IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipe/ipetds/1058.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ALCA: Uma Estimativa do Impacto no Comércio Bilateral Brasil-Estados Unidos

Author

Listed:
  • Honório Kume
  • Guida Piani

Abstract

Este trabalho procura quantificar o impacto da Área de Livre Comércio das Américas(Alca) no comércio bilateral Brasil-Estados Unidos com base em um modelo deequilíbrio parcial computável. O estudo efetua um levantamento detalhado dasrestrições não-tarifárias vigentes para cada produto e utiliza os respectivosequivalentes não-tarifários na estimação. Os resultados obtidos para o Brasil indicamuma variação de US$ 2,2 bilhões nas importações e de US$ 1,2 bilhão nasexportações. No aumento das vendas externas brasileiras, 43,3% são decorrentes daeliminação das barreiras não-tarifárias, instrumento protecionista de grande importânciana política comercial norte-americana. This paper aims to evaluate the impact on trade flows between Brazil and the UnitedStates after the accomplishment of the FTAA. The authors used a computable partialequilibrium model. A comprehensive investigation of the existing non-tariff barrierswas made and the tariff-equivalents were used in the estimations. The results forBrazil show an increase of US$ 2.2 billion in its imports from the United States andan increase of US$ 1.2 billion in its exports to that country. Almost half of the gainsfor Brazilian exports would be brought about by the elimination of the NorthAmerican non-tariff barriers, indicating their importance as a protectionist measureof trade policy in the USA.

Suggested Citation

  • Honório Kume & Guida Piani, 2004. "ALCA: Uma Estimativa do Impacto no Comércio Bilateral Brasil-Estados Unidos," Discussion Papers 1058, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_1058.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel, Vaillant & Alvaro, Ons, 2003. "Winners and Losers in a Free Trade Area between the United States and MERCOSUR," MPRA Paper 47315, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2003.
    2. Bernard Hoekman & Francis Ng & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2002. "Eliminating Excessive Tariffs on Exports of Least Developed Countries," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Honório Kume & Guida Piani & Pedro Miranda, 2005. "Índia-Mercosul: Perspectivas de um Acordo de Preferências Comerciais," Discussion Papers 1120, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    2. Almeida, Eduardo Simões de & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins, 2010. "Is the truth out there? Avaliando as opções de integração econômica para o Brasil [Is the truth out there? Evaluating the economic integration options for Brazil]," MPRA Paper 54443, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Curzel, Rosana & Silber, Simão Davi & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins, 2007. "Argentina, Brasil e Uruguai: um estudo dos impactos regionais da ALCA [Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: a study of the regional impacts of ALCA]," MPRA Paper 54502, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    2. Garth Frazer & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2010. "Trade Growth under the African Growth and Opportunity Act," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(1), pages 128-144, February.
    3. Mohamed Hedi Bchir & Lionel Fontagné & Sébastien Jean, 2005. "From Bound Duties to Actual Protection: Industrial Liberalisation in the Doha Round," Working Papers 2005-12, CEPII research center.
    4. Alexander Schejtman & Julio A. Berdegué, 2006. "El Impacto Social de la Integración Regional en América Latina Rural," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9125, Inter-American Development Bank.
    5. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Trade Liberalization, Agriculture, and Poverty in Low-income Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm & Priyadarshi, Shishir, 2016. "Has the multilateral Hong Kong Ministerial decision on duty free quota free market access provided a breakthrough in the Least developed countries' export performance?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2016-06, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    7. Aaditya Mattoo & Devesh Roy & Arvind Subramanian, 2003. "The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act and its Rules of Origin: Generosity Undermined?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 829-851, June.
    8. Lionel Fontagné & Thierry Mayer & Soledad Zignago, 2005. "Trade in the Triad: how easy is the access to large markets?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1401-1430, November.
    9. BOUËT Antoine & BUREAU Jean-Christophe & DECREUX Yvan & JEAN Sébastien, 2010. "Is Northern Agricultural Liberalization Beneficial to Developing Countries?," EcoMod2003 330700021, EcoMod.
    10. Achterbosch, Thom J. & Ben Hammouda, H. & Osakwe, Patrick N. & van Tongeren, Frank W., 2004. "Trade Liberalisation Under The Doha Development Agenda; Options And Consequences For Africa," Report Series 29104, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    11. Bouët Antoine & Laborde-Debucquet David & Dienesch Elisa & Elliott Kimberly, 2012. "The Costs and Benefits of Duty-Free, Quota-Free Market Access for Poor Countries: Who and What Matters," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Oskam, A.J. & Komen, M.H.C. & Wobst, P. & Yalew, A., 2004. "Trade policies and development of less-favoured areas: evidence from the literature," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 445-466, August.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/10189 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Jean, Sebastien & Matthews, Alan, 2005. "Concessions and Exemptions for Developing Countries in the Agricultural Negotiations: The Role of the Special and Differential Treatment," Working Papers 18858, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    15. Ms. Patrizia Tumbarello, 2005. "Regional Trade Integration and WTO Accession: Which Is the Right Sequencing? An Application to the CIS," IMF Working Papers 2005/094, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Joseph Francois, 2002. "Formulas for Success? Some Options for Market Access Negotiations," International Trade 0210001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Bown,Chad P. & Crowley,Meredith A & Bown,Chad P. & Crowley,Meredith A, 2016. "The empirical landscape of trade policy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7620, The World Bank.
    18. Patrick Messerlin, 2005. "Agricultural Liberalization in the Doha Round," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01020638, HAL.
    19. Justyna Wieloch, 2015. "Kraje rozwijające się w ugrupowaniach integracyjnych / Developing Countries in Economic Agreements," International Economics, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, issue 9, pages 40-49, March.
    20. Lawrence, Robert Z. & Rosito, Tatiana, 2006. "A New Compensation Mechanism for Preference Erosion in the Doha Round," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2408, Inter-American Development Bank.
    21. Mattoo, Aaditya & Subramanian, Arvind, 2004. "The WTO and the poorest countries: the stark reality," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 385-407, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Schiavinatto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipeaabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.