This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Should R&D Champions be Protected from Foreign Takeovers? Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Katariina Nilsson Hakkala
Olivier Bertrand
Norbäck Pehr-Johan
Persson Lars
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
We analyze how the entry mode of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) affects affiliate R&D activities. Using unique affiliate level data for Swedish multinational firms, we first present empirical evidence that acquired affiliates have a higher level of R&D intensity than Greenfield (start-up) affiliates. This gap persists over time and with the age of the affiliates, as well as for different firm types and industries. To explain this finding, we develop an acquisitioninvestment-oligopoly model where we show that for a foreign acquisition to take place in equilibrium, the acquiring MNE must invest sufficiently in sequential R&D in the affiliate. Otherwise, rivals will expand their business, thus making the acquisition unprofitable. Two additional predictions of the model ? that foreign firms acquire high-quality domestic firms and that the gap in R&D between acquired and greenfield affiliates decreases in acquisition transaction costs ? are consistent with the data. JEL classification: F23, L10, L20, O30
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT) in its series Discussion Papers with number
459.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 07 Nov 2008Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fer:dpaper:459Contact details of provider: Postal: Arkadiankatu 7, P.O. Box 1279, FI-00101 Helsinki Phone: +358 40 304 5500 Fax: +358 9 4780 2929 Email: Web page: http://www.vatt.fi/ More information through EDIRC
Order Information: Email:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Anita Niskanen).
Keywords: FDI ; M&A ; R&D ; Multinational Firms ; Other versions of this item:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports :
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Markusen, James R, 1995.
"The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade ,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives ,
American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 169-89, Spring.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Olivier Bertrand & Habib Zitouna, 2006.
"Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring: The Role of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions ,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 15(2), pages 479-515, 06.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Andrew B. Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jensen & Samuel Kortum, 2003.
"Plants and Productivity in International Trade ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1268-1290, September.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Andrew B Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jensen & Samuel Kortum, 2000.
"Plants and productivity in international trade ,"
Working Papers
00-08, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
[Downloadable!] Andrew B. Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jenson & Samuel Kortum, 2000.
"Plants and Productivity in International Trade ,"
NBER Working Papers
7688, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Andrew B. Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jensen & Samuel Kortum, 2000.
"Plants and Productivity in International Trade ,"
Boston University - Institute for Economic Development
105, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development.
[Downloadable!] Andrew B. Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jensen & Samuel Kortum, 2000.
"Plants and Productivity in International Trade ,"
Trade Working Papers
161, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
[Downloadable!] Kjell Erik Lommerud & Odd Rune Straume & Lars Sorgard, 2006.
"National Versus International Mergers in Unionized Oligopoly ,"
RAND Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 37(1), pages 212-233, Spring.
Other versions: Markusen, James R., 2002.
"Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade ,"
MPRA Paper
8380, University Library of Munich, Germany.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Horn, Henrik & Persson, Lars, 2001.
"The equilibrium ownership of an international oligopoly ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 307-333, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Horn, Henrik & Persson, Lars, 1999.
"The Equilibrium Ownership of an International Oligopoly ,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
2302, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Horn, Henrik & Persson, Lars, 1999.
"The Equilibrium Ownership of an International Oligopoly ,"
Working Paper Series
515, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
[Downloadable!] Horn, H. & Persson, L., 1999.
"The Equilibrium Ownership of an International Oligopoly ,"
Research Institute of Industrial Economics Working Papers
515, Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN).
Hakanson, Lars & Nobel, Robert, 1993.
"Foreign research and development in Swedish multinationals ,"
Research Policy ,
Elsevier, vol. 22(5-6), pages 373-396, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
J. Peter Neary, 2007.
"Cross-Border Mergers as Instruments of Comparative Advantage ,"
Review of Economic Studies ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 74(4), pages 1229-1257, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
J Peter Neary, 2004.
"Cross-Border Mergers as Instruments of Comparative Advantage ,"
Working Papers
200404, School Of Economics, University College Dublin.
[Downloadable!] Neary, J Peter, 2004.
"Cross-Border Mergers as Instruments of Comparative Advantage ,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
4325, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) J. Peter Neary, 2004.
"Cross-Border Mergers as Instruments of Comparative Advantage ,"
cege â Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers
34, cege – Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research, University of Goettingen (Germany)..
[Downloadable!] Neary, J Peter, 2002.
"Foreign Competition and Wage Inequality ,"
Review of International Economics ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(4), pages 680-93, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Girma, Sourafel & Greenaway, David & Wakelin, Katharine, 2001.
"Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK? ,"
Scottish Journal of Political Economy ,
Scottish Economic Society, vol. 48(2), pages 119-33, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Keith Head & John Ries, 1997.
"International Mergers and Welfare under Decentralized Competition Policy ,"
Canadian Journal of Economics ,
Canadian Economics Association, vol. 30(4), pages 1104-23, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Bjorvatn, Kjetil, 2004.
"Economic integration and the profitability of cross-border mergers and acquisitions ,"
European Economic Review ,
Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1211-1226, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Norback, Pehr-Johan & Persson, Lars, 2007.
"Investment liberalization -- Why a restrictive cross-border merger policy can be counterproductive ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 366-380, July.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Norbäck, Pehr-Johan & Persson, Lars, 2006.
"Investment Lilberalization - Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy can be Counterproductive ,"
Working Paper Series
666, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
[Downloadable!] Norbäck, Pehr-Johan & Persson, Lars, 2005.
"Investment Liberalization - Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy can be Counterproductive ,"
Working Paper Series
644, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
[Downloadable!] Elhanan Helpman & Marc J. Melitz & Stephen R. Yeaple, 2004.
"Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 94(1), pages 300-316, March.
[Downloadable!]
Norback, Pehr-Johan, 2001.
"Multinational firms, technology and location ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 449-469, August.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Norbäck, Pehr-Johan, 1999.
"Multinational Firms, Technology and Location ,"
Working Paper Series
512, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 02 Nov 2000.
[Downloadable!] Norback, P.-J., 1999.
"Multinational Firms, Technology and Location ,"
Research Institute of Industrial Economics Working Papers
512, Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN).
Ekholm, K. & Hesselman, M., 2000.
"The Foreign Operations of Swedish Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from a Survey of Swedish Multinationals 1998 ,"
Research Institute of Industrial Economics Working Papers
540, Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN).
Other versions: Mattoo, Aaditya & Olarreaga, Marcelo & Saggi, Kamal, 2004.
"Mode of foreign entry, technology transfer, and FDI policy ,"
Journal of Development Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 95-111, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? About 2700 working paper series are listed on RePEc .
This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .