IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/wsrepe/10455.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A parallel computation approach for solving multistage stochastic network problems

Author

Listed:
  • Escudero, L. F.
  • Fuente, J. L. de la
  • García, C.
  • Prieto, Francisco J.

Abstract

This paper presents a parallel computation approach for the efficient solution of very large multistage linear and nonIinear network problems with random parameters. These problems resul t from particular instances of models for the robust optimization of network problems with uncertainty in the values of the right-hand side and the objective function coefficients. The methodology considered here models the uncertainty using scenarios to characterize the random parameters. A. scenario tree is generated and, through the use of full-recourse techniques, an implementable solution is obtained for each group of scenarios at each stage along the planning horizon. As a consequence of the size of the resulting problems, and the special structure of their constraints, these models are particularly well-suited for the application of decomposition techniques, and the solution of the corresponding subproblems in a parallel computation environment. An Augmented Lagrangian decomposition algorithm has been implemented on a distributed computation environment, and a static load balancing approach has been chosen for the parallelization scheme. given the subproblem structure of the model. Large problems -9000 scenarios and 14 stages with a deterministic equivalent nonlinear model having 166000 constraints and 230000 variables- are solved in 15 minutes on a cluster of 4 small (16 Mflops) workstations. An extensive set of computational experiments is reported; the numerical results and running times obtained for our test set, composed of large-scale real-life problems, confirm the efficiency of this procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Escudero, L. F. & Fuente, J. L. de la & García, C. & Prieto, Francisco J., 1996. "A parallel computation approach for solving multistage stochastic network problems," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 10455, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:10455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/10455/ws9637.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Alvarez & C. Cuevas & L. Escudero & J. Escudero & C. García & F. Prieto, 1994. "Network planning under uncertainty with an application to hydropower generation," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 2(1), pages 25-58, June.
    2. John R. Birge & Liqun Qi, 1988. "Computing Block-Angular Karmarkar Projections with Applications to Stochastic Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(12), pages 1472-1479, December.
    3. Joseph Czyzyk & Robert Fourer & Sanjay Mehrotra, 1995. "A Study of the Augmented System and Column-Splitting Approaches for Solving Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs by Interior-Point Methods," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 474-490, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Hübner & Martin Schmidt & Marc C. Steinbach, 2020. "Optimization techniques for tree-structured nonlinear problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 409-436, October.
    2. G. Y. Zhao, 1999. "Interior-Point Methods with Decomposition for Solving Large-Scale Linear Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 169-192, July.
    3. Jacek Gondzio & Andreas Grothey, 2009. "Exploiting structure in parallel implementation of interior point methods for optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 135-160, May.
    4. Arjan Berkelaar & Cees Dert & Bart Oldenkamp & Shuzhong Zhang, 2002. "A Primal-Dual Decomposition-Based Interior Point Approach to Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 904-915, October.
    5. J. Gondzio, 1994. "Preconditioned Conjugate Gradients in an Interior Point Method for Two-stage Stochastic Programming," Working Papers wp94130, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    6. Zenios, Stavros A. & Holmer, Martin R. & McKendall, Raymond & Vassiadou-Zeniou, Christiana, 1998. "Dynamic models for fixed-income portfolio management under uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(10), pages 1517-1541, August.
    7. Cosmin Petra & Mihai Anitescu, 2012. "A preconditioning technique for Schur complement systems arising in stochastic optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 315-344, June.
    8. Jacek Gondzio & Roy Kouwenberg, 2001. "High-Performance Computing for Asset-Liability Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 879-891, December.
    9. Gondzio, Jacek, 2012. "Interior point methods 25 years later," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 587-601.
    10. Meszaros, Csaba, 1997. "The augmented system variant of IPMs in two-stage stochastic linear programming computation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 317-327, September.
    11. Kuang-Yu Ding & Xin-Yee Lam & Kim-Chuan Toh, 2023. "On proximal augmented Lagrangian based decomposition methods for dual block-angular convex composite programming problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 117-161, September.
    12. Sanjay Mehrotra & M. Gokhan Ozevin, 2009. "Decomposition Based Interior Point Methods for Two-Stage Stochastic Convex Quadratic Programs with Recourse," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 964-974, August.
    13. Diana Barro & Elio Canestrelli, 2005. "Time and nodal decomposition with implicit non-anticipativity constraints in dynamic portfolio optimization," GE, Growth, Math methods 0510011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Escudero, L. F. & Galindo, E. & Garcia, G. & Gomez, E. & Sabau, V., 1999. "Schumann, a modeling framework for supply chain management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 14-34, November.
    15. Jacek Gondzio & Andreas Grothey, 2007. "Parallel interior-point solver for structured quadratic programs: Application to financial planning problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 319-339, July.
    16. Emmanuel Fragnière & Jacek Gondzio & Robert Sarkissian & Jean-Philippe Vial, 2000. "A Structure-Exploiting Tool in Algebraic Modeling Languages," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(8), pages 1145-1158, August.
    17. Berkelaar, A.B. & Dert, C.L. & Oldenkamp, K.P.B. & Zhang, S., 1999. "A primal-dual decomposition based interior point approach to two-stage stochastic linear programming," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9918-/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    18. Tiago Andrade & Nikita Belyak & Andrew Eberhard & Silvio Hamacher & Fabricio Oliveira, 2022. "The p-Lagrangian relaxation for separable nonconvex MIQCQP problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 43-76, September.
    19. A. Ruszczynski, 1993. "Interior Point Methods in Stochastic Programming," Working Papers wp93008, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    20. Kouwenberg, Roy, 2001. "Scenario generation and stochastic programming models for asset liability management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 279-292, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Large-scale optimization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:10455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_estadistica .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.