IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1804.09253.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

DeepTriangle: A Deep Learning Approach to Loss Reserving

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Kuo

Abstract

We propose a novel approach for loss reserving based on deep neural networks. The approach allows for joint modeling of paid losses and claims outstanding, and incorporation of heterogeneous inputs. We validate the models on loss reserving data across lines of business, and show that they improve on the predictive accuracy of existing stochastic methods. The models require minimal feature engineering and expert input, and can be automated to produce forecasts more frequently than manual workflows.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Kuo, 2018. "DeepTriangle: A Deep Learning Approach to Loss Reserving," Papers 1804.09253, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1804.09253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.09253
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J., 2002. "Stochastic Claims Reserving in General Insurance," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 443-518, August.
    2. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Vu, Phuong Anh & Wong, Bernard, 2016. "Stochastic loss reserving with dependence: A flexible multivariate Tweedie approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Doyle & Chris Groendyke, 2018. "Using Neural Networks to Price and Hedge Variable Annuity Guarantees," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Łukasz Delong & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2020. "Neural Networks for the Joint Development of Individual Payments and Claim Incurred," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-34, April.
    3. Simon CK Lee, 2020. "Delta Boosting Implementation of Negative Binomial Regression in Actuarial Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Stephan M. Bischofberger, 2020. "In-Sample Hazard Forecasting Based on Survival Models with Operational Time," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Benjamin Avanzi & Yanfeng Li & Bernard Wong & Alan Xian, 2022. "Ensemble distributional forecasting for insurance loss reserving," Papers 2206.08541, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    6. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wang, Melantha & Wong, Bernard, 2021. "SynthETIC: An individual insurance claim simulator with feature control," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 296-308.
    7. Muhammed Taher Al-Mudafer & Benjamin Avanzi & Greg Taylor & Bernard Wong, 2021. "Stochastic loss reserving with mixture density neural networks," Papers 2108.07924, arXiv.org.
    8. Catalina Lozano-Murcia & Francisco P. Romero & Jesus Serrano-Guerrero & Arturo Peralta & Jose A. Olivas, 2024. "Potential Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Actuarial Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Kevin Kuo & Daniel Lupton, 2020. "Towards Explainability of Machine Learning Models in Insurance Pricing," Papers 2003.10674, arXiv.org.
    10. Valandis Elpidorou & Carolin Margraf & María Dolores Martínez-Miranda & Bent Nielsen, 2019. "A Likelihood Approach to Bornhuetter–Ferguson Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Greg Taylor, 2019. "Risks Special Issue on “Granular Models and Machine Learning Models”," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-2, December.
    12. Xu, Shuzhe & Zhang, Chuanlong & Hong, Don, 2022. "BERT-based NLP techniques for classification and severity modeling in basic warranty data study," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 57-67.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Vu, Phuong Anh & Wong, Bernard, 2020. "A multivariate evolutionary generalised linear model framework with adaptive estimation for claims reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 50-71.
    2. Gian Paolo Clemente & Nino Savelli & Diego Zappa, 2019. "Modelling Outstanding Claims with Mixed Compound Processes in Insurance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 123-138, March.
    3. Kevin Kuo, 2019. "DeepTriangle: A Deep Learning Approach to Loss Reserving," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Benjamin Avanzi & Gregory Clive Taylor & Phuong Anh Vu & Bernard Wong, 2020. "A multivariate evolutionary generalised linear model framework with adaptive estimation for claims reserving," Papers 2004.06880, arXiv.org.
    5. de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge, 2007. "Claim reserving with fuzzy regression and Taylor's geometric separation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 145-163, January.
    6. Lars Hougaard Hansen & Bent Nielsen & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2004. "Two sided analysis of variance with a latent time series," Economics Papers 2004-W25, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    7. COSTA, JUAN IGNACIO BACCINO & DE ARMAS, GONZALO & Álvarez-Vaz, Ramón Dr., 2022. "Estudio De Algunos Métodos De Reservas Técnicas En Condiciones De Incertidumbre Para Seguros De No Vida (Study Of Some Methods Of Technical Reserves Under Conditions Of Uncertainty For Non-Life Insura," OSF Preprints 3pjr9, Center for Open Science.
    8. Emmanuel Jordy Menvouta & Jolien Ponnet & Robin Van Oirbeek & Tim Verdonck, 2022. "mCube: Multinomial Micro-level reserving Model," Papers 2212.00101, arXiv.org.
    9. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    10. Corneliu Cristian Bente, 2017. "Actuarial Estimation Of Technical Reserves In Insurance Companies. Basic Chain Ladder Method," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 227-234, July.
    11. Francis Duval & Mathieu Pigeon, 2019. "Individual Loss Reserving Using a Gradient Boosting-Based Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, July.
    12. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen & J. P. Nielsen, 2008. "Identification of the age-period-cohort model and the extended chain-ladder model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(4), pages 979-986.
    13. Pitselis, Georgios & Grigoriadou, Vasiliki & Badounas, Ioannis, 2015. "Robust loss reserving in a log-linear model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 14-27.
    14. Ihsan Chaoubi & Camille Besse & H'el`ene Cossette & Marie-Pier C^ot'e, 2022. "Micro-level Reserving for General Insurance Claims using a Long Short-Term Memory Network," Papers 2201.13267, arXiv.org.
    15. Bent Nielsen, 2014. "Deviance analysis of age-period-cohort models," Economics Papers 2014-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    16. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Generalized Log-Normal Chain-Ladder," Papers 1806.05939, arXiv.org.
    17. M. Hiabu & E. Mammen & M. D. Martìnez-Miranda & J. P. Nielsen, 2016. "In-sample forecasting with local linear survival densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 843-859.
    18. Kris Peremans & Stefan Van Aelst & Tim Verdonck, 2018. "A Robust General Multivariate Chain Ladder Method," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Bischofberger, Stephan M. & Hiabu, Munir & Mammen, Enno & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2019. "A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 133-154.
    20. Furman, Edward & Kuznetsov, Alexey & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2018. "Weighted risk capital allocations in the presence of systematic risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 75-81.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1804.09253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.