IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/276221.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Before Implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act's Produce Rule: A Survey of U.S. Produce Growers

Author

Listed:
  • Astill, Gregory
  • Minor, Travis
  • Calvin, Linda
  • Thornsbury, Suzanne

Abstract

The 2011 Food Safety Modernization Act’s (FSMA) Produce Rule (PR)—formally known as the “Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human Consumption”—was the first on farm food safety regulation for produce to be consumed in the United States. It set specific disease-preventive requirements for produce that is sold and consumed raw. Teaming with U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) to conduct a two-part survey in 2015 and 2016, USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) asked U.S. produce growers about microbial food safety practices already in place before the PR’s implementation. This report presents survey descriptive statistics covering various food safety practices and measured costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Astill, Gregory & Minor, Travis & Calvin, Linda & Thornsbury, Suzanne, 2018. "Before Implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act's Produce Rule: A Survey of U.S. Produce Growers," Economic Information Bulletin 276221, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:276221
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276221/files/EIB-194.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Calvin, Linda & Jensen, Helen & Klonsky, Karen & Cook, Roberta, 2017. "Food Safety Practices and Costs Under the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement," Economic Information Bulletin 259719, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Ministry of Finance, Government of India,, 2016. "Economic Survey 2015-16," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199469284.
    3. Calvin, Linda, 2004. "Response to U.S. Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Associated with Imported Produce," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33647, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Todd M Schmit & Gretchen L Wall & Elizabeth J Newbold & Elizabeth A Bihn, 2020. "Assessing the costs and returns of on-farm food safety improvements: A survey of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) training participants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. John Bovay, 2023. "Food safety, reputation, and regulation," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 684-704, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferrier, Peyton M. & Zhen, Chen & Bovay, John, 2023. "Price and Welfare Effects of the Food Safety Modernization Act Produce Safety Rule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(1), January.
    2. Bovay, John & Ferrier, Peyton & Zhen, Chen, 2018. "Estimated Costs for Fruit and Vegetable Producers To Comply With the Food Safety Modernization Act’s Produce Rule," Economic Information Bulletin 276220, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Ana Maria Santacreu & Michael Sposi & Jing Zhang, 2021. "What Determines State Heterogeneity in Response to US Tariff Changes?," Working Papers 2021-007, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, revised 08 Mar 2023.
    4. Amjad, Rashid, 2017. "Remittances and Poverty: A Comparison of Bangladesh and Pakistan, 2000–2016," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 40(3-4), pages 75-104, Sep-Dec.
    5. Muhammad Ahsan Rana & Muhammad Nadeem Malik, 2021. "Friendly Fire: Wheat Subsidy in Punjab, Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 153-174.
    6. Omer Siddique & Hanzla Jalil, 2018. "Exploring the Structure and Performance of Petroleum Retail Outlets in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 57(2), pages 223-247.
    7. Mauro Vigani & Hasan Dudu & Gloria Solano-Hermosilla, 2019. "Estimation of food demand parameters in Ethiopia: A Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) approach," JRC Research Reports JRC117125, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Coady, David & Prady, Delphine, 2019. "Universal income in developing countries: Issues, options, and illustration for India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    9. Faiz Ur Rehman & Muhammad Nasir, 2018. "In the Same Boat, but not Equals: The Heterogeneous Effects of Indirect Taxation on Child Health in Punjab-Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2018:158, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    10. Grossman, Daniel & Khalil, Umair & Ray, Arijit, 2019. "Terrorism and early childhood health outcomes: Evidence from Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Sarah W. Adelman & Katherine N. Schmeiser, 2019. "Infant Formula Trade and Food Safety," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, January.
    12. Domenico Buccella & Augustine Abakpa, 2023. "Induced vs. Voluntary Green Production: Which Is Better for Society?," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 89-103.
    13. Nasir Iqbal & Saima Nawaz, 2017. "Spatial Differences and Socioeconomic Determinants of Health Poverty," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 221-248.
    14. Hussein Al-Zyoud & Walid Belassi, 2017. "Gender Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap: Rising Inequality in Alberta and Saskatchewan," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 1-64, February.
    15. Aabishkar Paudel & Sudip Poudel & Anup Sharma, 2021. "Comparative Study of Major Diseases of Major Summer Vegetables and Their Management Practices in Syangja, Nepal," Reviews in Food and Agriculture (RFNA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 54-58, April.
    16. Quandt, Amy, 2023. "“You have to be resilient”: Producer perspectives to navigating a changing agricultural system in California, USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    17. K L Krishna & Suresh Chand Aggarwal & Bishwanath Goldar & Deb Kusum Das & Abdul A Erumban & Pilu Chandra Das, 2018. "Trends and Patterns in Labour Quality in India at Sectoral Level," Working papers 285, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    18. Ghosh, Saibal, 2016. "Does mobile telephony spur growth? Evidence from Indian states," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1020-1031.
    19. Rustem Nureev & Vyacheslav Volchik & Wadim Strielkowski, 2020. "Neoliberal Reforms in Higher Education and the Import of Institutions," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Ishaq, Mazhir Nadeem & Xia, Li Cui & Rasheed, Rukhsana & Abdullah, Muhammad, 2017. "Market Decision Preferences Of Dairy Farmers Towards Traditional And Modern Channels Of Milk Marketing: An Evidence From Punjab Province Of Pakistan," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 5(3), July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:276221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.