IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/euf/ecobri/027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Dutch Budgetary Framework and the European Fiscal Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Hauke Vierke
  • Maarten Masselink

Abstract

The Netherlands has a unique budgetary framework that is built around multiannual expenditure ceilings. The underlying principle is that budgetary policy should be trend-based, with a longer-term perspective. Independent macroeconomic forecasts and non-partisan evaluation of the budget plans have a longstanding tradition and predate similar requirements set at the European level. A central element of the national framework is the commitment of a government to adhere to pre-agreed expenditure ceilings over a four-year term. However, experience with meeting the European fiscal targets is mixed, and it appears that the Dutch framework does not necessarily ensure compliance with the European objectives. This note discusses possible reasons for this discrepancy. When compared along different dimensions, the operational objectives of the domestic and EU frameworks are not fully aligned. Long-run sustainability is assessed differently at the national and the EU level. Also, the medium-term objective is not fully operationalised within the national context. Finally, there are methodological differences with regard to the expenditure rules. Overall, this may lead to a dilemma for Dutch policy makers, who use the same policy instruments to fulfil different policy objectives. The current initiative at the EU level towards a greater emphasis on the expenditure benchmark offers an opportunity to bring the Dutch framework closer to the European one. Nevertheless, this analysis is non-exhaustive and a further discussion could identify possible ways to align the objectives, while preserving the successful elements of the Dutch budgetary framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Hauke Vierke & Maarten Masselink, 2017. "The Dutch Budgetary Framework and the European Fiscal Rules," European Economy - Economic Briefs 027, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
  • Handle: RePEc:euf:ecobri:027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/eb027_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frits Bos, 2008. "The Dutch fiscal framework: History, current practice and the role of the central planning bureau," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 1-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolf Heinrich Reuter & Oļegs Tkačevs & Kārlis Vilerts, 2022. "Fiscal rules and volatility: the role of stabilising properties and compliance," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 21-52, February.
    2. European Fiscal Board (EFB), 2017. "2017 annual report of the European Fiscal Board," Annual reports 2017, European Fiscal Board.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Škare, Marinko & Mošnja-Škare, Lorena, 2019. "Economic policy implications of the Gibson Law in the Netherlands (1800–2012)," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 926-942.
    2. Thiess Büttner & Björn Kauder, 2008. "Methods of Revenue Forecasting: An International Comparison," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 44.
    3. Frits Bos & Coen Teulings, 2012. "The world’s oldest fiscal watchdog: CPB’s analyses foster consensus on economic policy," CPB Discussion Paper 207, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Thiess Buettner & Bjoern Kauder, 2010. "Revenue Forecasting Practices: Differences across Countries and Consequences for Forecasting Performance," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 31(3), pages 313-340, September.
    5. Frits Bos & Thomas van der Pol & Gerbert Romijn, 2018. "Should CBA’s include a correction for the marginal excess burden of taxation?," CPB Discussion Paper 370.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Frits Bos, 2009. "The Art And Craft Of Compiling National Accounts Statistics And Their Implications For Reliability," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 55(4), pages 930-958, December.
    7. Bos, Frits & Zwaneveld, Peter, 2017. "Cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management and water governance in the Netherlands; an overview of one century," MPRA Paper 80933, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Bos, Frits, 2012. "Four centuries of fiscal decentralisation in the Netherlands in view of different economic theoretic perspectives," MPRA Paper 57566, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    9. Carmen M. Reinhart & Vincent R. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2012. "Public Debt Overhangs: Advanced-Economy Episodes since 1800," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(3), pages 69-86, Summer.
    10. Bos, Frits & Teulings, Coen N, 2012. "The world’s oldest fiscal watchdog: CPB’s analyses foster consensus on economic policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 8902, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Van Dijk, Jasper & Schuster, Florian & Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa & Ziesemer, Vinzenz, 2022. "Building on the proposal by the EU-Commission for reforming the Stability and Growth Pact," Papers 277916, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    12. Charles Wyplosz, 2012. "Fiscal Rules: Theoretical Issues and Historical Experiences," NBER Chapters, in: Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis, pages 495-525, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Frits Bos & Coen Teulings, 2013. "Short- and long-term forecasting by the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB): Science, witchcraft, or practical tool for policy?," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 45-56.
    14. Coen Teulings & Frits Bos, 2010. "CPB and Dutch fiscal policy in view of the financial crisis and ageing," CPB Document 218.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    15. Bernard Steunenberg, 2021. "The politics within institutions for regulating public spending: conditional compliance within multi-year budgets," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 31-51, March.
    16. Bos, Frits & Teulings, Coen, 2011. "Evaluating election platforms: a task for fiscal councils? Scope and rules of the game in view of 25 years of Dutch practice," MPRA Paper 31536, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Frits Bos & Thomas van der Pol & Gerbert Romijn, 2018. "Should CBA’s include a correction for the marginal excess burden of taxation?," CPB Discussion Paper 370, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    18. Frits Bos, 2010. "Fiscal decentralisation in the Netherlands: History, current practice and economic theory," CPB Document 214.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    19. Larch, Martin & Claeys, Peter & Van Der Wielen, Wouter, 2022. "The scarring effects of major economic downturns: The role of fiscal policy and government investment," EIB Working Papers 2022/14, European Investment Bank (EIB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budgetary framework; expenditure rules; stability and growth pact; fiscal sustainability; The Netherlands; Vierke; Masselink.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:euf:ecobri:027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECFIN INFO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dg2ecbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.