Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

An Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Information Sources on Food Safety by using Fuzzy Pair-wise Comparison

Contents:

Author Info

  • Gunden, Cihat
  • Miran, Bulent
  • Uysal, Ozlem Karahan
  • Kenanog, Zerrin
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The main objective of this study is to measure consumer preferences for information sources on food safety along with the factors influencing the degree of consumer preferences in Turkey. The data were obtained from a survey of 385 consumers selected randomly in Izmir, Turkey. This study involves two-stage methodology. In the first stage, fuzzy pair-wise comparison was applied to calculate a measure of preferences. Five information sources on food safety, television programmes, doctors/experts, newspapers/journal articles, radio programmes and neighbors/friends were given to the consumers. The consumers were asked to make pair-wise comparisons among the information sources. The information source hierarchies of consumers were established and ranked from most to least importance. The results show that the most important information sources of consumers are “doctors/experts” and “television programmes”. The consumer preferences from the first stage were regressed upon the consumer specific variables by using seemingly unrelated regression in the second stage. The preferences for information sources are mainly influenced by education and level of income.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/6813
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Southern Agricultural Economics Association in its series 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas with number 6813.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ags:saeaed:6813

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.saea.org/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Akgungor, Sedef & Miran, Bulent & Abay, Canan, 2007. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Organic Products in Urban Turkey," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7872, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Schoney, Richard A. & Hayward, Keith A., 1986. "An Alternative Approach To The Evaluation Of Goal Hierarchies Among Farmers," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(01), July.
    3. Basarir, Aydin & Gillespie, Jeffrey M., 2003. "Goals Of Beef Cattle And Dairy Producers: A Comparison Of The Fuzzy Pair-Wise Method And Simple Ranking Procedure," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35163, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeaed:6813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.