This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Is it Good to Talk? Information Disclosure and Organisational Performance in the UKIncorporating evidence submitted on the DTI discussion paper High Performance Workplaces - Informing and Consulting Employees

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Helen Bewley
Howard Gospel
R Peccei
P Willman

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The disclosure of information by management to employees varies significantly between workplaces. Theeffects of this variance on organizational performance are analysed using WERS98 data. The results show thatthe impact of information disclosure on organisational performance is more complex than is often assumed inthe literature. Overall, there is a significant impact, both direct and indirect, and this varies depending on thelevel of employee organisational commitment, the type of information disclosed, and the performance outcomeinvolved. On the whole, the positive effects are less in union settings and in situations where unions are strong.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0602.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers with number dp0602.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Dec 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0602

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Kochan, Thomas A., 1996. "What works at work : overview and assessment," Working papers 3886-96., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management. [Downloadable!]
  2. Williamson, Oliver E, 1983. "Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 519-40, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Harvie Ramsay & Dora Scholarios & Bill Harley, 2000. "Employees and High-Performance Work Systems: Testing inside the Black Box," British Journal of Industrial Relations, Blackwell Publishers Ltd/London School of Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 501-531, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Motohiro Morishima, 1991. "Information sharing and collective bargaining in Japan: Effects on wage negotiation," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, ILR Review, ILR School, Cornell University, vol. 44(3), pages 469-485, April.
  5. Morris M. Kleiner & Marvin L. Bouillon, 1988. "Providing business information to production workers: Correlates of compensation and profitability," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, ILR Review, ILR School, Cornell University, vol. 41(4), pages 605-617, July.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Cannot find something on IDEAS? Encourage the publisher to index it! Instructions.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.