IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/aarbls/2004-003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The (r,q) policy for the lost-sales inventory system when more than one order may be outstanding

Author

Listed:
  • Johansen, Søren Glud

    (Department of Operations Research)

  • Thorstenson, Anders

    (Department of Business Studies)

Abstract

We study the continuous-review (r; q) system in which un_lled demands are treated as lost sales. The reorder point r is allowed to be equal to or larger than the order quantity q. Hence, we do not restrict our attention to the well-known case with at most one replenishment order outstanding, but our modeling streamlines exact analysis of that case. The cost structure is standard. We assume that demand is Poisson, that lead times are Erlangian and that orders do not cross in time (lead times are sequential). We determine the equilibrium distribution of the inventory on hand at the delivery instants from the solution (obtained by the Gauss-Seidel method) of the equilibrium equations of a Markov chain. To optimize r and q we develop an adapted version of the algorithm suggested by Federgruen and Zheng for the backorders model (BO). The results obtained in our numerical study show that the suggested procedure dominates standard textbook approximations. In particular, the reductions in the average cost of a simple Economic Order Quantity policy are in the range of 3-14%. Except when lead times are long and variable or when the unit cost of shortage is low, the optimal BO policy provides a fair approximation to the average cost of the best policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Johansen, Søren Glud & Thorstenson, Anders, 2004. "The (r,q) policy for the lost-sales inventory system when more than one order may be outstanding," CORAL Working Papers L-2004-03, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhb:aarbls:2004-003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hha.dk/afl/wp/log/L_2004_03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hill, Roger M., 1992. "Numerical analysis of a continuous-review lost-sales inventory model where two orders may be outstanding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 11-26, October.
    2. Awi Federgruen & Yu-Sheng Zheng, 1992. "An Efficient Algorithm for Computing an Optimal (r, Q) Policy in Continuous Review Stochastic Inventory Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 808-813, August.
    3. Johansen, Soren Glud & Thorstenson, Anders, 1993. "Optimal and approximate (Q, r) inventory policies with lost sales and gamma-distributed lead time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 179-194, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kjeldsen, Karina Hjortshøj, 2008. "Classification of routing and scheduling problems in liner shipping," CORAL Working Papers L-2008-06, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    2. Bijvank, Marco & Vis, Iris F.A., 2011. "Lost-sales inventory theory: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Acar, Müge & Kaya, Onur, 2023. "Dynamic inventory decisions for humanitarian aid materials considering budget limitations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johansen, Soren Glud & Thorstenson, Anders, 1996. "Optimal (r, Q) inventory policies with Poisson demands and lost sales: discounted and undiscounted cases," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 359-371, December.
    2. Bijvank, Marco & Vis, Iris F.A., 2011. "Lost-sales inventory theory: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Hill, Roger M. & Johansen, Soren Glud, 2006. "Optimal and near-optimal policies for lost sales inventory models with at most one replenishment order outstanding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 111-132, February.
    4. Minner, Stefan & Silver, Edward A., 2005. "Evaluation of two simple extreme transshipment strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Emre Berk & Ülkü Gürler & Saeed Poormoaied, 2020. "On the $$\varvec{(Q,r)}$$(Q,r) policy for perishables with positive lead times and multiple outstanding orders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 81-98, January.
    6. Tamjidzad, Shahrzad & Mirmohammadi, S. Hamid, 2015. "An optimal (r, Q) policy in a stochastic inventory system with all-units quantity discount and limited sharable resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 93-100.
    7. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    8. Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal & Heydari, Jafar, 2010. "Supply chain coordination for the joint determination of order quantity and reorder point using credit option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 86-95, July.
    9. Sana, Shib Sankar, 2013. "Optimal contract strategies for two stage supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 253-260.
    10. Johansen, Søren Glud & Thorstenson, Anders, 2014. "Emergency orders in the periodic-review inventory system with fixed ordering costs and compound Poisson demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 147-157.
    11. van Donselaar, Karel H. & Broekmeulen, Rob A.C.M., 2013. "Determination of safety stocks in a lost sales inventory system with periodic review, positive lead-time, lot-sizing and a target fill rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 440-448.
    12. Chen, Youhua Frank, 2005. "Fractional programming approach to two stochastic inventory problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 63-71, January.
    13. Marcus Ang & Karl Sigman & Jing-Sheng Song & Hanqin Zhang, 2017. "Closed-Form Approximations for Optimal ( r , q ) and ( S , T ) Policies in a Parallel Processing Environment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1414-1428, October.
    14. Paul Zipkin, 2008. "Old and New Methods for Lost-Sales Inventory Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1256-1263, October.
    15. Xiaobo Zhao & Fan Fan & Xiaoliang Liu & Jinxing Xie, 2007. "Storage-Space Capacitated Inventory System with ( r, Q ) Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 854-865, October.
    16. Ruud Heuts & Jan de Klein, 1995. "An (s, q) inventory model with stochastic and interrelated lead times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(5), pages 839-859, August.
    17. Johansen, Soren Glud & Thorstenson, Anders, 1998. "An inventory model with Poisson demands and emergency orders," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 275-289, September.
    18. Erica L. Plambeck & Amy R. Ward, 2007. "Note: A Separation Principle for a Class of Assemble-to-Order Systems with Expediting," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 603-609, June.
    19. Mor Armony & Erica Plambeck & Sridhar Seshadri, 2009. "Sensitivity of Optimal Capacity to Customer Impatience in an Unobservable M/M/S Queue (Why You Shouldn't Shout at the DMV)," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 19-32, June.
    20. Tang, Shaolong & Wang, Wenjie & Cho, Stella & Yan, Hong, 2018. "Reducing emissions in transportation and inventory management: (R, Q) Policy with considerations of carbon reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 327-340.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:aarbls:2004-003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helle Vinbaek Stenholt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifhhadk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.