IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cnn/wpaper/23-003e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proposals for the G7 Hiroshima Summit based on Future Design ~International Governance for Global Public Goods~

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshinori Nakagawa
  • Keiichiro Kobayashi
  • Ken Jimbo
  • Kazuhito Yamashita
  • Akiko Yoshioka, Tatsuyoshi Saijo

Abstract

Humanity is facing various challenges today, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the resulting energy and food security crises, the collapse of the global biogeochemical cycle systems including carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and the biodiversity collapse. Faced with such urgent challenges to survival, it is only natural that we would attempt to solve them with immediate and effective responses. However, future generations who will live decades from now may not necessarily regard these solutions as the best choices. Such concerns become real when discussions about the future are stifled by short-term interests of individual nations, preventing consensus-building and the development of creative visions for the long-term future. Therefore, various methods have been developed to design a long-term future to ensure the protection of the interests of future generations, who do not have a voice to negotiate with the current generation. One of these methods, Future Design (FD)—which systematizes the way policy makers imagine policies from the perspective of the future—has been gaining attention in recent years. We (authors 2–5) conducted discussions to simulate the adoption of the FD approach during the G7 Hiroshima Summit in 2023 when the participating leaders will respond to the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. To this end, we developed a concrete image of what the international community will look like in 2053, and then envisioned a path for the international community to realize cooperation among various seemingly unrelated issues that will become linked within a span of 30 years. Based on this experience, we have the following proposals for the Heads of State and Government participating in the 2023 G7 Hiroshima Summit. In particular, we would like to emphasize that Heads of State or Government should strive to establish an international governance system to provide global public goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshinori Nakagawa & Keiichiro Kobayashi & Ken Jimbo & Kazuhito Yamashita & Akiko Yoshioka, Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2023. "Proposals for the G7 Hiroshima Summit based on Future Design ~International Governance for Global Public Goods~," CIGS Working Paper Series 23-003E, The Canon Institute for Global Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:23-003e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cigs.canon/en/uploads/2023/03/Proposals_for_the_G7_Hiroshima_Summit_based_on_Future_Design_202303.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaul, Inge & Conceicao, Pedro & Le Goulven, Katell & Mendoza, Ronald U. (ed.), 2003. "Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195157413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toleubayev, Kazbek & Jansen, Kees & van Huis, Arnold, 2010. "Commodification of science and the production of public goods: Plant protection research in Kazakhstan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 411-421, April.
    2. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Wolfgang Buchholz & Wolfgang Peters, 2008. "Equal sacrifice and fair burden-sharing in a public goods economy," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 15(4), pages 415-429, August.
    4. Hicks, Robert L. & Parks, Bradley C. & Tierney, Michael J., 2005. "Explaining the Allocation of Bilateral and Multilateral Environmental Aid to Developing Countries," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19346, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Todd Sandler, 2023. "COVID-19 Activities: Publicness and Strategic Concerns," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, 2010. "Problem perception and public expectations in international institutions: Evidence from a German representative survey," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2010-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Travis Wiseman & Andrew Young, 2015. "Is foreign aid a pure public good for donor country citizens?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 421-433, December.
    8. Reisen, Helmut, 2010. "The multilateral donor non-system: towards accountability and efficient role assignment," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 4, pages 1-22.
    9. Tony Addison, 2005. "Post-Conflict Recovery: Does the Global Economy Work for Peace?," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2005-05, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Tanzi, Vito, 2021. "Economic Theory Versus Economic Reality: Dealing with Pandemics and Other Global Public Goods and Bads," Working Papers 21/360, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    11. Alois Humer & Daniel Rauhut & Nuno Costa, 2012. "European Types of Politico-territorial Organization and Public-private Finance of Social Services of General Interest," ERSA conference papers ersa12p526, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Raechelle Mascarenhas & Todd Sandler, 2006. "Do donors cooperatively fund foreign aid?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 337-357, December.
    13. Cagatay, Nilüfer. & Ertürk, Korkuk., 2004. "Gender and globalization : a macroeconomic perspective," ILO Working Papers 993709743402676, International Labour Organization.
    14. Faruk ÜLGEN, 2018. "Financial stability as a global public good and relevant systemic regulation as a problem of collective action," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 95-112, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    15. Mumbunan, Sonny & Ring, Irene & Lenk, Thomas, 2012. "Ecological fiscal transfers at the provincial level in Indonesia," UFZ Discussion Papers 06/2012, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    16. Hielscher Stefan, 2008. "Die Sachs-Easterly-Kontroverse: „Dissent on Development” Revisited – Eine ordonomische Analyse zur Interdependenz von Sozialstruktur und Semantik moderner Entwicklungspolitik / The Sachs-Easterly-Cont," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 59(1), pages 441-474, January.
    17. Tosun, Mehmet S., 2011. "Demographic Divide and Labor Migration in the Euro-Mediterranean Region," IZA Discussion Papers 6188, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Catherine DARROT & Diane GIORGIS & Jean-Paul BILLAUD & Philippe BOUDES, 2015. "Comment favoriser la fourniture de biens publics d’origine agricole en Europe ? Les gens ne viennent pas voir la qualité de l’eau dans un ruisseau, ils viennent voir un paysage," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(4), pages 625-652.
    19. Tony Addison & George Mavrotas & Mark McGillivray, 2005. "Development assistance and development finance: evidence and global policy agendas," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 819-836.
    20. Mizan R. Khan & Sirazoom Munira, 2021. "Climate change adaptation as a global public good: implications for financing," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:23-003e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Canon Institute for Global Studies (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/canonjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.