Price Undertakings, VERs, and Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Foreign Rivalry
AbstractAntidumping (AD) petitions are often withdrawn in favor of VERs and price undertakings. We compare foreign firms' incentive to engage in foreign direct investment (FDI) under a VER and a price undertaking, with special emphasis on foreign rivalry. We show that a VER is less likely to induce FDI than a price undertaking or AD. Thus, the importing country can increase the level of protection by replacing an AD duty with a VER. This may account for the GATT ban on VERs, given the proliferation of AD cases during the 1990s.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University in its series ISER Discussion Paper with number 0693.
Date of creation: Jul 2007
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
- Jota Ishikawa & Kaz Miyagiwa, 2008. "Price undertakings, VERs, and foreign direct investment: the case of foreign rivalry," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 954-970, August.
- F1 - International Economics - - Trade
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fumiko Matsumoto).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.