IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s1_38-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Newconnect in Comparison With Multilateral Trading Facilities in Europe: Irregularities in the Functioning of the Polish MTF Market

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Asyngier

    (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Introduction: It is hard to consider five years of the functioning of the NewConnect market explicitly successful. On the one hand, the market quotes an increase of quoted instruments which is unusual in other multilateral trading facilities. On the other hand, it does not result in quality improvement of this market. Low value of public offers, limited share liquidity and excessive number of penny stock companies discourage investors from investing in this market and inhibit its further development. Methodology and the purpose of research: An analysis of statistical data showing development of the NewConnect market will be presented in the article as well as its position in comparison with other multilateral trading facilities in Europe. It will help to achieve the goal of the article that is defining activity areas of the NewConnect market which inhibit its development. On the basis of organizational and legal solutions used by selected European markets, some actions will be indicated which could be implied by an organizer of the NewConnect market in order to eliminate its functioning problems. Results: MTFs are currently organized by regulated markets (it is defined by Directive 2004/39/WE of European Parliament and Council from 21 April 2004 on Markets in Financial Instruments - MiFID) in 15 European countries. Straight majority of markets function as MTF( Multilateral Trading Facilities) and only three as regulated markets(RM). An unquestionable leader of multilateral trading facilities in Europe is London’s AIM. Over a thousand of quoted companies are reflected in 40% of capitalization of European markets and generated turnover of their shares is over 56% (data from the end of 2012).

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Asyngier, 2013. "Newconnect in Comparison With Multilateral Trading Facilities in Europe: Irregularities in the Functioning of the Polish MTF Market," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s1_38-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S1_38-54.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Gomber & M. Gsell, 2006. "Catching Up with Technology - The Impact of Regulatory Changes on ECNs/MTFs and the Trading Venue Landscape in Europe," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 7(4), pages 535-558, December.
    2. Craig Doidge & G. Andrew Karolyi & Rene M. Stulz, 2007. "Has New York Become Less Competitive in Global Markets? Evaluating Foreign Listing Choices Over Time," NBER Working Papers 13079, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Arcot, Sridhar & Black, Julia & Owen, Geoffrey, 2007. "From local to global: the rise of AIM as a stock market for growing companies: a comprehensive report analysing the growth of AIM," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 23110, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thierry Foucault & Laurent Frésard, 2012. "Cross-Listing, Investment Sensitivity to Stock Price, and the Learning Hypothesis," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(11), pages 3305-3350.
    2. Sapovadia, Vrajlal & Madhani, Pankaj, 2015. "Corporate Governance and Disclosure Practices in India: MNC Subsidiaries versus Domestic Cross-Listed Firms," MPRA Paper 96043, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Kashefi Pour, Eilnaz & Lasfer, Meziane, 2013. "Why do companies delist voluntarily from the stock market?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 4850-4860.
    4. Jörg Rocholl, 2009. "Corporate Governance und Internationale Kapitalmärkte," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 114-123, February.
    5. Roscoe, Philip & Willman, Paul, 2021. "Flaunt the imperfections: information, entanglements and the regulation of London’s Alternative Investment Market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114480, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Joseph D. Piotroski & Suraj Srinivasan, 2008. "Regulation and Bonding: The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act and the Flow of International Listings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 383-425, May.
    7. Bianconi, Marcelo & Tan, Liang, 2010. "Cross-listing premium in the US and the UK destination," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 244-259, April.
    8. Ferreira, Miguel A. & Matos, Pedro, 2008. "The colors of investors' money: The role of institutional investors around the world," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 499-533, June.
    9. Cantillon, Estelle & Yin, Pai-Ling, 2011. "Competition between exchanges: A research agenda," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 329-336, May.
    10. Goergen, Marc & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "Contractual corporate governance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 166-182, June.
    11. Thomas O'Connor & Todd Mitton, 2008. "Investability and Firm Value," Economics Department Working Paper Series n1920508.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    12. Steen Thomsen & Frederik Vinten, 2014. "Delistings and the costs of governance: a study of European stock exchanges 1996–2004," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 793-833, August.
    13. Hans Degryse & Frank de Jong & Vincent van Kervel, 2015. "The Impact of Dark Trading and Visible Fragmentation on Market Quality," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1587-1622.
    14. Buckle, Mike & Chen, Jing & Guo, Qian & Li, Xiaoxi, 2023. "Does smile help detect the UK's price leadership change after MiFID?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 756-769.
    15. Degryse, H.A. & de Jong, F.C.J.M. & van Kervel, V.L., 2011. "The Impact of Dark and Visible Fragmentation on Market Quality (Replaces EBC Discussion Paper 2011-013)," Other publications TiSEM 3ff46941-c3ff-4ba4-9a5b-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Bianconi, Marcelo & Chen, Richard & Yoshino, Joe A., 2013. "Firm value, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and cross-listing in the U.S., Germany and Hong Kong destinations," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 25-44.
    17. Luigi Zingales, 2009. "The Future of Securities Regulation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 391-425, May.
    18. Joyce Hsieh & Chien-Chung Nieh, 2010. "An overview of Asian equity markets," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 24(2), pages 19-51, November.
    19. Kate Litvak, 2008. "The Long‐Term Effect of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act on Cross‐Listing Premia," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 875-920, November.
    20. Jan Bena, 2008. "The Effect of Credit Rationing on the Shape of the Competition-Innovation Relationship," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp377, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s1_38-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.