IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aesc16/236363.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A farm level approach to explore economic trade offs of soil organic carbon management in Scottish crop farms

Author

Listed:
  • Shrestha, Shailesh
  • Glenk, Klaus

Abstract

This paper focuses on the economic trade-off space between effects on yield and input costs of management measures aimed at enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks to maintain soil fertility while providing important ecosystem services. An optimising dynamic farm level model, ScotFarm, was used to investigate the financial impacts of 4 SOC management measures (cover crops, zero tillage, minimum tillage and residue management) for three groups of Scottish crop farms. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to test the robustness of the model results on crop yields and costs of production for each measure. The results suggest that financially, tillage management is the only positive measure for Scottish farms at baseline levels of yield effects and input costs. Residue management is expected to have a negative impact on farm margins for the farms. The projected maximum positive financial impact was less than 10%. Results of the sensitivity analysis indicate that financial impacts of SOC management measures on farm margins are more sensitive to a change in crop yields than to changes in input costs. The findings point to further research needs with respect to the investigated trade-off space, and have implications for agricultural policy design aimed at enhancing SOC stocks under a changing climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Shrestha, Shailesh & Glenk, Klaus, 2016. "A farm level approach to explore economic trade offs of soil organic carbon management in Scottish crop farms," 90th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2016, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 236363, Agricultural Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesc16:236363
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.236363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/236363/files/Shailesh_Shrestha%20upload.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.236363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongli Feng & Catherine L. Kling, 2005. "The Consequences of Cobenefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 53(4), pages 461-476, December.
    2. H. Kahiluoto & P. Smith & D. Moran & J. E. Olesen, 2014. "Enabling food security by verifying agricultural carbon," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 309-311, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glenk, Klaus & Shrestha, Shailesh & Topp, Cairstiona F.E. & Sánchez, Berta & Iglesias, Ana & Dibari, Camilla & Merante, Paolo, 2017. "A farm level approach to explore farm gross margin effects of soil organic carbon management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 33-46.
    2. Neuman, Amber D. & Belcher, Ken W., 2011. "The contribution of carbon-based payments to wetland conservation compensation on agricultural landscapes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 75-81, January.
    3. Kovacs, Kent F. & Haight, Robert G. & Jung, Suhyun & Locke, Dexter H. & O'Neil-Dunne, Jarlath, 2013. "The marginal cost of carbon abatement from planting street trees in New York City," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Majeed, Fahd & Khanna, Madhu & Miao, Ruiqing & Blanc, Elena & Hudiburg, Tara & DeLucia, Evan, 2020. "Designing payments for GHG mitigation to induce low carbon bioenergy production," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304394, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Heberling, Matthew T. & García, Jorge H. & Thurston, Hale W., 2010. "Does encouraging the use of wetlands in water quality trading programs make economic sense?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1988-1994, August.
    6. Li, Zhi & Liu, Pengfei & Swallow, Stephen K., 2022. "The performance of multi-type environmental credit trading markets: Lab experiment evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Garnache, Cloe & Merel, Pierre R., 2012. "Carbon market policy design: Investigating the role of payments aggregation," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124960, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Rodríguez-Entrena, Macario & Espinosa-Goded, María & Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús, 2014. "The role of ancillary benefits on the value of agricultural soils carbon sequestration programmes: Evidence from a latent class approach to Andalusian olive groves," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-73.
    9. Mirja Mikkilä & Papitchaya Utanun & Jukka Luhas & Mika Horttanainen & Lassi Linnanen, 2021. "Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy—Feasibility of Recycled Nutrients for Biomass Production within a Pulp and Paper Integration in Indonesia, Southeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Alejandro Caparrós & Emilio Cerdá & Paola Ovando & Pablo Campos, 2010. "Carbon Sequestration with Reforestations and Biodiversity-scenic Values," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(1), pages 49-72, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries; Environmental Economics and Policy; Farm Management;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesc16:236363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.