IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt9zz8n5x5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Across Early Policy and Market Contexts Women and Men Show Similar Interest in Electric Vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Kurani, Kenneth
  • Buch, Koral

Abstract

While ownership and purchase of all vehicles approach gender parity, to date electric vehicles (EV) are being purchased by far more men than women. Prior analysis from California finds no reason in the available data why this difference persists. This report extends that analysis across 12 other U.S. states with varying, but generally less supportive than California, EV policy and market contexts. Data are from a survey conducted of new-car buying households at the end of 2014, which allowed participants to express their prospective interest in acquiring an EV. Participants then indicated why they were motivated to select an EV or what motivated them to not select one. Via multivariate modeling, differences in prospective interest in EVs between female and male respondents are examined, and overall, no difference rises to the level of the observed differences in real EV markets. Further, the multivariate modeling indicates no statistically significant effect of a sex indicator on prospective interest almost anywhere in these data; where there is a difference, female participants are estimated to be more likely to select an EV than their male counterparts. While participants from both sexes tend to give high scores to the same EV (de)motivations, differences in their rank orders repeat generalizations from other research. On average, female respondents score environmental motivations for selecting an EV higher than do male respondents. On average, male participants score interest in “new technology” as a motivation for selecting an EV higher than do female participants. Conversely, on average female respondents who do not select an EV score “unfamiliar technology” more highly than their male counterparts. Within the variation in EV policy and market contexts represented in this study, no finding here explains why similar prospective interest in EVs from five years ago has yet to be turned toward equal participation in EV markets. Explanations may lie in factors not modeled here. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Kurani, Kenneth & Buch, Koral, 2021. "Across Early Policy and Market Contexts Women and Men Show Similar Interest in Electric Vehicles," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9zz8n5x5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9zz8n5x5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9zz8n5x5.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caperello, Nicolette & TyreeHageman, Jennifer & Kurani, Kenneth, 2014. "Engendering the Future of Electric Vehicles: Conversations with Men and Women," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4fv7x1qv, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo, 2019. "Who will buy electric vehicles after early adopters? Using machine learning to identify the electric vehicle mainstream market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 243-254.
    3. Kurani, Kenneth S. & Caperello, Nicolette & TyreeHageman, Jennifer, 2016. "New Car Buyers' Valuation of Zero-Emission Vehicles: California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt28v320rq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brett D. H. Williams & John B. Anderson, 2021. "Strategically Targeting Plug-In Electric Vehicle Rebates and Outreach Using “EV Convert” Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna & Michalski, Rafał & Kott, Marek & Skowrońska-Szmer, Anna & Kott, Joanna, 2022. "Consumer preferences towards alternative fuel vehicles. Results from the conjoint analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Felix Hinnüber & Marek Szarucki & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska, 2019. "The Effects of a First-Time Experience on the Evaluation of Battery Electric Vehicles by Potential Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Kester, Johannes & Noel, Lance & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo, 2020. "Actors, business models, and innovation activity systems for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Ruyu Xie & Liren An & Nosheena Yasir, 2022. "How Innovative Characteristics Influence Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Electric Vehicle: A Moderating Role of Lifestyle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Alabi, Oluwafisayo & Turner, Karen & Figus, Gioele & Katris, Antonios & Calvillo, Christian, 2020. "Can spending to upgrade electricity networks to support electric vehicles (EVs) roll-outs unlock value in the wider economy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Secinaro, Silvana & Calandra, Davide & Lanzalonga, Federico & Ferraris, Alberto, 2022. "Electric vehicles’ consumer behaviours: Mapping the field and providing a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 399-416.
    8. Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna & Kott, Joanna & Kott, Marek, 2020. "Why Polish market of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) is the smallest in Europe? SWOT analysis of opportunities and threats," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Caulfield, Brian & Furszyfer, Dylan & Stefaniec, Agnieszka & Foley, Aoife, 2022. "Measuring the equity impacts of government subsidies for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Yuan, Xiaodong & Cai, Yuchen, 2021. "Forecasting the development trend of low emission vehicle technologies: Based on patent data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Fan, Jing-Li & Wang, Jia-Xing & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "An innovative subsidy model for promoting the sharing of Electric Vehicles in China: A pricing decisions analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    12. Munten, Pauline & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Maon, François & Swaen, Valérie & Lindgreen, Adam, 2021. "Addressing tensions in coopetition for sustainable innovation: Insights from the automotive industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 10-20.
    13. Zimm, Caroline, 2021. "Improving the understanding of electric vehicle technology and policy diffusion across countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 54-66.
    14. Chorowski, Michał & Nowak, Andrzej & Andersen, Jørgen Vitting, 2023. "What makes products trendy: Introducing an innovation adoption model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 616(C).
    15. Bas, Javier & Cirillo, Cinzia & Cherchi, Elisabetta, 2021. "Classification of potential electric vehicle purchasers: A machine learning approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Sanguinetti, Angela & Favetti, Matthew & Hirschfelt, Kate & Kong, Nathaniel & Chakraborty, Debapriya & Alston-Stepnitz, Eli & Ma, Howard, 2023. "Developing a Vehicle Cost Calculator to Promote Electric Vehicle Adoption Among TNC Drivers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1v44b5kp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Manik Chandra Das & Abanish Pandey & Arun Kumar Mahato & Rajnish Kumar Singh, 2019. "Comparative performance of electric vehicles using evaluation of mixed data," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 1067-1090, September.
    18. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Axsen, Jonn, 2018. "Functional, symbolic and societal frames for automobility: Implications for sustainability transitions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 730-746.
    19. Gan, Zhongying, 2023. "Do electric vehicle charger locations respond to the potential charging demands from multi-unit dwellings? Evidence from Los Angeles County," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 74-93.
    20. Hyeon-Woo Kim & Angani Amarnathvarma & Eugene Kim & Myeong-Hwan Hwang & Kyoungmin Kim & Hyunwoo Kim & Iksu Choi & Hyun-Rok Cha, 2022. "A Novel Torque Matching Strategy for Dual Motor-Based All-Wheel-Driving Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences; Automobile ownership; Consumer preferences; Electric vehicles; Gender; Surveys;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9zz8n5x5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.