Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Inequality And The Dual Economy: Technology Adoption With Specific And General Skills

Contents:

Author Info

  • Ashley Lester

    ()

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Slow technology diffusion has important consequences for income inequality. Across countries, it can account for much of world inequality. Within countries, the arrival of new technologies often causes popular concern that the wages of some workers will fall. In developing countries, diffusion is often represented in the stylized form of a "dual economy," in which a gradually increasing fraction of workers use modern technology, while the remainder use traditional technology. This paper generates this pattern of technology adoption endogenously, and shows that it causes the wages of some workers to fall. Diffusion is slow because production requires both skills that are equally useful with any vintage of technology and skills that are imperfectly transferable across vintages. When these skills are sufficiently specific, a dual economy is optimal, even though the intermediate technologies are also available. Workers with transferable skills disproportionately join the modern sector, leaving those with specific skills worse off. As in classical trade models, changes in factor supplies affect the allocation of labor across sectors, but not factor rewards. A dynamic extension shows that workers without transferable skills become worse off throughout the period of transition to the modern technology. A further dynamic extension applies the model to developed countries.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://cbe.anu.edu.au/research/papers/camawpapers/Papers/2006/Lester_12006.pdf
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Cama Admin)
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University in its series CAMA Working Papers with number 2006-01.

    as in new window
    Length: 31 pages
    Date of creation: Dec 2005
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:een:camaaa:2006-01

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Crawford Building, Lennox Crossing, Building #132, Canberra ACT 0200
    Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
    Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
    Email:
    Web page: http://cama.crawford.anu.edu.au
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Kremer, M., 1996. "How Much Does Sorting Increase Inequality?," Working papers, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics 96-18, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
    2. Chari, V V & Hopenhayn, Hugo, 1991. "Vintage Human Capital, Growth, and the Diffusion of New Technology," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(6), pages 1142-65, December.
    3. Daron Acemoglu, 1999. "Changes in Unemployment and Wage Inequality: An Alternative Theory and Some Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1259-1278, December.
    4. George E. Johnson, 1997. "Changes in Earnings Inequality: The Role of Demand Shifts," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 41-54, Spring.
    5. Nancy L. Stokey, 1990. "Human Capital, Product Quality, And Growth," NBER Working Papers 3413, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Kremer, Michael, 1993. "The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 108(3), pages 551-75, August.
    7. Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones, 1999. "Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 114(1), pages 83-116, February.
    8. Feinstein, Charles H., 1998. "Pessimism Perpetuated: Real Wages and the Standard of Living in Britain during and after the Industrial Revolution," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(03), pages 625-658, September.
    9. David Card & Thomas Lemieux, 2001. "Can Falling Supply Explain The Rising Return To College For Younger Men? A Cohort-Based Analysis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 116(2), pages 705-746, May.
    10. Paul Beaudry & David A. Green, 2005. "Changes in U.S. Wages, 19762000: Ongoing Skill Bias or Major Technological Change?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(3), pages 609-648, July.
    11. Keller, Wolfgang, 1996. "Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 199-227, April.
    12. Katz, Lawrence F & Murphy, Kevin M, 1992. "Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 107(1), pages 35-78, February.
    13. Broadberry, Stephen & Ghosal, Sayantan, 2002. "From the Counting House to the Modern Office: Explaining Anglo-American Productivity Differences in Services, 1870 1990," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(04), pages 967-998, December.
    14. Parente, Stephen L & Prescott, Edward C, 1994. "Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(2), pages 298-321, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:camaaa:2006-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cama Admin).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.