IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278690.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rural Enterprise Zones in Theory and Practice: An Assessment of Their Development Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Reeder, Richard J.

Abstract

State enterprise zone programs use tax incentives and other forms of assistance to encourage business development in distressed areas. Research suggests that enterprise zones have been fairly successful in generating jobs, and the cost per job created appears reasonable when compared with other job creation programs. Although enterprise zones may not be appropriate for all rural areas, most rural zones appear to be doing as well as or better than urban zones in creating jobs. Zone performance might be improved by screening out potentially unproductive zones, by providing more hands-on technical assistance, and by modifying program incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Reeder, Richard J., 1993. "Rural Enterprise Zones in Theory and Practice: An Assessment of Their Development Potential," Staff Reports 278690, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278690
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278690/files/ers-report-587.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Allan Wolf, 1990. "Enterprise Zones: A Decade of Diversity," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 4(1), pages 3-14, February.
    2. Newman, Robert J. & Sullivan, Dennis H., 1988. "Econometric analysis of business tax impacts on industrial location: What do we know, and how do we know it?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 215-234, March.
    3. Redman, John, 1992. "Federal Job Training for the Poor May Be More Cost Effective in Rural Areas," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 8(1), February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rural Economy Division, 1995. "Business Assistance and Rural Development," Staff Reports 278872, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Rural Economy Division, 1995. "Business Assistance and Rural Development," Staff Reports 278789, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Andrew M. Isserman, 1993. "State Economic Development Policy and Practice in the United States: A Survey Article," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 16(1-2), pages 49-100, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rural Economy Division, 1995. "Business Assistance and Rural Development," Staff Reports 278872, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Rural Economy Division, 1995. "Business Assistance and Rural Development," Staff Reports 278789, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Rainey, Daniel V. & McNamara, Kevin T., 2002. "Tax Incentives: An Effective Development Strategy For Rural Communities?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-7, August.
    4. Hernández-Murillo, Rubén, 2019. "Interjurisdictional competition with adverse selection," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-95.
    5. Anna Alberini, 2007. "Determinants And Effects On Property Values Of Participation In Voluntary Cleanup Programs: The Case Of Colorado," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(3), pages 415-432, July.
    6. Brian E. Whitacre & David Shideler & Randi Williams, 2016. "Do Incentive Programs Cause Growth? The Case of the Oklahoma Quality Jobs Program and Community-Level Economic Growth," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(1), pages 62-74, February.
    7. Ohad Raveh, 2013. "Dutch Disease, factor mobility, and the Alberta Effect: the case of federations," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 1317-1350, November.
    8. Anna Alberini & Dennis Guignet, 2008. "Voluntary Cleanups and Redevelopment Potential: Lessons from Baltimore, Maryland," Working Papers 2008.87, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Andrew M. Isserman, 1993. "State Economic Development Policy and Practice in the United States: A Survey Article," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 16(1-2), pages 49-100, April.
    10. Fabienne Boudier‐Bensebaa, 2005. "Agglomeration economies and location choice: Foreign direct investment in Hungary," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 13(4), pages 605-628, October.
    11. Cooray, Arusha & Tamazian, Artur & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2014. "What drives FDI policy liberalization? An empirical investigation," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 179-189.
    12. Kris Wernstedt & Peter B. Meyer & Anna Alberini, 2006. "Attracting private investment to contaminated properties: The value of public interventions," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 247-369.
    13. Anjum Aqeel & Mohammed Nishat, 2004. "The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 651-664.
    14. Hines, James R, Jr, 1996. "Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1076-1094, December.
    15. Dayton M. Lambert & Kevin T. McNamara, 2009. "Location determinants of food manufacturers in the United States, 2000–2004: are nonmetropolitan counties competitive?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(6), pages 617-630, November.
    16. Christopher J. O'Leary & Stephen A. Wandner (ed.), 1997. "Unemployment Insurance in the United States: Analysis of Polciy Issues," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number uius2, August.
    17. Fidel Perez-Sebastian & Ohad Raveh, 2016. "The Natural Resource Curse and Fiscal Decentralization," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(1), pages 212-230.
    18. Ulgado, Francis M., 1997. "Location decision-making characteristics of foreign direct investment in the United States," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 271-293, June.
    19. Paul Coomes & Dennis Olson & John Merchant, 1991. "Using a Metropolitan-area Econometric Model to Analyse Economic Development Proposals," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 369-382, June.
    20. William Hoyt & Christopher Jepsen & Kenneth Troske, 2009. "Business Incentives and Employment: What Incentives Work and Where?," Working Papers 2009-02, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.