IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01449361.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La carte cognitive négociée : un outil susceptible de rétablir la confiance dans les collectivités territoriales ?

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Guirou

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'utilisation des cartes cognitives comme outil d'aide à la décision est à présent reconnue Cossette 2004). La carte cognitive négociée, en particulier, qui consiste à construire un consensus à travers le débat, pourrait se montrer utile pour favoriser la confiance entre les acteurs et accompagner els décisions collectives. Cependant, les structures des organisations peuvent avoir un impact sur les processus organisationnels (Simoni 2008). Les collectivités locales, qui ont à la fois certaines caractéristiques de la bureaucratie (Weber), disposent également d'espaces où s'installe l'anarchie organisée (Cohen, March, and Olsen 1972; Chevallier 1997; Huault 2009). Suite à une étude empirique dans trois communes, nous avons pu constater que ce cadre institutionnel, qui détermine les processus de décision, a un impact sur l'implémentation d'un outil cognitiviste. En effet, là où les procédures sont rigides, les cartes cognitives rencontrent des résistances fortes, tandis que là où l'organisation a des formes plus souples, plus informelles, des « slacks », ou « jeux dans les rouages » se forment, et la carte cognitive négociée devient bien plus efficace. Mots-clés : management public, cartes cognitives, décision, stratégie, structure organisationnelle

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Guirou, 2016. "La carte cognitive négociée : un outil susceptible de rétablir la confiance dans les collectivités territoriales ?," Post-Print halshs-01449361, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01449361
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01449361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01449361/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yves-André Perez, 2008. "La pratique de la recherche-intervention dans les organisations : retour sur les modes de production des connaissances gestionnaires à partir du terrain," Post-Print halshs-00952760, HAL.
    2. Christophe Gence-Creux, 2001. "Élections et favoritisme dans l'attribution des marchés de services publics locaux," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 52(3), pages 753-763.
    3. Florence Allard-Poesi, 1996. "Cartes Cognitives: Pour Ne Pas Jeter Le Bebe Avec L'Eau Du Bain," Post-Print hal-01490742, HAL.
    4. Isabelle Huault, 2009. "James March. Ambiguïté et déraison dans les organisations," Post-Print halshs-00671796, HAL.
    5. Mohammed, Susan & Ringseis, Erika, 2001. "Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 310-335, July.
    6. Simon, Herbert A, 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 493-513, September.
    7. Charles R. Schwenk, 1984. "Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 111-128, April.
    8. Gilles Jeannot & Luc Rouban, 2009. "Changer la fonction publique," Post-Print hal-00582836, HAL.
    9. Anne Rozan & Anne Stenger, 2000. "Intérêts et limites de la méthode du transfert de bénéfices," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 336(1), pages 69-78.
    10. repec:hal:journl:dumas-00875698 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Christophe Gence-Creux, 2001. "Elections et favoritisme dans l'attribution des marchés de services publics locaux," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 52(3), pages 753-763.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camille Guirou, 2016. "La carte cognitive négociée : un outil efficace d'aide à la décision publique locale ?," Post-Print halshs-01405236, HAL.
    2. Muchow, Kai-Christian & Müller-Stewens, Günter, 2015. "Professional service firms and their strategic renewal: Evidence from Germany’s legal advisory industry," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(3), pages 279-301.
    3. Hu, Maggie Rong & Li, Xiaoyang & Shi, Yang, 2019. "Adverse Selection and Credit Certificates: Evidence from a P2P Platform," ADBI Working Papers 942, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    4. Desrieux, Claudine & Chong, Eshien & Saussier, Stéphane, 2013. "Putting all one's eggs in one basket: Relational contracts and the management of local public services," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 167-186.
    5. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2017. "The effect of cognitive diversity on the illusion of control bias in strategic decisions: An experimental investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 430-439.
    6. Maggie Rong Hu & Xiaoyang Li & Yang Shi, 2019. "Adverse Selection and Credit Certificates: Evidence from a P2P Platform," Working Papers id:13038, eSocialSciences.
    7. Francisco B. Galarza & Gabriella Wong, 2017. "The Impact of Price Information on Consumer Behavior: An Experiment," Working Papers 106, Peruvian Economic Association.
    8. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:1:y:2006:i::p:162-173 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Janvry, Alain & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David D., 1980. "Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt74v9m7dh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    11. Olson, Bradley J. & Bao, Yongjian & Parayitam, Satyanarayana, 2007. "Strategic decision making within Chinese firms: The effects of cognitive diversity and trust on decision outcomes," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 35-46, March.
    12. DeCanio, Stephen J. & Watkins, William E., 1998. "Information processing and organizational structure," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 275-294, August.
    13. Das, Willy & Das, Satyasiba, 2018. "Role of Heuristic Principles On Crowd-Funder's Investment Decision Making," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 443-452, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    14. Ichiishi, Tatsuro, 1985. "Management versus ownership, II," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, March.
    15. Hugo Benítez-Silva & Debra Dwyer & Wayne-Roy Gayle & Thomas Muench, 2008. "Expectations in micro data: rationality revisited," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 381-416, March.
    16. Jérémy Vignal, 2012. "Destinataires et agents du changement : quels comportements adoptent les managers de proximité en contexte de changement ?," Post-Print halshs-01108454, HAL.
    17. Siegfried Berninghaus & Werner Güth & M. Vittoria Levati & Jianying Qiu, 2006. "Satisficing in sales competition: experimental evidence," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-32, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    18. Ole Røgeberg & Morten Nordberg, 2005. "A defence of absurd theories in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 543-562.
    19. Cucchiarini, Veronica & Scicchitano, Sergio & Viale, Riccardo, 2024. "The Entrepreneur's Cognitive and Behavioral Journey: Understanding Heuristics and Bias under Risk and Uncertainty," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1390, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. Schilirò, Daniele & Graziano, Mario, 2011. "Scelte e razionalità nei modelli economici: un'analisi multidisciplinare [Choices and rationality in economic models: a multidisciplinary analysis]," MPRA Paper 31910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Mostafa Rezaei & Ivor Cribben & Michele Samorani, 2021. "A clustering-based feature selection method for automatically generated relational attributes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 233-263, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01449361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.