IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02872799.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Objet, raison d’être et praxis : les coopératives et le commun au secours de l’entreprise ?

Author

Listed:
  • Kévin Pastier

    (DICEN-IDF - Dispositifs d'Information et de Communication à l'Ère du Numérique - Paris Île-de-France - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • François Silva

    (Kedge BS - Kedge Business School, DICEN-IDF - Dispositifs d'Information et de Communication à l'Ère du Numérique - Paris Île-de-France - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - Université Gustave Eiffel)

Abstract

The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the stakeholders'approaches prevent to create a new conception of the firm theory. They are still based on an individualist and contractual paradigm where the shareholders'value remains central. Besides, the society is not yet included in the firm theory. However, we demonstrate that the current workers co-operatives manage to propose a different conception of the relation corporation/firm/society. We suggest to use the theory of commons as the theorical basis for a collective and democratic conception of the firm which disrupts the purpose and practices of the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Kévin Pastier & François Silva, 2020. "Objet, raison d’être et praxis : les coopératives et le commun au secours de l’entreprise ?," Post-Print hal-02872799, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02872799
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02872799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02872799/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodpaster, Kenneth E., 1991. "Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 53-73, January.
    2. Armand Hatchuel & Blanche Segrestin, 2016. "Trois propositions pour fonder une entreprise convivialiste," Post-Print hal-01394899, HAL.
    3. Edward Freeman, R. & Evan, William M., 1990. "Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation," Journal of Behavioral Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 337-359.
    4. Chassagnon, Virgile & Hollandts, Xavier, 2014. "Who are the owners of the firm: shareholders, employees or no one?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 47-69, March.
    5. Samuel Mercier & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2005. "La théorie des parties prenantes," Working Papers CREGO 1050502, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    6. Cazal, Didier, 2011. "RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 9.
    7. Samuel Mercier, 2010. "Une analyse historique du concept de parties prenantes : Quelles leçons pour l'avenir ?," Post-Print halshs-00521201, HAL.
    8. Edella Schlager & Elinor Ostrom, 1992. "Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(3), pages 249-262.
    9. D. Cazal, 2011. "RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat," Post-Print hal-00803206, HAL.
    10. D. Cazal, 2008. "Parties prenantes et RSE : des enjeux sociopolitiques au-delà des contrats," Post-Print hal-00323835, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Baret & Vincent Helfrich, 2019. "The “trilemma” of non-financial reporting and its pitfalls," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 485-511, June.
    2. Adel Aloui & Khaled Saadaoui & Manal Wehbi Sleiman, 2015. "Le concept de parties prenantes : proposition d'une modélisation systémique par le modèle SAGACE," Post-Print hal-01870859, HAL.
    3. Adel Aloui & Khaled Saadaoui & Manal Wehbi Sleiman, 2015. "Le concept de parties prenantes : proposition d'une modélisation systémique par le modèle SAGACE," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01870859, HAL.
    4. Mollie Painter & Mar Pérezts & Ghislain Deslandes, 2021. "Understanding the human in stakeholder theory : a phenomenological approach to affect-based learning," Post-Print hal-03188192, HAL.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1059 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hervé Charmettant & Yvan Renou, 2021. "Cooperative conversion and communalization: Closely observed interactions between the material and the mental," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 55-77, March.
    7. Bazlur RAHMAN, & Idris ALI, & Alexandru Mircea NEDELEA, 2017. "Greenwashing In Canadian Firms: An Assessment Of Environmental Claimsgreenwashing In Canadian Firms: An Assessment Of Environmental Claims," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(2), pages 1-8, july.
    8. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    9. Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas & Paranque, Bernard, 2018. "Finance and sustainability: From ideology to utopia," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 80-92.
    10. David Carassus & Khaled Albouaini & Marie Caussimont, 2013. "Une analyse de l'Audit Expectation Gap dans le contexte français," Post-Print hal-02432110, HAL.
    11. Fanny Romestant, 2017. "L’écoute des parties prenantes dans une optique de développement durable : continuité ou alternative pour le marketing de projets industriels ?," Post-Print hal-01867786, HAL.
    12. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.
    13. Sherline Dumano & Rémy Louis Budoc & Claude Fiore, 2018. "La mise en place du Transport Maritime à Courte Distance du Plateau des Guyanes à la Mer des Caraïbes : la perception des parties prenantes," Post-Print hal-02493411, HAL.
    14. Samuel Mansell, 2013. "Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 583-599, October.
    15. Joseph Heath, 2011. "Business Ethics and the ‘End of History’ in Corporate Law," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 5-20, March.
    16. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    17. Yves Fassin, 2012. "Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 83-96, August.
    18. Y. Fassin, 2008. "The Stakeholder Model Refined," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/529, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    19. Cazal, Didier, 2011. "RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 9.
    20. Eric Berthelot & Steven Coissard & Kachour Maher, 2012. "Les parties prenantes au cœur du business model," Working Papers hal-00967045, HAL.
    21. Silke Machold & Pervaiz Ahmed & Stuart Farquhar, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Ethics: A Feminist Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 665-678, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02872799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.