IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v69y1987i2p213-222..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Change in the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community

Author

Listed:
  • Carlisle Ford Runge
  • Harald von Witzke

Abstract

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Community (EC) is a complex institutional structure with major effects on world agriculture. This study analyzes the CAP from a public choice perspective as a case of induced institutional innovation. The demand for change is analyzed as a function of a newly enlarged Community. Time-consuming decisions, unequal distribution of net benefits, increasing budget expenditures, and rising pressures to "renationalize" farm subsidies drive the demand for change. Alternative institutional arrangements respond to these demands, which reflect preferences for fairness and equity as well as improved efficiency in the CAP.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlisle Ford Runge & Harald von Witzke, 1987. "Institutional Change in the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 213-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:69:y:1987:i:2:p:213-222.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1242271
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giannakas, Konstantinos & Fulton, Murray, 2000. "The economics of coupled farm subsidies under costly and imperfect enforcement," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 75-90, January.
    2. Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "International Public Goods, Export Subsidies, and the Harmonization of Environmental Regulations," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50876, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    3. Runge, C. Ford & Vande Kamp, Philip R., 1992. "Agricultural Policy Developments in the United States: 1991-93," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 60(03), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Jogeneel, Roel & Cronin, Evelien & Polman, Nico, 2018. "EU CAP 2014-2020 policy implementation choices: Is there a Member State typology?," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271967, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. D. MacLaren, 1992. "The Political Economy Of Agricultural Policy Reform In The European Community And Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 424-439, September.
    6. De Gorter, Harry & Swinnen, Jo, 1995. "The Political Economy and Institutional Determinants of Public Policy in Agriculture," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183390, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. J. Pokrivcak & H. de Goiter & J. F. M. Swinnen, 2001. "Does a “Restaurant Table Effect” Exist with the EU's Common Agricultural Policy? A Note," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 111-113, September.
    8. Runge, C. Ford, 1999. "Stream, River, Delta: Induced Innovation And Environmental Values In Economics And Policy," Working Papers 14465, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    9. Liu, Zong-Shin, 1989. "Monetary policy, exchange rate, and effects on US wheat trade and domestic market in an imperfect competition framework," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010216, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Livingston, Marie L. & Witzke, Harald von, 1989. "Transboundary Environmental Degradation and the Growing Demand for Institutional Innovation," 1989 Occasional Paper Series No. 5 197687, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Runge, C. Ford & von Witzke, Harald & Thompson, Shelley, 1987. "Liberal Agricultural Trade As A Public Good: Free Trade Versus Free Riding Under Gatt," Staff Papers 13635, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Franchino, Fabio, 1998. "Institutionalism and Commissions Executive Discretion: an Empirical Analysis," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 2, July.
    13. Vink, N., 1992. "Expanding The Playing Field: South Africa, Southern Africa And The Role Of The Agricultural Economist," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(4), December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:69:y:1987:i:2:p:213-222.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.