Public Support for European Integration : A comparative analysis
AbstractThis paper proposes to study how socio-economic characteristics shape preferences in European matters. It is assumed that social groups threatened by liberalization tend to be more euro-skeptical than others. This hypothesis is tested using individual-level data from two rounds of the European Social Survey. Controlling for national fixed effects and income, we focus on variables of occupational status (International Standard Classification of Occupations ISCO-88, and current occupation). Finally, we include a variable of subjective partisan affiliation to make sure that our results are not concealing a left/right positioning. We argue that the economic status of agents plays a crucial role in explaining cross-sectional variations in public support for the European process in each member state. Additionally, the partisan affiliation confirms that in European matters, socio-economic forces are not a mere reflection of the left/right spectrum.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) with number halshs-00768907.
Date of creation: Dec 2012
Date of revision:
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00768907
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
European integration; political economy; globalization; survey research;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2013-01-19 (All new papers)
- NEP-EUR-2013-01-19 (Microeconomic European Issues)
- NEP-POL-2013-01-19 (Positive Political Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Demmou, Lilas & Amable, Bruno & Ledezma, Ivan, 2009. "The Lisbon Strategy and Structural Reforms in Europe," Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine 123456789/6926, Paris Dauphine University.
- Elvire Guillaud, 2011.
"Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis,"
Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne
11030, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Elvire Guillaud, 2011. "Preferences for redistribution : an empirical analysis," UniversitÃ© Paris1 PanthÃ©on-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00594072, HAL.
- Bruno Amable, 2007.
"La fin du modèle européen ?,"
UniversitÃ© Paris1 PanthÃ©on-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers)
- Rodrik, Dani, 1995. "Political economy of trade policy," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 28, pages 1457-1494 Elsevier.
- Elvire Guillaud & Stefano Palombarini, 2006. "Evolution des attentes sociales et comportement électoral : France, 1978-2002," PSE Working Papers halshs-00590295, HAL.
- Bruno Amable, 2007. "La fin du modèle européen ?," Post-Print hal-00185083, HAL.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.