IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlfba/196229.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Zeiteffizienz und Transparenz

In: Zeitgerechte Stadt: Konzepte und Perspektiven für die Planungspraxis

Author

Listed:
  • Henckel, Dietrich
  • Weber, Charlotte

Abstract

Wenn man Zeit als knappe Ressource sieht, erscheint die größtmögliche Transparenz über "Zeiten" als eine zentrale Voraussetzung, um autonom und informiert über das eigene Verhalten entscheiden zu können. Im Sinne der eigenen "Bewirtschaftung" der Zeit wäre Transparenz eine wesentliche Grundbedingung für (individuelle) Zeiteffizienz. Die Summe (potenzieller) individueller Zeiteffizienz könnte wiederum einen Beitrag auch zu einer kollektiven Zeiteffizienz leisten. Transparenz stellt sich allerdings nicht von alleine her, sondern muss "produziert" werden. Dies kann man entweder als öffentliche Aufgabe zur Herstellung gleicher Ausgangsbedingungen, als eine Voraussetzung für zeitliche Gerechtigkeit ansehen. Oder man kann Transparenz (Information) ihrerseits als knappes und damit marktfähiges Gut betrachten. Der Beitrag geht auf die Frage von Zeiteffizienz, die Reichweite und vor allem die Grenzen dieses Konzepts ein. In der Forschung und in der planenden Praxis spielt dieses Konzept explizit keine Rolle. Allerdings hat es implizit in alltäglichen planerischen Entscheidungen eine große Bedeutung. Mittlerweile gibt es eine Vielzahl von Instrumenten, um die Möglichkeiten für eine größere Zeiteffizienz zu erweitern. Ein wesentlicher Teil des Beitrages soll - anhand von Beispielen - einen Überblick über das Spektrum dieser Techniken geben.

Suggested Citation

  • Henckel, Dietrich & Weber, Charlotte, 2019. "Zeiteffizienz und Transparenz," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Henckel, Dietrich & Kramer, Caroline (ed.), Zeitgerechte Stadt: Konzepte und Perspektiven für die Planungspraxis, volume 9, pages 23-44, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:196229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/196229/1/1663410380.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alois Stutzer & Bruno S. Frey, 2008. "Stress that Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 110(2), pages 339-366, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Roberts & Karl Taylor, 2017. "Intra-household commuting choices and local labour markets," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(3), pages 734-757.
    2. Peter Bäckström & Erika Sandow & Olle Westerlund, 2016. "Commuting and timing of retirement," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 125-152, January.
    3. Mouratidis, Kostas & Ettema, Dick & Næss, Petter, 2019. "Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 306-320.
    4. Zuoxian Gan & Tao Feng & Min Yang, 2018. "Exploring the Effects of Car Ownership and Commuting on Subjective Well-Being: A Nationwide Questionnaire Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Dong, Han & Zhang, Jun & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2019. "Exploring, understanding, and modeling the reciprocal relation between leisure and subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 813-824.
    6. William A Pizer & Steven Sexton, 2019. "The Distributional Impacts of Energy Taxes," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(1), pages 104-123.
    7. Glenn Lyons & Kiron Chatterjee, 2007. "A Human Perspective on the Daily Commute: Costs, Benefits and Trade‐offs," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 181-198, July.
    8. Christopher Mackie & Conal Smith, 2015. "Conceptualizing Subjective Well-Being And Its Many Dimensions – Implications For Data Collection In Official Statistics And For Policy Relevance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 335-372, September.
    9. Welsch, Heinz & Ferreira, Susana, 2014. "Environment, Well-Being, and Experienced Preference," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 7(3-4), pages 205-239, December.
    10. Koen Decancq & Marc Fleurbaey & Erik Schokkaert, 2015. "Happiness, Equivalent Incomes and Respect for Individual Preferences," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82, pages 1082-1106, December.
    11. Ma, Liang & Ye, Runing, 2019. "Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 130-141.
    12. Dickerson, Andy & Hole, Arne Risa & Munford, Luke A., 2014. "The relationship between well-being and commuting revisited: Does the choice of methodology matter?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 321-329.
    13. Marta Lachowska, 2017. "Outside options and wages: What can we learn from subjective assessments?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 79-121, February.
    14. Mouratidis, Kostas, 2019. "Built environment and leisure satisfaction: The role of commute time, social interaction, and active travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Jacob, Nikita & Munford, Luke & Rice, Nigel & Roberts, Jennifer, 2019. "The disutility of commuting? The effect of gender and local labor markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 264-275.
    16. Brodeur, Abel & Cook, Nikolai & Wright, Taylor, 2021. "On the effects of COVID-19 safer-at-home policies on social distancing, car crashes and pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Lars Olsson & Tommy Gärling & Dick Ettema & Margareta Friman & Satoshi Fujii, 2013. "Happiness and Satisfaction with Work Commute," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 255-263, March.
    18. Christopher Ambrey & Christopher Fleming, 2014. "Public Greenspace and Life Satisfaction in Urban Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1290-1321, May.
    19. Bruno Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2014. "Economic Consequences of Mispredicting Utility," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 937-956, August.
    20. Wheatley, Daniel, 2014. "Travel-to-work and subjective well-being: A study of UK dual career households," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 187-196.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:196229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.