Citation

  • Katsutoshi Fushimi, 2022. "Perceived Home and Host Country Institutional Environment Pressures by Bilateral Development Cooperation Agency's Constituents," Working Papers 228, JICA Research Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:jic:wpaper:228
    DOI: 10.18884/00001060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://doi.org/10.18884/00001060
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jicari.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=1083&file_id=22&file_no=1
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18884/00001060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kostova, Tatiana & Marano, Valentina & Tallman, Stephen, 2016. "Headquarters–subsidiary relationships in MNCs: Fifty years of evolving research," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 176-184.
    2. Alex Jacobs & Chris Barnett & Richard Ponsford, 2010. "Three Approaches to Monitoring: Feedback Systems, Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation and Logical Frameworks," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(6), pages 36-44, November.
    3. Jean-Claude Thoenig, 2011. "Institutional Theories and Public Institutions," Post-Print halshs-00638348, HAL.
    4. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2017. "Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198747482.
    5. Fligstein, Neil, 2001. "Social Skill and the Theory of Fields," Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Working Paper Series qt26m187b1, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics of theInstitute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
    6. Nizar M. Alsharari Author-Email: nalsharari@uaeu.ac.ae; nizaralsharari@gmail.com, 2017. "Institutional Logics and ERP Implementation in Public Sector Agency," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(2), pages 417-425, April-Jun.
    7. Lant Pritchett & Michael Woolcock & Matt Andrews, 2013. "Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Ryan J Orr & W Richard Scott, 2008. "Institutional exceptions on global projects: a process model," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(4), pages 562-588, June.
    9. Amy J Hillman & William P Wan, 2005. "The determinants of MNE subsidiaries' political strategies: evidence of institutional duality," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 36(3), pages 322-340, May.
    10. Dörrenbächer, Christoph & Geppert, Mike, 2009. "A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: Evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 100-112, April.
    11. Whittle, Andrea & Suhomlinova, Olga & Mueller, Frank, 2011. "Dialogue and distributed agency in institutional transmission," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 548-569, July.
    12. Valentina Marano & Tatiana Kostova, 2016. "Unpacking the Institutional Complexity in Adoption of CSR Practices in Multinational Enterprises," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 28-54, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalpana Tokas & Kartik Yadav, 2023. "Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1302-1325, December.
    2. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2013. "Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 234-244.
    3. Alexander Mohr & Christian Schumacher, 2019. "The Contingent Effect of Patriotic Rhetoric on Firm Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 94-110, June.
    4. Pei Sun & Jonathan P. Doh & Tazeeb Rajwani & Donald Siegel, 2021. "Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(9), pages 1818-1853, December.
    5. Vigneau, Laurence, 2020. "A micro-level perspective on the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices in multinational corporations," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).
    6. Barnard, Helena & Mamabolo, Anastacia, 2022. "On religion as an institution in international business: Executives’ lived experience in four African countries," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    7. Lawson, Andrew & Harris, Jamelia, 2023. "Is the problem driven iterative adaptation approach (PDIA) a panacea for public financial management reform? Evidence from six African countries," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    8. Matt Andrews & Tim McNaught & Salimah Samji, 2018. "Opening Adaptation Windows onto Public Financial Management Reform Gaps in Mozambique," CID Working Papers 341, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    9. David Carment & Yiagadeesen Samy, 2023. "Aid effectiveness in fragile and conflict-affected contexts: Lessons from more than two decades of research," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-8, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Curchod, Corentin & Patriotta, Gerardo & Wright, Mike, 2020. "Self-categorization as a nonmarket strategy for MNE subsidiaries: Tracking the international expansion of an online platform," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    11. Ziad F. Elsahn & Maureen Benson-Rea, 2018. "Political Schemas and Corporate Political Activities During Foreign Market Entry: A Micro-process Perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 771-811, October.
    12. Kum-Sik Oh & Yeon-Sik Ryu, 2019. "FDI, Institutional Quality, and Bribery: An Empirical Examination in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-11, July.
    13. Ajai S Gaur & Chinmay Pattnaik & Deeksha Singh & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2019. "Internalization advantage and subsidiary performance: The role of business group affiliation and host country characteristics," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1253-1282, October.
    14. Luis Alfonso Dau & Elizabeth M Moore & William Newburry, 2020. "The grass is always greener: The impact of home and host country CSR reputation signaling on cross-country investments," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(2), pages 154-182, June.
    15. Hartmann, Julia & Inkpen, Andrew & Ramaswamy, Kannan, 2022. "An FsQCA exploration of multiple paths to ecological innovation adoption in European transportation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    16. Qiaowen Zhang & Annalien de Vries, 2022. "Seeking Moral Legitimacy through Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Multinationals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Conroy, Kieran M. & Collings, David G., 2016. "The legitimacy of subsidiary issue selling: Balancing positive & negative attention from corporate headquarters," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 612-627.
    18. Yanguas, Pablo, 2021. "What have we learned about learning? Unpacking the relationship between knowledge and organisational change in development agencies," IDOS Discussion Papers 9/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    19. Buchanan, Sean & Marques, José Carlos, 2018. "How home country industry associations influence MNE international CSR practices: Evidence from the Canadian mining industry," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 63-74.
    20. Roger Schweizer & Katarina Lagerström & Johan Jakobsson, 2021. "Headquarters–subsidiary interaction during the introduction of a value product in India," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(5), pages 666-688, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jic:wpaper:228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Japan International Cooperation Agency Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/jicgvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.