IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03085419.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le choix du collège : vers un empowerment de la famille ?

Author

Listed:
  • Angélique Rodhain

    (UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier, Labex Entreprendre - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Anaëlle Fargier

Abstract

Le collège public est censé constituer un non choix pour la famille, l'enfant étant affecté au collège du secteur associé à son adresse. L'assouplissement de la carte scolaire, outre la possibilité de scolariser son enfant dans le secteur privé, offre pourtant une plus grande possibilité de choix aux parents. A partir d'une étude de cas reposant sur l'observation d'un collège et d'entretiens semi-directifs avec 12 parents d'enfants en classe de CM2, cette recherche pose la question de l'empowerment perçu par les parents dans ce contexte. Les résultats font apparaitre une perception contrastée, entre des parents ne percevant pas d'empowerment car ne faisant pas de véritable choix, d'autres revendiquant un empowerment individuel, commun à un choix de consommation classique, d'autres encore un empowerment sociétal exprimant une vision de la société qu'ils désirent inclusive à travers leur choix. Mots clés empowerment ; collège ; enfant ; critères de choix ; inégalité Nous tenons à remercier les relecteurs qui, par leurs remarques constructives, ont largement participé à l'amélioration de cet article.

Suggested Citation

  • Angélique Rodhain & Anaëlle Fargier, 2020. "Le choix du collège : vers un empowerment de la famille ?," Post-Print hal-03085419, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03085419
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03085419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03085419/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire Dambrin & Caroline Lambert, 2008. "Les salariés sont de plus en plus autonomes dans les entreprises, c'est l'empowerment," Post-Print hal-00688493, HAL.
    2. Rehnuma Ali-Choudhury & Roger Bennett & Sharmila Savani, 2009. "University marketing directors’ views on the components of a university brand," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 6(1), pages 11-33, June.
    3. Angélique Rodhain & Aurélie Dehling & Virginie Silhouette-Dercourt, 2016. "La réflexivité du chercheur en comportement du consommateur: une attitude responsable," Post-Print hal-02082786, HAL.
    4. Bernard Pras, 1999. "Faire de la recherche en marketing ?," Post-Print halshs-00150654, HAL.
    5. Markus Giesler & Ela Veresiu, 2014. "Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 840-857.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwangho Jung & Seung-Hee Lee & Jane Workman, 2018. "Purchasing Counterfeits and Citizenship: Public Service Motivation Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Victoria Pagan & Kathryn Haynes & Stefanie Reissner, 2023. "Accountable Selves and Responsibility Within a Global Forum," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 255-270, October.
    3. Andrew Crane & Sarah Glozer, 2016. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1223-1252, November.
    4. Hong, Soonkwan & Vicdan, Handan, 2016. "Re-imagining the utopian: Transformation of a sustainable lifestyle in ecovillages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 120-136.
    5. Noha El-Bassiouny, 2016. "The Trojan Horse of Affluence and Halal in the Arabian Gulf," Working Papers 39, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    6. Gheorghe Epura & Bianca Tesca?iu & Raluca Dania Todor & Karin-Andreea Sasu, 2017. "Responsible Consumption – Source of Competitive Advantages and Solution for Tourist Protection," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 447-447, May.
    7. Yuan, Ruizhi & Liu, Martin J. & Luo, Jun & Yen, Dorothy A., 2016. "Reciprocal transfer of brand identity and image associations arising from higher education brand extensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3069-3076.
    8. Martin Hájek & Kristián Šrám & Maksym Kolomoiets & Ivan Cuker, 2020. "Uneasy Neoliberal Governance in a Low-Trust Society: Barriers to Responsibilisation in the Czech Republic," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(2), pages 201-218, June.
    9. Casey Carder Rockwell & David Crockett & Lenita Davis, 2020. "Mass incarceration and consumer financial harm: Critique of rent‐seeking by the carceral state," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 1062-1081, September.
    10. repec:abd:kauiea:v:31:y:2018:i:1:p:151-166 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    12. Ulysse Soulat & Jeanne Lallement, 2023. "Can quantified-self change urban mobility behaviour? The importance of information presentation [Le quantified-self peut-il changer les comportements de mobilité urbaine ? De l'importance de la pré," Post-Print hal-04367651, HAL.
    13. Robert Caruana & Sarah Glozer & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2020. "‘Alternative Hedonism’: Exploring the Role of Pleasure in Moral Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 143-158, September.
    14. Biraghi, Silvia & Gambetti, Rossella & Pace, Stefano, 2018. "Between tribes and markets: The emergence of a liquid consumer-entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 392-402.
    15. Bajde, Domen & Chelekis, Jessica & van Dalen, Arjen, 2022. "The megamarketing of microfinance: Developing and maintaining an industry aura of virtue," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 134-155.
    16. Roberta Pinna & Gianfranco Cicotto & Hosein Jafarkarimi, 2023. "Student’s Co-Creation Behavior in a Business and Economic Bachelor’s Degree in Italy: Influence of Perceived Service Quality, Institutional Image, and Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Rana, Jyoti & Paul, Justin, 2017. "Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 157-165.
    18. Laily Dwi Arsyianti & Salina Kassim, 2018. "Financial Prudence through Financial Education: A Conceptual Framework for Financial Inclusion الاحتراز المالي من خلال التعليم المالي: إطار مفاهيمي للإدماج المالي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 31(1), pages 151-166, January.
    19. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2017. "Liquid Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 582-597.
    20. Mohammad G. Nejad & Genevieve O’Connor, 2016. "An intersectional approach to evaluating consumer financial literacy," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 308-324, December.
    21. Helkkula, Anu & Arnould, Eric J., 2022. "Using neo-animism to revisit actors for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in S-D logic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 860-868.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    empowerment; collège; enfant; critères de choix; inégalité;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03085419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.