IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/17-psp-2018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strategic Planning in the Russian Federal Government: Implementation, Costs, and Conditions of Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Klimenko
  • Alexander Kalgin

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

A vital aspect of improving governance involves spearheading its strategic dimension and making current policy activities more closely aligned with the goals and objectives of sustainable growth. At the same time, implementation of strategic management is associated with considerable costs for the drafting, cross-cutting coordination and monitoring of strategic planning documents. These costs are often not taken into account. This article aims at showing that the costs of developing strategic plans can be significant. This is confirmed by survey data that allowed for estimating costs of drafting strategic planning documents in Russia

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Klimenko & Alexander Kalgin, 2018. "Strategic Planning in the Russian Federal Government: Implementation, Costs, and Conditions of Effectiveness," HSE Working papers WP BRP 17/PSP/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:17/psp/2018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2018/04/09/1164445113/17PSP2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pantazopoulos, K N & Houstis, E N & Kortesis, S, 1998. "Front-Tracking Finite Difference Methods for the Valuation of American Options," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 255-273, December.
    2. George Boyne & Julian Gould-Williams, 2003. "Planning and performance in public organizations An empirical analysis," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 115-132, March.
    3. Trevor Shaw, 2016. "Performance budgeting practices and procedures," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 15(3), pages 65-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatima, Samar & Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S., 2020. "National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 178-194.
    2. Richard Austin & Guy Garrod & Nicola Thompson, 2016. "Assessing the performance of the national park authorities: a case study of Northumberland National Park, England," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 325-332, July.
    3. Olga V. Bogacheva & Oleg V. Smorodinov, 2019. "Major Aspects of Organization of Public R&D Funding in OECD Countries," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 2, pages 37-50, April.
    4. Eyo Emmanuel Essien & Christian Amadi & Rajunor Bassey Anani, 2019. "Understanding the Influence of Time Pressure and Social Ties on Public Sector Supplier Selection Decisions: A Polychronic Context Explanation," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 79-93, March.
    5. Yongqiang Chu & Huan Zhang, 2022. "Do Age-Friendly Community Policy Efforts Matter in China? An Analysis Based on Five-Year Developmental Plan for Population Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Pessino, Carola & Izquierdo, Alejandro & Vuletin, Guillermo, 2018. "Better Spending for Better Lives: How Latin America and the Caribbean Can Do More with Less," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 9152.
    7. Ettelt, Stefanie & Fazekas, Mihaly & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2012. "Assessing health care planning – A framework-led comparison of Germany and New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 50-59.
    8. Olga V. Bogacheva & Oleg V. Smorodinov, 2019. "Creation of Enabling Environment for Spending Reviews in Russia," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 21-33, February.
    9. Luca Papi & Riccardo Ievoli & Giorgia Gobbo & Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Lamberto Manzoli, 2021. "Performance governance per la generazione di Valore Pubblico in sanit?. Evidenze empiriche dalle aziende sanitarie dell?Emilia-Romagna," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(117), pages 27-58.
    10. Usang Edet Usang, Obal & Salim, Basariah, 2018. "The Relationship Between Institutional Environment, Internal Audit And Performance Of Local Governments In Nigeria," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 7(2), pages 120-147, December.
    11. Koulisianis, M.D & Papatheodorou, T.S, 2000. "A ‘moving index’ method for the solution of the American options valuation problem," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 373-381.
    12. Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Michele Bigoni & Luca Papi & Giorgia Gobbo, 2019. "La programmazione dei Ministeri nella nuova stagione della performance. Dalla burocrazia della performance alla performance utile," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 169-189.
    13. Christine A. Kabui & Vincent N. Machuki & John K. Yabs & James M. Njihia, 2018. "Strategic Planning Process Intensity and Formality Impact on the Performance of Accredited Universities in Kenya," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 153-153, August.
    14. Staszewski, Bartosz, 2021. "Analiza oddziaływania instytucji zarządzania budżetowego na innowacyjność sektora publicznego," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Strategic planning; governance; institutional changes; administrative cost; accountability; incentives; stakeholder’s involvement.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:17/psp/2018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.