IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gws/dpaper/20-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Back to the future. Counterfactual Scenarios Challenges, Methodology and an Empirical Test

Author

Listed:
  • Anke Mönnig

    (GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research)

  • Frank Hohmann

    (GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research)

Abstract

Forecasting has become an important part for policy planning. Economic forecasts offer guidance under conditions. They are used and/or produced by politicians, researchers, companies, associations or unions. They enter decision making processes and have an impact on state budget, consumption decision, personnel strategies – just to name a few. Ex-ante (policy) impact assessment (IA) is a forward-looking concept that has to deal with a lot of unknowns (e.g. natural disasters). The predicted impact is only valid within a certain framework or set of assumptions. However, it allows to pass judgements on the effectiveness and efficiency of planned measures. In many countries, impact assessments “has become an important tool for assisting policy makers in their decision-making process” (Großmann et al. 2016: 13). Due to its importance of (ex-ante) impact assessment, the questions arises regularly whether the forecasted results are robust. Or put differently: How good is the forecast? One method to answer this is to apply counterfactual forecasts. Such counterfactual scenarios or ex-post scenarios are, however, challenging to model. There can be two reasons for going “back to the future” and for facing this challenge: First, to test the accuracy of a forecasting model, or, second, to study the efficiency of an already implemented policy. While the first reasons produces a “first order” ex-post simulation, the second reason is a “second order” ex-post simulation where first order results are used as a baseline. Only first-order simulations can be compared to the already known real world. With some diagnostic checks – such as mean, relative or squared error tests – the model forecasting performance can be evaluated. However, the question is not if there are error terms to be observed but how big they are. Second-order scenarios can only be compared to first-order scenarios, not to actual data. In this paper, we introduce how to perform ex-post forecast with a macroeconometric input-output model. We take the example of COFORCE which has been developed to fore-cast the Chilean economy until 2035 (Mönnig & Bieritz 2019). The remainder of the paper is structured as follows: First, an overview about the challeng-es concerned with ex-post simulations is given. Then, the methodological approach is described. Next, an ex-post simulation is performed on the model COFORCE. The paper concludes with the main findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Anke Mönnig & Frank Hohmann, 2020. "Back to the future. Counterfactual Scenarios Challenges, Methodology and an Empirical Test," GWS Discussion Paper Series 20-1, GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:gws:dpaper:20-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://papers.gws-os.com/gws-paper20-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ash, J. C. K. & Smyth, D. J. & Heravi, S. M., 1990. "The accuracy of OECD forecasts of the international economy : Demand, output and prices," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 379-392, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krkoska, Libor & Teksoz, Utku, 2009. "How reliable are forecasts of GDP growth and inflation for countries with limited coverage?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 376-388, December.
    2. Roy Batchelor, 2001. "How useful are the forecasts of intergovernmental agencies? The IMF and OECD versus the consensus," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 225-235.
    3. Dikaios Tserkezos, 1996. "The dynamics of OECD forecasts for Greece," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(7), pages 427-429.
    4. Ash, J. C. K. & Smyth, D. J. & Heravi, S. M., 1998. "Are OECD forecasts rational and useful?: a directional analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 381-391, September.
    5. Tsuchiya, Yoichi, 2023. "Assessing the World Bank’s growth forecasts," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 64-84.
    6. Masahiro Ashiya, 2006. "Testing the rationality of forecast revisions made by the IMF and the OECD," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 25-36.
    7. Yoichi Tsuchiya, 2021. "Thirty‐year assessment of Asian Development Bank's forecasts," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 35(2), pages 18-40, November.
    8. Krkoska, Libor & Teksoz, Utku, 2007. "Accuracy of GDP growth forecasts for transition countries: Ten years of forecasting assessed," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 29-45.
    9. Antzoulatos, Angelos A., 1998. "Macroeconomic forecasts under the prism of error-correction models," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 535-550, November.
    10. Ash, J. C. K. & Smyth, D. J. & Heravi, S. M., 1997. "The accuracy of OECD forecasts of the international economy: balance of payments," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 969-987, December.
    11. Mihaela SIMIONESCU, 2014. "Improving The Inflation Rate Forecasts Of Romanian Experts Using A Fixed-Effects Models Approach," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 13, pages 87-102, June.
    12. Antzoulatos, Angelos A., 1996. "Consumer credit and consumption forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 439-453, December.
    13. H.O. Stekler & Huixia Zhang, 2013. "An evaluation of Chinese economic forecasts," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 251-259, November.
    14. Herman O. Stekler, 2008. "What Do We Know About G-7 Macro Forecasts?," Working Papers 2008-009, The George Washington University, Department of Economics, H. O. Stekler Research Program on Forecasting.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    counterfactual scenarios; macroeconometric model building; input-output;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gws:dpaper:20-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: GWS mbH (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gwsosde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.