IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01377087.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compliance with basic rules: the challenge of dialogical, enabling and disciplinary management
[Le respect des règles élémentaires : enjeu d'un management dialogique, habilitant et disciplinant]

Author

Listed:
  • Gérard Koenig

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

  • Isabelle Vandangeon-Derumez

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

  • Marie-Claire Marty

    (Service de Santé des Armées)

  • Yves Auroy

    (Service de Santé des Armées)

  • Jean-Paul Dumond

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

Abstract

Lying between two traditions of thought, one of which states that rules must always be respected (Weber, 1921), and the other that they can never be respected, this research suggests a third possibility, a contingent approach that distinguishes two types of rules: complex ones that cannot be scrupulously respected, and basic ones that are supposed to be strictly observed. Since the first type has been extensively studied, most of this article is devoted to basic rules and how they can be managed. In connection with collaborative management research carried out in a hospital in Île-de-France, we studied three activities: monitoring of peripheral venous catheters, sorting of healthcare waste and costing of hospital stays. After analysing breaches of basic rules for these activities, we propose corrective action of various kinds according to function, level of innovation and level of application. Regarding the latter, we have applied the recommendation of Reason (1997) which involves dealing with the problem of non-compliance with rules at three different levels: the organisational, engineering and individual levels. Whereas interventions carried out at the individual level have been widely discredited by studies of complex technological systems, our research shows their value when the relative simplicity of the situation makes it possible to formulate basic rules. Based on the observations made before and after implementing our proposed actions, we suggest adopting an approach to managing breaches of basic rules that we describe as dialogical, involving two complementary and antagonistic aspects: an enabling aspect and a disciplinary aspect.

Suggested Citation

  • Gérard Koenig & Isabelle Vandangeon-Derumez & Marie-Claire Marty & Yves Auroy & Jean-Paul Dumond, 2016. "Compliance with basic rules: the challenge of dialogical, enabling and disciplinary management [Le respect des règles élémentaires : enjeu d'un management dialogique, habilitant et disciplinant]," Post-Print hal-01377087, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01377087
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01377087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01377087/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Monin & Niels Noorderhaven & Eero Vaara & David Kroon, 2013. "Giving Sense to and Making Sense of Justice in Postmerger Integration," Post-Print hal-02276708, HAL.
    2. Anseel, Frederik & Lievens, Filip & Schollaert, Eveline, 2009. "Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 23-35, September.
    3. Olivier Babeau & Jean-François Chanlat, 2008. "La transgression, une dimension oubliée de l'organisation," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 201-219.
    4. Philippe Monin & Niels Noorderhaven & Eero Vaara & David Kroon, 2013. "Giving Sense to and Making Sense of Justice in Postmerger Integration," Post-Print hal-02312831, HAL.
    5. Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 941-957, December.
    6. Julia Balogun & Anne Sigismund Huff & Phyl Johnson, 2003. "Three Responses to the Methodological Challenges of Studying Strategizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 197-224, January.
    7. Olivier Babeau & Jean-François Chanlat, 2008. "La transgression, une dimension oubliée de l'organisation," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 201-219.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7495 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benoît Grasser & Florent Noël, 2023. "L'autonomie ne se décrète pas, elle s'apprend ! Une approche des processus d'autonomisation des salariés à l'aune du concept de capabilité," Post-Print hal-04179507, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danping Shao & Erhua Zhou & Peiran Gao, 2019. "Influence of Perceived Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Task Performance and Social Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Prior, Daniel D. & Keränen, Joona & Koskela, Sami, 2018. "Sensemaking, sensegiving and absorptive capacity in complex procurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 79-90.
    3. Mary Ann Glynn & Lee Watkiss, 2020. "Of Organizing and Sensemaking: From Action to Meaning and Back Again in a Half‐Century of Weick’s Theorizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1331-1354, November.
    4. Norbert Steigenberger & Hendrik Wilhelm, 2018. "Extending Signaling Theory to Rhetorical Signals: Evidence from Crowdfunding," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 529-546, June.
    5. Eero Vaara & Andrea Whittle, 2022. "Common Sense, New Sense or Non‐Sense? A Critical Discursive Perspective on Power in Collective Sensemaking," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 755-781, May.
    6. Ann‐Kristin Weiser, 2021. "The Role of Substantive Actions in Sensemaking During Strategic Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 815-848, May.
    7. Julia Balogun & Kathryn Fahy & Eero Vaara, 2019. "The interplay between HQ legitimation and subsidiary legitimacy judgments in HQ relocation: A social psychological approach," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(2), pages 223-249, March.
    8. Clara Martos-Martínez & Marta Muñoz-Guarasa, 2021. "The Importance of Endogenous Resources for Internationalization: Competitive Advantages in the Olive Groves of Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.
    9. Karin Andrea Wigger & Dean A. Shepherd, 2020. "We’re All in the Same Boat: A Collective Model of Preserving and Accessing Nature-Based Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(3), pages 587-617, May.
    10. Yu Tong & Sharon Swee-Lin Tan & Hock-Hai Teo, 2015. "The Road to Early Success: Impact of System Use in the Swift Response Phase," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 418-436, June.
    11. Sacha Lussier & Jean-François Chanlat, 2015. "L’évaluation des établissements d’enseignement et le rôle des enseignants-chercheurs en gestion : l’intériorisation institutionnelle de l’internationalisation," Post-Print hal-01655876, HAL.
    12. Xiao, Jing, 2018. "Post-acquisition dynamics of technology start-ups: drawing the temporal boundaries of post-acquisition restructuring process," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    13. Robert, Kihlberg & Ola, Lindberg, 2021. "Reflexive sensegiving: An open-ended process of influencing the sensemaking of others during organizational change," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 476-486.
    14. Mathieu Detchessahar & Benoît Journé, 2018. "Managing Strategic Discussions in Organizations: A Habermasian Perspective," Post-Print hal-02070709, HAL.
    15. Diana W.P. Kwok, 2018. "Boundary spanning and subordinate—leader trust: A tale of two acquisitions in a multicultural emerging economy," Post-Print hal-01744451, HAL.
    16. Juliane Reinecke & Shaz Ansari, 2015. "What Is a “Fair” Price? Ethics as Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 867-888, June.
    17. Yuan Li & Xiyuan Li & Qingmin Chen & Ying Xue, 2020. "Sustainable Career Development of Newly Hired Executives—A Dynamic Process Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Sally Maitlis & Scott Sonenshein, 2010. "Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights From Weick (1988)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 551-580, May.
    19. Demir, Robert, 2014. "Strategic Activity as Bundled Affordances," Ratio Working Papers 243, The Ratio Institute.
    20. Robyn Thomas & Leisa D. Sargent & Cynthia Hardy, 2011. "Managing Organizational Change: Negotiating Meaning and Power-Resistance Relations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 22-41, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01377087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.