IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/indbez/246839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalisierungsperspektiven der Interessenvertretung von Solo-Selbstständigen
[The representation of interests of solo self-employed workers - perspectives of institutionalisation]

Author

Listed:
  • Abbenhardt, Lisa
  • Pongratz, Hans J.

Abstract

Mit der zunehmenden Bedeutung von Solo-Selbstständigkeit als Erwerbsform ist auch die Problematik ihrer unzureichenden sozialpolitischen Integration ins öffentliche Bewusstsein gerückt. Eine zentrale Herausforderung liegt darin, dass die Interessenvertretung für Solo-Selbstständige vorwiegend innerhalb beruflich strukturierter Verbändesysteme institutionalisiert ist. Auf der Grundlage von 30 Experteninterviews erfolgt in diesem Beitrag eine explorative Analyse dieser Vertretungssituation am Beispiel der Branchen Handwerk, Architektur, Journalismus und IT-Berufe. Der Vergleich der Verbändesysteme auf Grundlage theoretischer Differenzierungen von Schmitter und Streeck (1999) zeigt unterschiedliche Formen der Integration der Verbände und der Sichtbarkeit von Solo-Selbstständigen und ihrer Interessenlagen. Inwieweit Solo-Selbstständigkeit als spezifische Erwerbsform anerkannt wird, hängt von historisch entstandenen und in die jeweiligen Berufsbilder integrierten Normalvorstellungen von selbstständigem Erwerb ab. Demgegenüber fehlen kollektive erwerbspolitische Vorstellungen als Grundlage für die weitergehende Kooperation von Verbänden und für die Anpassung arbeits- und sozialpolitischer Institutionen.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbenhardt, Lisa & Pongratz, Hans J., 2019. "Institutionalisierungsperspektiven der Interessenvertretung von Solo-Selbstständigen [The representation of interests of solo self-employed workers - perspectives of institutionalisation]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 26(3), pages 253-277.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:246839
    DOI: 10.3224/indbez.v26i3.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/246839/1/indbez-v26i3-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3224/indbez.v26i3.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schulze Buschoff, Karin, 2004. "Neue Selbstständigkeit und wachsender Grenzbereich zwischen selbstständiger und abhängiger Erwerbsarbeit: Europäische Trends vor dem Hintergrund sozialpolitischer und arbeitsrechtlicher Entwicklungen," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2004-108, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Schmitter, Philippe C. & Streeck, Wolfgang, 1999. "The organization of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies," MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Schulze Buschoff, Karin, 2016. "Solo-Selbstständigkeit in Deutschland," WSI Policy Briefs 4, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    4. Fachinger, Uwe & Frankus, Anna, 2004. "Selbstständige im sozialen Abseits: Eine Konzeptstudie zur Verbesserung der sozialen Absicherung von Honorarlehrkräften und anderen versicherungspflichtigen Selbstständigen," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 113, number 113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenworthy, Lane, 2000. "Quantitative indicators of corporatism: A survey and assessment," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.
    3. Plehwe, Dieter & Schlögl, Matthias, 2014. "Europäische und zivilgesellschaftliche Hintergründe der euro(pa)skeptischen Partei Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)," Discussion Papers, Project Group Modes of Economic Governance SP III 2014-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. In Jun & Peter Sheldon, 2006. "Looking beyond the West? The Korea Employers' Federation and the Challenges of Membership Adhesion and Cohesion," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 17(1), pages 203-225, September.
    5. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Bögenhold, Dieter & Fachinger, Uwe, 2012. "Unternehmertum: Unterschiedliche Facetten selbstständiger Berufstätigkeit [Entrepreneurship: Diverse aspects of self-employment]," MPRA Paper 51459, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Schulze Buschoff, Karin, 2007. "Self-employment and social risk management: Comparing Germany and the United Kingdom," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2007-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Berndt Keller & Hartmut Seifert, 2005. "Atypical Employment and Flexicurity," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(3), pages 304-323.
    9. Adriana Bunea, 2015. "Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultations," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(2), pages 281-299, June.
    10. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," Post-Print hal-01019642, HAL.
    11. Joost Berkhout & Jan Beyers & Marcel Hanegraaff, 2023. "The Representative Potential of Interest Groups: Internal Voice in Post-Communist and Western European Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 50-64.
    12. Marta Martínez Matute & Pedro S. Martins, 2022. "How representative are social partners in Europe? The role of dissimilarity," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(4), pages 424-444, December.
    13. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Seeliger, Martin, 2017. "Die soziale Konstruktion organisierter Interessen: Gewerkschaftliche Positionsbildung auf europäischer Ebene," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 89, number 89.
    15. Plehwe, Dieter, 2022. "Reluctant transformers or reconsidering opposition to climate change mitigation? German think tanks between environmentalism and neoliberalism," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-1.
    16. Peter Sheldon & Louise Thornthwaite, 2004. "Business or Association? The Strategic Responses of Employer Associations to the Decentralisation of Bargaining in Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 15(1), pages 128-158, June.
    17. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8528 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Alexis Drach, 2023. "An Early Form of European Champions? Banking Clubs between European Integration and Global Banking (1960s-1990s)," Post-Print hal-04112324, HAL.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Caleb Goods & Bradon Ellem, 2023. "Employer associations: Climate change, power and politics," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(2), pages 481-503, May.
    22. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8528 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Ewald Engelen, 2004. "Problems of Descriptive Representation in Dutch Works Councils," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(3), pages 491-507, October.
    24. Pieter Bouwen, 2003. "The Democratic Legitimacy of Business Interest Representation in the European Union: Normative Implications of the Logic of Access," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2003_8, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    25. Peter Sheldon & Raoul Nacamulli & Francesco Paoletti & David E. Morgan, 2016. "Employer Association Responses to the Effects of Bargaining Decentralization in Australia and Italy: Seeking Explanations from Organizational Theory," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 160-191, March.
    26. Cornelia Woll, 2005. "The Difficult Organization of Business Interests. MEDEF and the Political Representation of French Firms," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01065609, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Interessenvertretung; Solo-Selbstständige; Berufs- und Wirtschaftsverbände; Gewerkschaften; Verbändesystem; Institutionalisierung; representation of interests; solo self-employed workers; occupational and trade associations; unions; associational systems; institutionalisation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J44 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Professional Labor Markets and Occupations
    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General
    • J80 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:246839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/indbez/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.