IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/13906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural Policy Developments In The United States: 1991-93

Author

Listed:
  • Runge, C. Ford
  • Vande Kamp, Philip R.

Abstract

Comprehensive federal agricultural legislation occurs in the United States (US) on a five-year schedule. While year-to-year changes in agricultural policy do occur, the period 1991-93 has been less eventful than many previous ones. What changes have occurred to affect the course of the agricultural sector and agricultural policy are largely external to the farm bill and farm legislation. These include the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), tentatively agreed in August 1992; the on-going negotiations in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the related dispute with the European Community (EC) over oilseed subsidies; the emergence in connection with both NAFTA and GATT of the "trade and environment" issue; a continuing dispute over wetlands and the proper level of compensation if they are restricted by government action; and, of course. the presidential election of 1992 and the probable changes in course under a new Clinton administration. A brief summary of federal legislative actions impinging on agriculture begins this review article; however, the general analysis and tabular summary provided in our 1990 review (Erdman and Runge 1990) will still suffice as a guide to extant farm policy under the 1990 farm bill. The probable impacts of NAFTA are considered in the second section. The state of play in the GATT negotiations and the related oilseeds dispute with the EC are discussed in the third. while in the fourth, the "trade and environment" issue is discussed. Domestic US environmental issues, focusing on wetlands. are covered in the fifth, and in the final section an outlook on the course of the Clinton administration in the years leading to the 1995 farm bill is offered.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Runge, C. Ford & Vande Kamp, Philip R., 1993. "Agricultural Policy Developments In The United States: 1991-93," Staff Papers 13906, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13906
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/13906/files/p93-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.13906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erdman, Laurie & Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "American Agricultural Policy and the 1990 Farm Bill," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(02-03), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Carlisle Ford Runge & Harald von Witzke, 1987. "Institutional Change in the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 213-222.
    3. Runge, C. Ford, 1992. "Environmental Effects Of Trade In The Agricultural Sector: A Case Study," Working Papers 14449, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathy Sane & Miroslav Hajek & Chukwudi Nwaogu & Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri, 2021. "Subsidy as An Economic Instrument for Environmental Protection: A Case of Global Fertilizer Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Liu, Zong-Shin, 1989. "Monetary policy, exchange rate, and effects on US wheat trade and domestic market in an imperfect competition framework," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010216, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Courtney Harold & C. Ford Runge, 1993. "GATT and the Environment: Policy Research Needs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(3), pages 789-793.
    4. Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "International Public Goods, Export Subsidies, and the Harmonization of Environmental Regulations," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50876, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann, 2015. "Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15889.
    6. De Gorter, Harry & Swinnen, Jo, 1995. "The Political Economy and Institutional Determinants of Public Policy in Agriculture," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183390, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. J. Pokrivcak & H. de Goiter & J. F. M. Swinnen, 2001. "Does a “Restaurant Table Effect” Exist with the EU's Common Agricultural Policy? A Note," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 111-113, September.
    8. Colyer, Dale, 2002. "Environmental Issues In The Ftaa," Conference Papers 19107, West Virginia University, Department of Agricultural Resource Economics.
    9. Runge, C. Ford, 1999. "Stream, River, Delta: Induced Innovation And Environmental Values In Economics And Policy," Working Papers 14465, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    10. Maya, Peter H. & Bonilla, Olman Segura, 1997. "The environmental effects of agricultural trade liberalization in Latin America: an interpretation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 5-18, July.
    11. Runge, C. Ford & von Witzke, Harald & Thompson, Shelley, 1987. "Liberal Agricultural Trade As A Public Good: Free Trade Versus Free Riding Under Gatt," Staff Papers 13635, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Jogeneel, Roel & Cronin, Evelien & Polman, Nico, 2018. "EU CAP 2014-2020 policy implementation choices: Is there a Member State typology?," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271967, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Yinhao Wu & Enru Wang & Changhong Miao, 2019. "Fertilizer Use in China: The Role of Agricultural Support Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Vande Kamp, Philip R. & Runge, C. Ford, 1994. "Trends and Developments in United States Agricultural Policy: 1993-1995," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(03), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Livingston, Marie L. & Witzke, Harald von, 1989. "Transboundary Environmental Degradation and the Growing Demand for Institutional Innovation," 1989 Occasional Paper Series No. 5 197687, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Franchino, Fabio, 1998. "Institutionalism and Commissions Executive Discretion: an Empirical Analysis," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 2, July.
    17. Hillman, Jimmye S., 1994. "The Uruguay Round: From Cold War To Cooperation In Negotiating Temperate-zone Agricultural And Trade Policies," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(02), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Vink, N., 1992. "Expanding The Playing Field: South Africa, Southern Africa And The Role Of The Agricultural Economist," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(4), December.
    19. Giannakas, Konstantinos & Fulton, Murray, 2000. "The economics of coupled farm subsidies under costly and imperfect enforcement," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 75-90, January.
    20. Hillman, Jimmye S., 1996. "Nontariff Agricultural Trade Barriers Revisited," Working Papers 14602, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.