IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dia/wpaper/dt200909.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le paradoxe de Sikasso : coton et pauvreté au Mali

Author

Listed:
  • Jocelyne Delarue

    (AFD, Département de la Recherche)

  • Sandrine Mesplé-Somps

    (DIAL, IRD, Paris)

  • Jean-David Naudet

    (AFD, Département de la Recherche)

  • Anne-Sophie Robilliard

    (DIAL, IRD, Paris)

Abstract

(english) In Mali, the situation of cotton growing households has traditionally been considered as more favorable than that of food crop producers. However, official statistics on poverty suggest that the cotton growing region of Sikasso is among the poorest regions of the country and that cotton producers are on average poorer than all other farmers. This article offers a detailed analysis of this paradox, the so-called Sikasso paradox. The official statistics on poverty are set out and data and methodological issues are exposed.The reworking of the data led to the conclusion that cotton producers have an “advantage” over other farmers. This analysis underlines the need for open debate concerning data – an oft neglected step in the analysis of development policy. _________________________________ (français) Au Mali, il est entendu que la situation des producteurs de coton est meilleure que celle des producteurs de produits viviers. Cependant, les statistiques officielles de la pauvreté suggèrent que la région de Sikasso - région dans la quelle le coton est essentiellement cultivé fait partie des régions les plus pauvres du pays et que les producteurs de coton sont en moyenne plus pauvres que les autres agriculteurs. Cet article examine en détail ce paradoxe, souvent nommé le paradoxe de Sikasso, ainsi que ses enjeux en termes d’économie politique du « chiffre ». Nous analysons en détail les statistiques officielles et les problèmes méthodologiques qu’elles posent. Nous montrons que finalement les producteurs de coton connaissent de meilleures conditions de vie que les autres agriculteurs. La conclusion d’un tel cas d’étude n’est évidemment pas de se détourner de la mesure des conditions de vie des populations. L’exemple de Sikasso plaide au contraire pour que les évaluateurs et concepteurs de politiques publiques accordent une importance première à la fabrication des données, et que ces dernières fassent l’objet d’un débat contradictoire. Dans tous les instruments de pilotage, de conception et d’évaluation des politiques publiques, la collecte et le traitement des données devraient sans doute recueillir une attention au moins aussi importante que leur analyse, et susciter tout autant la contradiction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jocelyne Delarue & Sandrine Mesplé-Somps & Jean-David Naudet & Anne-Sophie Robilliard, 2009. "Le paradoxe de Sikasso : coton et pauvreté au Mali," Working Papers DT/2009/09, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
  • Handle: RePEc:dia:wpaper:dt200909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dial.ird.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2009-09.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2009
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsimpo, Clarence & Wodon, Quentin, 2007. "Poverty among Cotton Producers: Evidence from West and Central Africa," MPRA Paper 10484, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Kelly, Valerie A. & Tefft, James F. & Oehmke, James F. & Staatz, John M., 2004. "Identifying Policy Relevant Variables For Reducing Childhood Malnutrition In Rural Mali," Staff Paper Series 11528, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4351 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Isabel Günther & Mohamed Ali Marouani & Marc Raffinot, 2006. "La croissance est-elle pro-pauvres au Mali ?," Working Papers DT/2006/15, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delpeuch, Claire & Vandeplas, Anneleen, 2013. "Revisiting the “Cotton Problem”—A Comparative Analysis of Cotton Reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 209-221.
    2. Alfani, Federica & Azzarri, Carlo & d'Errico, Marco & Molini, Vasco, 2012. "Poverty in Mozambique : new evidence from recent household surveys," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6217, The World Bank.
    3. Sékou Amadou Traoré & Christoph Reiber & Bekele Megersa & Anne Valle Zárate, 2018. "Contribution of cattle of different breeds to household food security in southern Mali," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(3), pages 549-560, June.
    4. Eozenou, Patrick & Madani, Dorsati & Swinkels, Rob, 2013. "Poverty, malnutrition and vulnerability in Mali," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6561, The World Bank.
    5. Vincent Geronimi & Claire Mainguy & Rémi Generoso & Ibrahima Cisse, 2013. "The Cotton Sector in Mali Trapped in Asset Poverty ? [Le secteur coton au Mali dans un piège de sous-accumulation ?]," Post-Print hal-01753874, HAL.
    6. Collins, Julia C. & Foltz, Jeremy D., 2013. "Gender Production Differentials In Africa," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150130, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Sanga, Udita & Sidibé, Amadou & Olabisi, Laura Schmitt, 2021. "Dynamic pathways of barriers and opportunities for food security and climate adaptation in Southern Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4303 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4543 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Abdelhamid EL BOUHADI & Abdelkader ELKHIDER & El Mustapha KCHIRID, 2010. "Can Economic Growth Be Pro-Poor In Morocco?. The No-Monetary Approach," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 10(2).
    4. Loesse Jacques Esso, 2012. "Is Economic Growth In Cote D'Ivoire Pro-Poor? Evidence From Lsms Data: A Note," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 575-580, October.
    5. Koloma, Yaya, 2022. "Mali’s Fragility: Root Causes and Potential Recovery Pathways," MPRA Paper 112821, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. repec:wbk:wbpubs:12362 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Prospère Backiny-Yetna & Franck Adoho & Issa Bouaré & Virginie Briand & Kassim Dabitao & Assa Gakou & Estelle Sommeiller & Dramane Traoré & Clarence Tsimpo & Quentin Wodon, 2009. "Tendance, profil et déterminants de la pauvreté au Mali de 2001 à 2006," Perspective Afrique, Association Africaine pour les Sciences sociales, vol. 4(1-3), pages 1-24.
    8. A. Lourme-Ruiz & S. Dury & Y. Martin-Prével, 2021. "Linkages between dietary diversity and indicators of agricultural biodiversity in Burkina Faso [Les liens entre la diversité alimentaire et les indicateurs de diversité de la production au Burkina ," Post-Print ird-03127240, HAL.
    9. Muhammad Shahid & Waqar Ameer & Najma Iqbal Malik & Muhammad Babar Alam & Farooq Ahmed & Madeeha Gohar Qureshi & Huiping Zhao & Juan Yang & Sidra Zia, 2022. "Distance to Healthcare Facility and Lady Health Workers’ Visits Reduce Malnutrition in under Five Children: A Case Study of a Disadvantaged Rural District in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Grosse, Melanie & Harttgen, Kenneth & Klasen, Stephan, 2008. "Measuring Pro-Poor Growth in Non-Income Dimensions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1021-1047, June.
    11. Dorothée Boccanfuso & Jean Bosco Ki & Caroline Ménard, 2009. "Pro-Poor Growth Measurements in a Multidimensional Model: A Comparative Approach," Cahiers de recherche 09-22, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    12. Chung, Kimberly, 2012. "An Introduction to Nutrition-Agriculture Linkages," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 121859, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. World Bank, 2008. "Africa Development Indicators 2007," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 12363, December.
    14. Adjouro Togo, 2020. "Does Trade Liberalization Reduce Poverty in Mali? Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Approach," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, September.
    15. Cherrier, Cecile & Ninno, Carlo del & Razmara, Setareh, 2011. "Mali social safety nets," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 89188, The World Bank.
    16. Isaline Bergamaschi, 2011. "« Appropriation » et « lutte contre la pauvreté » au Mali. Interprétations, pratiques et discours concurrents," Revue Tiers-Monde, Armand Colin, vol. 0(1), pages 135-150.
    17. A. Lourme-Ruiz & S. Dury & Y. Martin-Prével, 2021. "Linkages between dietary diversity and indicators of agricultural biodiversity in Burkina Faso," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(2), pages 329-349, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Africa; Mali; Poverty; Cotton.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dia:wpaper:dt200909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Loic Le Pezennec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diallfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.