IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2021s-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Classes and Taxes: Socio-Economic Status, Ideology and (Un)Willingness to Pay

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Jacques

Abstract

While public opinion research has identified the drivers of preferences for tax progressivity, public spending and support for redistribution, the study of willingness to pay taxes remains underdeveloped. This paper uses the 2016 ISSP cross national survey on the Role of Government and the Risks that Matter survey (OECD 2018) to identify which groups of voters are more likely to be willing to pay higher taxes. It shows that ideology and income interact to predict willingness to pay. Among left-wing respondents, socio-economic status, measured by income and education, has a positive effect on willingness to pay additional taxes. Thus, the core constituencies of left-wing parties composed of socio-cultural professionals and of production and service workers have different tax policy preferences. Socio-cultural professionals have a higher socio-economic status and are significantly more willing to pay taxes than production and service workers, who share a lower socio-economic status. Si les recherches sur l'opinion publique ont permis d'identifier les moteurs des préférences en matière de progressivité de l'impôt, de dépenses publiques et de soutien à la redistribution, l'étude de la volonté de payer des impôts reste peu développée. Cet article utilise l'enquête transnationale 2016 de l'ISSP sur le rôle du gouvernement et les risques qui comptent (OCDE 2018) pour identifier les groupes d'électeurs les plus susceptibles d'être disposés à payer des impôts plus élevés. Elle montre que l'idéologie et le revenu interagissent pour prédire la volonté de payer. Parmi les répondants de gauche, le statut socio-économique, mesuré par le revenu et l'éducation, a un effet positif sur la volonté de payer des impôts supplémentaires. Ainsi, les principaux électeurs des partis de gauche, composés de professionnels socioculturels et de travailleurs de la production et des services, ont des préférences différentes en matière de politique fiscale. Les professionnels socioculturels ont un statut socio-économique plus élevé et sont significativement plus disposés à payer des impôts que les travailleurs de la production et des services, qui ont un statut socio-économique plus faible.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Jacques, 2021. "Classes and Taxes: Socio-Economic Status, Ideology and (Un)Willingness to Pay," CIRANO Working Papers 2021s-37, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2021s-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2021s-37.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingying Deng & Monica Prasad, 2009. "Taxation and the Worlds of Welfare," LIS Working papers 480, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    2. Beramendi, Pablo & Rueda, David, 2007. "Social Democracy Constrained: Indirect Taxation in Industrialized Democracies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 619-641, October.
    3. Mounir Karadja & Johanna Mollerstrom & David Seim, 2017. "Richer (and Holier) Than Thou? The Effect of Relative Income Improvements on Demand for Redistribution," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(2), pages 201-212, May.
    4. Daniel Stegmueller, 2013. "How Many Countries for Multilevel Modeling? A Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 748-761, July.
    5. Hainmueller, Jens & Mummolo, Jonathan & Xu, Yiqing, 2019. "How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 163-192, April.
    6. Karceski, Steven M. & Kiser, Edgar, 2020. "Is there a limit to the size of the state? The scope conditions of Wagner's law," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 217-232, April.
    7. Takanori Sumino, 2016. "Level or Concentration? A Cross-national Analysis of Public Attitudes Towards Taxation Policies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1115-1134, December.
    8. Eriksen, Knut & Fallan, Lars, 1996. "Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation; A report on a quasi-experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 387-402, June.
    9. Meltzer, Allan H & Richard, Scott F, 1981. "A Rational Theory of the Size of Government," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(5), pages 914-927, October.
    10. Oesch, Daniel, 2013. "Occupational Change in Europe: How Technology and Education Transform the Job Structure," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199680962.
    11. Peter Lindert, 2004. "Social Spending and Economic Growth," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 6-16.
    12. Nazim Habibov & Alena Auchynnikava & Rong Luo & Lida Fan, 2018. "Who wants to pay more taxes to improve public health care?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 944-959, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malte Luebker, 2019. "Can the Structure of Inequality Explain Fiscal Redistribution? Revisiting the Social Affinity Hypothesis," LIS Working papers 762, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    2. Elvire Guillaud & Matthew Olckers & Michaël Zemmour, 2020. "Four Levers of Redistribution: The Impact of Tax and Transfer Systems on Inequality Reduction," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(2), pages 444-466, June.
    3. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/cnic3v8rndpflfg9o652730go is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nicolas Delalande, 2012. "L’économie politique des réformes fiscales: Une analyse historique," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/cnic3v8rndp, Sciences Po.
    5. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/cnic3v8rndpflfg9o652730go is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/cnic3v8rndpflfg9o652730go is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Hope, David & Limberg, Julian & Weber, Nina, 2023. "Why do (some) ordinary Americans support tax cuts for the rich? Evidence from a randomised survey experiment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Nicolas Delalande, 2012. "L'économie politique des réformes fiscales: Une analyse historique," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01024598, HAL.
    9. Limberg, Julian, 2022. "Building a tax state in the 21st century: Fiscal pressure, political regimes, and consumption taxation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Choi, Gwangeun, 2019. "Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 220-244.
    11. Roberto Iacono & Marco Ranaldi, 2021. "The nexus between perceptions of inequality and preferences for redistribution," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(1), pages 97-114, March.
    12. Nicolas Delalande, 2012. "L'économie politique des réformes fiscales: Une analyse historique," Post-Print hal-01024598, HAL.
    13. Olivier Jacques & David Weisstanner, 2022. "The Micro-Foundations of Permanent Austerity: Income Stagnation and the Decline of Taxability in Advanced Democracies," LIS Working papers 839, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    14. Torregrosa Hetland, Sara & Sabaté, Oriol, 2021. "Income Taxes and Redistribution in the Early Twentieth Century," Lund Papers in Economic History 224, Lund University, Department of Economic History, revised 05 Sep 2022.
    15. Nora Lustig, 2017. "Fiscal Policy, Income Redistribution and Poverty Reduction in Low and Middle Income Countries," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 54, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    16. Keefer, Philip & Scartascini, Carlos & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2022. "Demand-side determinants of public spending allocations: Voter trust, risk and time preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Michael Zemmour, 2015. "Economie politique du financement progressif de la protection sociale," Sciences Po publications 38, Sciences Po.
    18. Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M. & Krozer, Alice & Ramírez-Álvarez, Aurora A. & de la Torre, Rodolfo & Velez-Grajales, Roberto, 2022. "Perceptions of inequality and social mobility in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Solikin, Akhmad & Nizar, Muhammad Afdi, 2022. "Government Revenue and Government Spending Nexus: A Testing Hypothesis for Indonesia," MPRA Paper 118556, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Bautista, M. A. & González, F. & Martínez, L. R. & Muñoz, P. & Prem, M., 2020. "Chile’s Missing Students: Dictatorship, Higher Education and Social Mobility," Documentos de Trabajo 18163, Universidad del Rosario.
    21. Fabio Sabatini & Marco Ventura & Eiji Yamamura & Luca Zamparelli, 2020. "Fairness and the Unselfish Demand for Redistribution by Taxpayers and Welfare Recipients," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(3), pages 971-988, January.
    22. Momi Dahan, 2023. "Social Construction And The Progressivity Of Local Tax Relief," Israel Economic Review, Bank of Israel, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, March.
    23. Valentino Larcinese, 2007. "Voting over Redistribution and the Size of the Welfare State: The Role of Turnout," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(3), pages 568-585, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    taxation; occupations; ideology; education; Europe; income; fiscalité; professions; idéologie; revenu; éducation; Europe;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2021s-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.