IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01744631.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated?

Author

Listed:
  • Kristiaan Kerstens

    (Department of Economics - IESEG School of Managementg, LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Zhiyang Shen
  • Ignace van de Woestyne

    (Department of Economics - Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel)

Abstract

We empirically compare both the popular Luenberger indicator with the less popular Luenberger-Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indicator on an agricultural panel data set of Chinese provinces over the years 1997–2014. In particular, we test for the differences in distribution when comparing these indicators. These tests are crucial to answer the question to which extent the Luenberger indicator can approximate the Luenberger-Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indicator that has a Total Factor Productivity (TFP) interpretation.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Kristiaan Kerstens & Zhiyang Shen & Ignace van de Woestyne, 2018. "Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated?," Post-Print hal-01744631, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01744631
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueli Chen & Vivian Valdmanis & Tuotuo Yu, 2020. "Productivity Growth in Chinese Medical Institutions during 2009–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Jin, Qianying & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2020. "Metafrontier productivity indices: Questioning the common convexification strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 737-747.
    3. Ang, Frederic & Kerstens, Pieter Jan, 2020. "A superlative indicator for the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator: Theory and application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1161-1173.
    4. Briec, Walter & Dumas, Audrey & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Stenger, Agathe, 2022. "Generalised commensurability properties of efficiency measures: Implications for productivity indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1481-1492.
    5. Zhiyang Shen & Vivian Valdmanis, 2022. "Assessing total factor productivity across Africa: an empirical investigation," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 239-253, December.
    6. Shen, Zhiyang & Wu, Haitao & Bai, Kaixuan & Hao, Yu, 2022. "Integrating economic, environmental and societal performance within the productivity measurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Jens J. Krüger, 2020. "Long‐run productivity trends: A global update with a global index," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 1393-1412, November.
    8. Deng, Haiyan & Zheng, Wangyi & Shen, Zhiyang & Štreimikienė, Dalia, 2023. "Does fiscal expenditure promote green agricultural productivity gains: An investigation on corn production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    9. Shen, Zhiyang & Baležentis, Tomas & Chen, Xueli & Valdmanis, Vivian, 2018. "Green growth and structural change in Chinese agricultural sector during 1997–2014," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-96.
    10. Kristiaan Kerstens & Jafar Sadeghi & Ignace Van de Woestyne & Linjia Zhang, 2022. "Malmquist productivity indices and plant capacity utilisation: new proposals and empirical application," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 221-250, August.
    11. Li, Yanxi & Yu, Conghui & Shi, Jinyan & Liu, Yuanyuan, 2023. "How does green bond issuance affect total factor productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    12. Helu Xiao & Na Wang & Shanping Wang, 2023. "Dynamic sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation in China: evidence from both novel non-convex global two-stage DEA and Malmquist productivity index," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1-40, June.
    13. Mocholi-Arce, Manuel & Sala-Garrido, Ramon & Molinos-Senante, Maria & Maziotis, Alexandros, 2021. "Water company productivity change: A disaggregated approach accounting for changes in inputs and outputs," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Frederic Ang & Kristiaan Kerstens & Jafar Sadeghi, 2023. "Energy productivity and greenhouse gas emission intensity in Dutch dairy farms: A Hicks–Moorsteen by‐production approach under non‐convexity and convexity with equivalence results," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 492-509, June.
    15. Tomas Balezentis & Kristiaan Kerstens & Zhiyang Shen, 2022. "Economic and Environmental Decomposition of Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen Total Factor Productivity Indicator: Empirical Analysis of Chinese Textile Firms With a Focus on Reporting Infeasibilities and Qu," Post-Print hal-03833245, HAL.
    16. Tang, Liwei & He, Gang, 2021. "How to improve total factor energy efficiency? An empirical analysis of the Yangtze River economic belt of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    17. Zhensheng Chen & Xueli Chen & Tomas Baležentis & Xiaoqing Gan & Vivian Valdmanis, 2020. "Productivity change and its driving forces in Chinese healthcare sector," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Zhiyang Shen & Vivian Valdmanis, 2020. "Identifying the contribution to hospital performance among Chinese regions by an aggregate directional distance function," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 142-152, March.
    19. Haiyan Deng & Ge Bai & Kristiaan Kerstens & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Comparing green productivity under convex and nonconvex technologies: Which is a robust approach consistent with energy structure?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4377-4394, December.
    20. Guerrini, Andrea & Molinos-Senante, María & Romano, Giulia, 2018. "Italian regulatory reform and water utility performance: An impact analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 95-102.
    21. Mocholi-Arce, Manuel & Sala-Garrido, Ramon & Molinos-Senante, Maria & Maziotis, Alexandros, 2023. "Profit productivity change in the English and Welsh water sector: Impact of the price reviews," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    22. Miao, Zhuang & Baležentis, Tomas & Shao, Shuai & Chang, Dongfeng, 2019. "Energy use, industrial soot and vehicle exhaust pollution—China's regional air pollution recognition, performance decomposition and governance," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 501-514.
    23. Justas Streimikis & Zhuang Miao & Tomas Balezentis, 2021. "Creation of climate‐smart and energy‐efficient agriculture in the European Union: Pathways based on the frontier analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 576-589, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01744631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.