IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/aarbin/2008-001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Managing Cultural Variation in Software Process Improvement: A Comparison of Methods for Subculture Assessment

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The scale and complexity of change in software process improvement (SPI) are considerable and managerial attention to organizational culture during SPI can therefore potentially contribute to successful outcomes. However, we know little about the impact of variations in organizational subculture on SPI initiatives. On this backdrop, we report from a large scale SPI project in a Danish high-tech company, Terma. Two of its business units – Integrated Systems (ISY) and Airborne Systems (ASY) – followed similar approaches over a two year period, but with quite different outcomes. While ISY reached CMMI level 2 as planned, ASY struggled to implement even modest improvements. To explain these differences, we analyzed the underlying organizational culture within ISY and ASY using two different methods for subculture assessment. The study demonstrates how variations in culture across software organizations can have important implications for SPI outcomes. Furthermore, it provides insights into how software managers can practically assess subcultures to inform decisions about and help prepare plans for SPI initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Müller, Sune Dueholm & Kræmmergaard, Pernille & Mathiassen, Lars, 2008. "Managing Cultural Variation in Software Process Improvement: A Comparison of Methods for Subculture Assessment," Informatics Research Group Working Papers I-2008-01, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhb:aarbin:2008-001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hha.dk/bs/wp/inf/I_2008_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina), 1993. "CASE tools as organizational change : investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development," Working papers WP 3579-93., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. John M. Jermier & John W. Slocum & Louis W. Fry & Jeannie Gaines, 1991. "Organizational Subcultures in a Soft Bureaucracy: Resistance Behind the Myth and Facade of an Official Culture," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 170-194, May.
    3. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Dierkes, Meinolf & Hähner, Katrin, 1997. "Business perception of contextual changes: sources and impediments to organizational learning," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 97-110, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lehmann, Hans & Gallupe, Brent, 2005. "Information systems for multinational enterprises--some factors at work in their design and implementation," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 163-186, June.
    2. Vincent Mangematin, 2011. "How do Academics adopt new practices during a reform ? The Evolution of doctoral education in France 1992-2009," Working Papers hal-00658038, HAL.
    3. Denis Dennehy & Kieran Conboy & Jaganath Babu, 2023. "Adopting Learning Analytics to Inform Postgraduate Curriculum Design: Recommendations and Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1315-1331, August.
    4. Balasubramaniam Ramesh & Kannan Mohan & Lan Cao, 2012. "Ambidexterity in Agile Distributed Development: An Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 323-339, June.
    5. Sunday C. Eze & Vera C. A. Chinedu-Eze & Hart O. Awa, 2021. "Key Success Factors (KSFs) Underlying the Adoption of Social Media Marketing Technology," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    6. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    7. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    8. Sven Heidenreich & Katrin Talke, 2020. "Consequences of mandated usage of innovations in organizations: developing an innovation decision model of symbolic and forced adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 279-298, December.
    9. Joseph Feller & Patrick Finnegan & Brian Fitzgerald & Jeremy Hayes, 2008. "From Peer Production to Productization: A Study of Socially Enabled Business Exchanges in Open Source Service Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 475-493, December.
    10. Irsa, Wolfram, 2019. "The Silent Diffusion of Sticky Costs in the HoReCa Industry," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 130-136, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    11. Havelka, Douglas & Merhout, Jeffrey W., 2013. "Internal information technology audit process quality: Theory development using structured group processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 165-192.
    12. Maria Chiara Di Guardo & Francesca Cabiddu, 2015. "E-service innovation: combining directed and practice-based approaches," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1-2), pages 81-95, January.
    13. Ahrens, Thomas & Mollona, Massimiliano, 2007. "Organisational control as cultural practice--A shop floor ethnography of a Sheffield steel mill," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 305-331.
    14. Asif, Farah, 2011. "Estimating the impact of Denison's (1996), "What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars"," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 454-459, May.
    15. Hunter, Starling David, 2003. "Same Technology, Different Outcome? Lessons on Dummy Variables & Dependent Variable Transformations," Working papers 4308-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    16. Yilmaz, Cengiz & Ergun, Ercan, 2008. "Organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An examination of relative effects of culture traits and the balanced culture hypothesis in an emerging economy," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 290-306, July.
    17. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b26 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. TINA M. Sriraman Ramachandran & V. Srinivasan (Chino) Rao & Timothy Goles & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2012. "Variations in Information Security Cultures across Professions: A Qualitative Study," Working Papers 0021, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    19. Karin Olesen, 2014. "Technological Frames," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, March.
    20. Shu-Kung Hu & James J. H. Liou & Ming-Tsang Lu & Yen-Ching Chuang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2018. "Improving NFC Technology Promotion for Creating the Sustainable Education Environment by Using a Hybrid Modified MADM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, April.
    21. Lakshmi Balachandran Nair, 2021. "From ‘Whodunit’ to ‘How’: Detective Stories and Auditability in Qualitative Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 195-209, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:aarbin:2008-001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helle Vinbaek Stenholt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifhhadk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.