IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/euf/ecobri/026.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Taxation of Company Cars in Belgium – Room to Reduce their Favourable Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Savina Princen

Abstract

The labour tax system in Belgium counts numerous tax expenditures and special regimes. The tax treatment of company cars is among the most costly tax expenditures, since the use of a company car as a remuneration component is particularly favourable both for employers and employees. The employee is taxed on an estimated value of the private use of a company car that is considerably less than its real value. For employers, the main tax advantage is that, unlike salaries, the benefit of using a company car is not subject to the regular system of employers' social security contributions. The favourable tax treatment for company cars has a high budgetary cost, accounting for approximately EUR 3.75 billion of revenue foregone (0.9% of GDP in 2016) annually. Moreover, the Belgian company car scheme favours road travel and dilutes the incentives to reduce fuel consumption provided by energy and vehicle taxation. This imposes welfare costs to society by aggravating air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the favourable tax treatment of company cars in Belgium has regularly been raised in the context of the European Semester. As a way to counter the preferential treatment of company cars, the government plans to extend the scheme to other means of commuting by providing a so-called 'mobility budget'. Rather than having a company car as part of its remuneration package, an employee could opt for a transport budget or an additional net pay. This note discusses the taxation of company cars in Belgium and analyses the extent to which a mobility budget can tackle the negative outcomes of the existing company car scheme. The note also compares the Belgian company car scheme with that of other Member States. It finds that Belgium provides relatively high subsidies for the private use of company cars, which weigh on the efficiency and revenue potential of the Belgian tax system. In light of these findings, the note suggests a number of ways how company car taxation in Belgium could be improved. First, the private use of a company car could receive the same treatment for social security purposes as other forms of remuneration. Furthermore and for the sake of neutrality, it could be considered to increase the taxable benefit of a company car and to include a distance component. Additional revenue generated by taxing company cars in a more neutral way could be used to decrease labour taxes for those most affected by the adjustment of the tax system.

Suggested Citation

  • Savina Princen, 2017. "Taxation of Company Cars in Belgium – Room to Reduce their Favourable Treatment," European Economy - Economic Briefs 026, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
  • Handle: RePEc:euf:ecobri:026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/eb026_en_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher May, 2017. ": 40 years on," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 2223-2241, October.
    2. Michelle Harding, 2014. "Personal Tax Treatment of Company Cars and Commuting Expenses: Estimating the Fiscal and Environmental Costs," OECD Taxation Working Papers 20, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frederik Priem & Philip Stessens & Frank Canters, 2020. "Microsimulation of Residential Activity for Alternative Urban Development Scenarios: A Case Study on Brussels and Flemish Brabant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Frederik Priem & Philip Stessens & Frank Canters, 2020. "Microsimulation of residential activity for alternative urban development scenarios: A case study on brussels and flemish brabant," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/305003, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Malte Zoubek, 2018. "Spatial Productivity Differences and the Optimal Tax Treatment of Commuting Expenses," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 187-18, Universität Siegen, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht.
    2. Jonas Boone & Johannes Derboven & Sarah Kuypers & Francesco Figari & Gerlinde Verbist, 2019. "EWIGE 2 Update and Extension of the EUROMOD Wealth Taxation Project," JRC Working Papers on Taxation & Structural Reforms 2019-07, Joint Research Centre.
    3. DE BORGER, Bruno & PROOST, Stef, 2015. "Tax and regulatory policies for European transport - getting there, but in the slow lane," Working Papers 2015009, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Samuel Nello-Deakin & Marco te Brömmelstroet, 2021. "Scaling up cycling or replacing driving? Triggers and trajectories of bike–train uptake in the Randstad area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3239-3267, December.
    5. Nikodinoska, Dragana & Schröder, Carsten, 2016. "On the emissions–inequality and emissions–welfare trade-offs in energy taxation: Evidence on the German car fuels tax," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 206-233.
    6. Mustafa Şeref AKIN, 2020. "High Cost of Venture Capital and Investment Strategy Startups Should Follow," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 70(1), pages 229-245, June.
    7. Jooyeon Jamie Im & Binna Kim & Jaeuk Hwang & Jieun E Kim & Jung Yoon Kim & Sandy Jeong Rhie & Eun Namgung & Ilhyang Kang & Sohyeon Moon & In Kyoon Lyoo & Chang-hyun Park & Sujung Yoon, 2017. "Diagnostic potential of multimodal neuroimaging in posttraumatic stress disorder," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Münzel, Christiane & Plötz, Patrick & Sprei, Frances & Gnann, Till, 2019. "How large is the effect of financial incentives on electric vehicle sales? – A global review and European analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Evelyn Balsells & Laurence Guillot & Harish Nair & Moe H Kyaw, 2017. "Serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing invasive disease in children in the post-PCV era: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Xavier May & Thomas Ermans & Nils Hooftman, 2019. "Les voitures de société : diagnostics et enjeux d’un régime fiscal," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/301876, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Saidur Rahaman & Selim Jahangir & Md Senaul Haque & Ruishan Chen & Pankaj Kumar, 2021. "Spatio-temporal changes of green spaces and their impact on urban environment of Mumbai, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6481-6501, April.
    12. Jacobs, Leif & Quack, Lara & Mechtel, Mario, 2022. "Distributional effects of carbon pricing by transport fuel taxation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Meital Peleg-Mizrachi & Alon Tal, 2019. "Caveats in Environmental Justice, Consumption and Ecological Footprints: The Relationship and Policy Implications of Socioeconomic Rank and Sustainable Consumption Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Zijlstra, Toon & Goos, Peter & Verhetsel, Ann, 2019. "A mixture-amount stated preference study on the mobility budget," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 230-246.
    15. Peter Kasten, 2022. "Klimaschutz im Verkehrssektor: Klimaorientiertes und sozial gerechtes Marktdesign [Climate Protection in the Transport Sector: Climate-Oriented and Socially Fairer Market Design Necessary]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(1), pages 22-28, May.
    16. Leif Jacobs & Lara Quack & Mario Mechtel, 2021. "Distributional Effects of Carbon Pricing by Transport Fuel Taxation," Working Paper Series in Economics 405, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:euf:ecobri:026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECFIN INFO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dg2ecbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.