In their celebrated contribution on credit rationing, Stiglitz and Weiss (1981) showed that the expected return to the borrower on a loan is increasing in the risk of the project it funds. In this paper, I show that their results do not necessarily carry over to the case where the agents' preferences can be described by rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU). In particular, a pessimistic probability distortion function for borrowers can yield sufficient concavity in returns for the latter to be decreasing in risk, thus eliminating adverse selection. Whether credit rationing can obtain or not is then shown to depend upon the interaction between borrower pessimism and lender optimism.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by CERDI in its series Working Papers with number
200620.
Length: 7 Date of creation: 2006 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:cdi:wpaper:840
Contact details of provider: Postal: 65 Bd. F. Mitterrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand Phone: (33-4) 73 17 74 00 Fax: (33-4) 73 17 74 28 Web page: http://cerdi.org/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Vincent Mazenod).