Helmut Dietl () (Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich) Martin Grossmann () (Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich) Markus Lang () (Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich)
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
Considering their practical importance, cooperatives are among the least researched forms of organization found in the literature. In this paper, we develop a model to compare markets, cooperatives, and hierarchies in terms of organizational efficiency. We show that these three alternative forms of business organizations differ with respect to the acquisition of general versus idiosyncratic knowledge and with respect to their effectiveness in solving hold-up problems. Market forms of business organizations are a marvel with respect to the aggregation and use of idiosyncratic knowledge, but they cause hold-up problems in the case of specific investments. Cooperative and hierarchical forms of business organizations, on the other hand, solve hold-up problems and effectively enhance the acquisition and use of general knowledge. Moreover, we show that cooperative organizations dominate market organizations (hierarchical organizations) in terms of efficiency if the acquisition of general (idiosyncratic) knowledge is important for value creation in a specific industrial sector.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU) in its series Working Papers with number
0068.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: