IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/en7499.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Quality of Growth: Accounting for Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Michel AGLIETTA

Abstract

This paper has three purposes. First, it follows the UN conceptual and measurement approach in providing a welfare theoretic framework for sustainability. The intergenerational conditions for sustainable development involve shadow prices that are social marginal contributions to social welfare, allowing a determination of inclusive wealth and comparison of countries according to variations over time. Second, the inclusive wealth model can guide sustainable development policies provided that shadow prices can be estimated. Shadow prices are not revealed by markets because of the many externalities that impinge upon inclusive wealth, not least the interactions between ecological and economic processes. To improve inclusive wealth, the structure of capital that comprises it must be transformed through investments that capture the relevant externalities. Since investment projects are made by decentralized firms, they need the right incentives. These will depend on the prospective structure of shadow prices along the expected future path of the economy. The measurement tools to promote inclusive wealthfriendly investments involve an overhaul of both national and business accounting as well as a deep change in corporate governance from shareholder value to include both inside and outside stakeholder participation. Third, the main externality threatening sustainable development is climate change, an externality that is not substitutable to existing real assets that are part of social wealth. Climate change should be handled urgently via policies dedicated to both GHG reduction and adaptation. Clean investments concern all sectors of production; therefore incentives depend on carbon pricing and require a massive reorientation of financing. The paper shows that an international agreement among countries on a notional price of carbon, applicable to new investments and differentiated according to the development needs of countries, can provide the right incentives. This should be complemented by a new financial intermediation with monetary backup to overcome the inability of financial markets to provide the huge amounts of credit needed to reorient the production system.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel AGLIETTA, 2017. "The Quality of Growth: Accounting for Sustainability," Working Paper aafded88-bac8-4bb9-bf07-4, Agence française de développement.
    • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en7499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2017-09/01-papiers-recherche-Quality-of-Growth_Aglietta.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul Anand & Saurabh Mishra & Shanaka J. Peiris, 2013. "Inclusive Growth Revisited," World Bank Publications - Reports 22618, The World Bank Group.
    2. Stern,Nicholas, 2007. "The Economics of Climate Change," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521700801.
    3. Michel Aglietta & Jean-Charles Hourcade & Carlo Jaeger & Baptiste Fabert, 2015. "Financing transition in an adverse context: climate finance beyond carbon finance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 403-420, November.
    4. Henry Hansmann & Reinier Kraakman, 2000. "The End Of History For Corporate Law," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm136, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Feb 2001.
    5. William D. Nordhaus, 2007. "A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(3), pages 686-702, September.
    6. Roger Guesnerie & Nicholas Stern, 2012. "Deux économistes face aux enjeux climatiques," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-00812985, HAL.
    7. Dumas, P. & Hourcade, J. C. & Fabert, B. Perrissin, 2010. "Do we need a zero pure time preference or the risk of climate catastrophes to justify a 2C global warming target ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5392, The World Bank.
    8. M. Aglietta & J. C. Hourcade & C. Jaeger & B. P. Fabert, 2015. "Financing transition in an adverse context: climate finance beyond carbon finance," Post-Print hal-01239776, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stéphane Hallegatte, 2008. "A Proposal for a New Prescriptive Discounting Scheme: The Intergenerational Discount Rate," Working Papers 2008.47, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    3. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo, 2014. "The social rate of discount, climate change and real options," CEIS Research Paper 309, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 18 Feb 2014.
    4. Simon Dietz & Frederick van der Ploeg & Armon Rezai & Frank Venmans, 2021. "Are Economists Getting Climate Dynamics Right and Does It Matter?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(5), pages 895-921.
    5. Li, Jun & Colombier, Michel & Giraud, Pierre-Noël, 2009. "Decision on optimal building energy efficiency standard in China--The case for Tianjin," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2546-2559, July.
    6. Pycroft, Jonathan & Vergano, Lucia & Hope, Chris & Paci, Daniele & Ciscar, Juan Carlos, 2011. "A tale of tails: Uncertainty and the social cost of carbon dioxide," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 5, pages 1-29.
    7. Min Gong & David Krantz & Elke Weber, 2014. "Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 103-124, October.
    8. Söderholm, Patrik & Pettersson, Fredrik, 2008. "Climate policy and the social cost of power generation: Impacts of the Swedish national emissions target," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4154-4158, November.
    9. Garth Heutel, 2012. "How Should Environmental Policy Respond to Business Cycles? Optimal Policy under Persistent Productivity Shocks," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 15(2), pages 244-264, April.
    10. Richard Tol, 2011. "Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 827-839, October.
    11. Melissa Dell & Benjamin F. Jones & Benjamin A. Olken, 2014. "What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy Literature," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(3), pages 740-798, September.
    12. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2013_024 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Oikawa, Koki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2015. "R&D in clean technology: A project choice model with learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 175-195.
    14. Therese Grijalva & Jayson Lusk & W. Shaw, 2014. "Discounting the Distant Future: An Experimental Investigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(1), pages 39-63, September.
    15. Tol, Richard S.J. & Yohe, Gary W., 2009. "The Stern Review: A deconstruction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1032-1040, March.
    16. Olivier Guéant & Roger Guesnerie & Jean‐Michel Lasry, 2012. "Ecological Intuition versus Economic “Reason”," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 14(2), pages 245-272, March.
    17. Matteo Escud'e & Ludvig Sinander, 2019. "Slow persuasion," Papers 1903.09055, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    18. Deegen, Peter & Matolepszy, Kai, 2015. "Economic balancing of forest management under storm risk, the case of the Ore Mountains (Germany)," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13.
    19. Philippe Aghion & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & David Hémous & Ralf Martin & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 1-51.
    20. Gollier, Christian, 2021. "The Welfare Cost of Ignoring the Beta," FEEM Working Papers 309916, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    21. Kögel, Tomas, 2009. "On the Relation between Dual-Rate Discounting and Substitutability," Economics Discussion Papers 2009-10, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en7499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.