Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

How Heavy Is A Job?: A Critical Survey of Job Evaluation as a Payment Device

Contents:

Author Info

  • Monojit Chatterji
  • Stephen Devlin
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This paper provides a summary of the purpose, practice and history of job evaluation in its primary role as a compensation system. It critically reviews the implicit assumptions made in the construction and application of the procedure with specific reference to PwC’s evaluation of the salary structure of the Welsh Assembly in 2004.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.dundee.ac.uk/media/dundeewebsite/economicstudies/documents/discussion/DDPE_259.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Economic Studies, University of Dundee in its series Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics with number 259.

    as in new window
    Length: 13 pages
    Date of creation: Sep 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:dun:dpaper:259

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Dundee, DD1 4HN
    Phone: (01382) 344375
    Fax: (01382) 344691
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.dundee.ac.uk/econman/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: job evaluation; compensation systems;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dun:dpaper:259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andrzej Kwiatkowski).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.