IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/15663_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

International trade and income distribution

In: The New Economics of Income Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • .

Abstract

In ‘International trade and income distribution’, we show that both rising demand for high-tech goods and increasing supply of low-tech goods tend to widen the gap between the wages of the skilled and of unskilled labour force. It seems that high (low) qualified labour force in the high-tech sectors of tradeables and of non-tradeables share common interests. Therefore, the structure of unions should be reorganized according to the principle of ‘high-tech’ vis-à-vis ‘low-tech’, not following the often used principle of industries. We find that globalization coming along as a stronger integration of the South into the goods markets of the North has negative effects on the income distribution of wages in the North: either the gap between the wages for skilled and for unskilled labour is widened (US scenario) or the rigidity of relative factor prices (Continental Europe scenario) renders part of unskilled labour jobless and hence causes inequality to increase as well. Notice also that the regime of rigid wages in the North reduces inequality in the South (in comparison to the free trade-flexible wages scenario). Terms of trade will be affected when countries bargain over tariff reductions: assuming the North has more bargaining power than the South, tariff reductions will concern in the first place low-tech goods. As a result, the relative price for skilled labour (in relation to unskilled labour) will increase. Given the substitutability in the production functions, the production of both goods will become more intensive in the use of unskilled labour. Whether the distribution of wage income will change in the North in favour of skilled labour and to the detriment of unskilled labour depends on the degree of homogeneity of the production function. For a large country, terms of trade gains will slow any rise in capital income shares. This in turn means that terms of trade effects will tend to mitigate the inequality effects of tariff liberalization. In the framework of a political economy/rent seeking model for the usage of different tax policy instruments such as tariffs and export subsidies, the effects of these instruments on income distribution/social welfare are ambiguous: the imposition of a (higher) import tariff on labour-intensive goods will reduce the Gini coefficient and hence the inequality of wages for skilled and unskilled labour, ceteris paribus. In the opposite case of an (unskilled) labour-abundant country, the imposition of import tariffs on skill-intensive goods will raise the Gini coefficient and hence the inequality of wages for skilled and unskilled labour, ceteris paribus. It is undisputed that export subsidies raise the incomes of the protected sector to the detriment of the unprotected sector. If the protected sector uses intensively (un-)skilled labour, the difference in the remuneration vis-à-vis unskilled labour will increase (decrease), ceteris paribus.

Suggested Citation

  • ., 2015. "International trade and income distribution," Chapters, in: The New Economics of Income Distribution, chapter 8, pages 181-218, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:15663_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781783472369.00014.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liedtke, Stephan, 2017. "Chinese energy investments in Europe: An analysis of policy drivers and approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 659-669.
    2. Ahmed, Saeed & Mahmood, Anzar & Hasan, Ahmad & Sidhu, Guftaar Ahmad Sardar & Butt, Muhammad Fasih Uddin, 2016. "A comparative review of China, India and Pakistan renewable energy sectors and sharing opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 216-225.
    3. Kshetri, Nir, 2017. "The evolution of the internet of things industry and market in China: An interplay of institutions, demands and supply," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 49-67.
    4. Piegeler, Monika & Röhl, Klaus-Heiner, 2015. "Gründungsförderung in Deutschland: Ein Aktionsplan gegen sinkende Gründerzahlen," IW policy papers 17/2015, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    5. Anciaes, Paulo & Jones, Peter, 2020. "Transport policy for liveability – Valuing the impacts on movement, place, and society," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 157-173.
    6. Deng, Na & He, Guansong & Gao, Yuan & Yang, Bin & Zhao, Jun & He, Shunming & Tian, Xue, 2017. "Comparative analysis of optimal operation strategies for district heating and cooling system based on design and actual load," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 577-588.
    7. Tuballa, Maria Lorena & Abundo, Michael Lochinvar, 2016. "A review of the development of Smart Grid technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 710-725.
    8. Oskar Szumski, 2016. "The Impact of a Sense of Online Privacy on the Development of the Consumer 3.0 Model (Wplyw postrzegania prywatnosci w sieci na ksztaltowanie modelu konsumenta 3.0 )," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(58), pages 74-86.
    9. Chen, Shang-Yu, 2016. "Using the sustainable modified TAM and TPB to analyze the effects of perceived green value on loyalty to a public bike system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 58-72.
    10. Hagerman, Shelly & Jaramillo, Paulina & Morgan, M. Granger, 2016. "Is rooftop solar PV at socket parity without subsidies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 84-94.
    11. Lijesen, Mark & Behrens, Christiaan, 2017. "The spatial scope of airline competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-13.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economics and Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:15663_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.