IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002625/3137.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of R&D investments on the economic growth of the Czech Republic – a recursively dynamic CGE approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Smeets Kristkova

Abstract

Developed economies are facing a problem of declining competitiveness on a global scale. The perspectives for sustaining the world economic leadership are associated with stimulating technological progress through innovations and investments to R&D. This is a challenge for the private sector but also for governments in prioritizing their policies in line with the goal of sustaining the competitive advantage. Within the EU, the debates are often centered on the effective allocation of subsidies from the EU budget, in which certain support of policies, such as the Common Agricultural Policy, occupy a considerable part. However, the ideas of reallocation of the agricultural subsidies to the prospective sectors of the economy such as the sector of Research and Development should be supported with a thorough research, revealing possible impacts on the whole economy. Computable General Equilibrium models provide appropriate instruments in assessing the ex-ante impact of different policy scenarios. However, in the field of Research and Development, standard CGE models do not capture properly the R&D effects, due to several reasons. First of all, the national accounts usually do not explicitly involve the investments to R&D; second, the sector of R&D included in the input-output tables does not capture all investments into Research and development. Third and most important, the R&D activities are not capitalized properly to stimulate the economic growth. This paper investigates how results obtained with standard CGE models can be improved by incorporating the effects of the R&D activities in a recursively-dynamic CGE model built for the economy of the Czech Republic. The main objective of the paper is to quantify the impact of the R&D activities on the long-term economic growth of the Czech Republic in the recursively dynamic CGE framework. Furthermore, the aim is to assess the efficiency of the governmental support under different policy options. The results of this paper are part of a research grant of the Czech Science Foundation “ Evaluation of Research and Development Effects on the Economic Growth of the Czech Republic with the Use of a Computable General Equilibrium model“. Paul Romer (1990) is considered as a founder of the R&D based endogenous growth theory. His work was later conceptualized in the CGE framework by Diao, Roe and Yeldan (1999) which involved imperfect competition and forward-looking dynamization. Nevertheless, various recent practical applications of the R&D based theory of economic growth have been performed in the recursively dynamic framework. Furthermore, an extensive experience with modeling R&D activities can be found in climate change oriented CGE models, in which the investments to R&D are considered as a source of technological progress required for the mitigation of the climate change effects. Recent contributions on the R&D effects in the recursive CGE models can be found in the works of Garau and Lecca (2008), Youngchang et al. (2010), Wang et al. (2009) and Zürn et al. (2007). In these contributions, the incorporation of R&D is usually based on the accumulation of knowledge as a function of the R&D investments. Specific features can be found in Garau and Lecca, who apply this approach to a regional CGE model of Sardinia. Youngchang et al. disaggregate the Taiwanese R&D investments into public and private in order to compare their efficiency. Zürn addresses the issue of different options of subsidizing the R&D activities in a multi-region CGE model. Wang et al. draw from Zürn´s method of knowledge accounting and focus on the different mitigation commitments to reach China’s climate policy obligations. Following the recent approaches, this paper incorporates the R&D effects into a recursively dynamic CGE model built for the economy of the Czech Republic. The model follows a standard IFPRI structure (Lofgren, 2002) and is described in detail in Křístková (2010). The model is calibrated on the economy of the Czech Republic in 2008 and provides simulations until 2020. As an extension to previous approaches, different types of R&D activities are distinguished. Whereas R&D originated in private companies can be directly attributable to specific industries (such as innovations, patents etc), R&D carried out in public institutions is not easily appropriable (such as of the basic research) and can provide positive externalities to all sectors of the economy. In view of this, R&D stemming from the enterprise sector directly increases the stock of knowledge in the economy, which is modeled as an intangible production factor appropriable in each production sector. The results of the public R&D activities are capitalized in form of increasing Total Factor Productivity in all sectors of the economy. A survey of the Czech Statistical Office carried out at the companies involved in the R&D activities is used to calibrate the SAM. Furthermore, the aim is to carry out econometric estimates to properly quantify the spillover effects of the public research and development activities on the TFP. The CGE model is applied in three scenarios. The first scenario – baseline – provides the growth rates of the economy under current governmental support scheme. In particular, the attention is devoted to the dynamics of growth with the incorporation of the R&D effects, which is higher than in the model which omits the R&D effects. The second scenario focuses on comparing the impact of enterprise and public RD on the economic growth which reveals the efficiency of governmental support to both sectors. Finally, the effects of reallocation of subsidies from agriculture to both R&D sectors are analyzed. The results show that by capturing the R&D effects through knowledge accumulation and TFP growth, the reallocation of subsidies from agriculture to RD brings positive effects, as opposed to results driven from standard CGE models.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Smeets Kristkova, 2011. "Impact of R&D investments on the economic growth of the Czech Republic – a recursively dynamic CGE approach," EcoMod2011 3137, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002625:3137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Kristkova_Azores_Final_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrizio LECCA & Giorgio GARAU, 2008. "Impact Analysis of Regional Knowledge Subsidy: a CGE Approach Applied to Sardinia," EcoMod2008 23800076, EcoMod.
    2. Kejak, Michal & Seiter, Stephan & Vavra, David, 2004. "Accession trajectories and convergence: endogenous growth perspective," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 13-46, March.
    3. Arjan Lejour & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, 2008. "International spillovers of domestic reforms: the joint application of the Lisbon Strategy in the EU," CPB Discussion Paper 105.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. G. Garau & P. Lecca, 2008. "Impact Analysis of Regional Knowledge Subsidy: a CGE Approach," Working Paper CRENoS 200811, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    5. Arjan Lejour & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, 2008. "International spillovers of domestic reforms: the joint application of the Lisbon Strategy in the EU," CPB Discussion Paper 105, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Kamil Dybczak & David Vonka & Nico van der Windt, 2008. "The Effect of Oil Price Shocks on the Czech Economy," Working Papers 2008/5, Czech National Bank.
    7. Gillingham, Kenneth & Newell, Richard G. & Pizer, William A., 2008. "Modeling endogenous technological change for climate policy analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 2734-2753, November.
    8. Wang, Ke & Wang, Can & Chen, Jining, 2009. "Analysis of the economic impact of different Chinese climate policy options based on a CGE model incorporating endogenous technological change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2930-2940, August.
    9. Siddiqi, Yusuf Salem, Meir, 2006. "A Proposal for Treating Research and Development As Capital Expenditures in the Canadian SNA," Economic Analysis (EA) Research Paper Series 2006040e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    10. Fernando Galindo-Rueda, 2007. "Developing an R&D satellite account for the UK: a preliminary analysis," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 1(12), pages 18-29, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zuzana Křístková, 2012. "Impact of R&D Investment on Economic Growth of the Czech Republic - A Recursively Dynamic CGE Approach," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(4), pages 412-433.
    2. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:2013:y:2013:i:4:id:432:p:412-433 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zuzana KRISTKOVA, 2013. "Analysis of Private R&D Effects in a CGE Model with Capital Varieties: The Case of the Czech Republic," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 63(3), pages 262-287, July.
    4. Lecca, Patrizio & McGregor, Peter G. & Swales, J. Kim, 2013. "Forward-looking and myopic regional Computable General Equilibrium models: How significant is the distinction?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 160-176.
    5. Gomes, Alexandre & Perobelli, Fernando & Pio, João, 2016. "The Impact of expenditure on R & D within the Brazilian economy: an approach to Computable General Equilibrium," Conference papers 330169, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Eva Gutiérrez-i-Puigarnau & Ismir Mulalic & Jos N. van Ommeren, 2016. "Do rich households live farther away from their workplaces?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 177-201.
    7. Dinh, Huong, 2009. "Sectoral Impact of Barriers to Trade in Banking Services: A Cost and Profit-based Approach," Conference papers 331883, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. An, Kangxin & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia, 2023. "Low-carbon technology diffusion and economic growth of China: an evolutionary general equilibrium framework," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 253-263.
    9. Yasin MIMIR, 2010. "Financial Intermediaries, Leverage Ratios, and Business Cycles," EcoMod2010 259600116, EcoMod.
    10. Wei Jin, 2012. "Can Technological Innovation Help China Take on Its Climate Responsibility? A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," CAMA Working Papers 2012-51, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    11. Jin, Wei, 2012. "Can technological innovation help China take on its climate responsibility? An intertemporal general equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 629-641.
    12. Zuzana Smeets Kristkova & Michiel van Dijk & Hans van Meijl, 2015. "Long-term projections of global food security with R&D-driven technological progress," EcoMod2015 8601, EcoMod.
    13. Jacques Pelkmans & Lourdes Acedo Montoya & Alessandro Maravalle, 2008. "How product market reforms lubricate shock adjustment in the euro area," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 341, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    14. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    15. Emanuele Massetti & Lea Nicita, 2010. "The Optimal Climate Policy Portfolio when Knowledge Spills across Sectors," CESifo Working Paper Series 2988, CESifo.
    16. Francesco Lamperti & Giovanni Dosi & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini & Alessandro Sapio, 2018. "And then he wasn't a she : Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model," Working Papers hal-03443464, HAL.
    17. Carol Corrado & Jonathan Haskel & Cecilia Jona-Lasinio & Massimiliano Iommi, 2012. "Intangible Capital and Growth in Advanced Economies: Measurement Methods and Comparative Results," Economics Program Working Papers 12-03, The Conference Board, Economics Program.
    18. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    19. Michal Kejak & David Vavra, 2004. "Factor Accumulation Story: Any Unfinished Business?," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp220, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    20. Mort Webster & Karen Fisher-Vanden & David Popp & Nidhi Santen, 2017. "Should We Give Up after Solyndra? Optimal Technology R&D Portfolios under Uncertainty," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(S1), pages 123-151.
    21. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002625:3137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.