IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/ijrvet/182042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making processes among potential dropouts in vocational education and training and adult learning

Author

Listed:
  • Aarkrog, Vibe
  • Wahlgren, Bjarne
  • Larsen, Christian Hougaard
  • Mariager-Anderson, Kristina
  • Gottlieb, Susanne

Abstract

Context: Aiming at gaining knowledge about students' thoughts and actions in deciding to stay in or drop out of an educational programme, an empirical study was conducted on dropout among 18-24-year-old students in VET and basic general adult learning. Approach: In order to pursue this aim, the study combined two sets of data: weekly student surveys and interviews with these same students. While the surveys provide a weekly snapshot of the students' thoughts regarding the probability of them continuing in the programme, their satisfaction with the educational programme as a whole, the specific lessons they attend, and the atmosphere at the school, the interviews contribute with detailed descriptions of the students' thoughts on the same matters. Findings: Based on the students' answers over an eight-week period, it was possible to trace a graph illustrating changes in the students' attitudes. These graphs can be placed within four categories of development: the stable, the positive, the unstable, and the negative. The latter can furthermore be differentiated as reflecting a stable decline, a fluctuating decline, or a sudden decline. In the interviews, the aim was to elicit the individual students' thoughts and actions at the points when their graphs took a turn. Conclusions: The findings show that the students' thoughts and actions concern matters both inside and outside the school. Furthermore, seemingly trivial matters in the students' lives are shown to have a potentially decisive influence on the students' thoughts about staying in or dropping out of a programme. These findings confirm the importance of focusing on students' decision-making processes in research on dropout. However, further research is needed to increase understanding of processes leading to decisions to drop out of education, including the qualification of methods to capture these processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Aarkrog, Vibe & Wahlgren, Bjarne & Larsen, Christian Hougaard & Mariager-Anderson, Kristina & Gottlieb, Susanne, 2018. "Decision-making processes among potential dropouts in vocational education and training and adult learning," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 5(2), pages 111-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ijrvet:182042
    DOI: 10.13152/IJRVET.5.2.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/182042/1/IJRVET-5-2-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.13152/IJRVET.5.2.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Raymond G. & Krzystofiak, Frank J. & Meindl, James R. & Yousry, Abdalla M., 1989. "Cognitive style and decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 436-453, December.
    2. Cournoyer, Louis & Deschenaux, Frédéric, 2017. "Decision-making rationales among Quebec VET student aged 25 and older," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 4(3), pages 226-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani & Khulud Alanazi & Raghad Alotaibi & Najlaa Abdulrahman Alsubeeh & Tauseef Ahmad & Shafiul Haque, 2023. "Prevalence of Potential Dropout Thoughts and Their Influential Factors Among Saudi Medical Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O'Keefe, Robert M., 2016. "Experimental behavioural research in operational research: What we know and what we might come to know," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 899-907.
    2. Steul, Martina, 2006. "Does the framing of investment portfolios influence risk-taking behavior? Some experimental results," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 557-570, August.
    3. Jozef Bavolar, 2013. "Validation of the Adult Decision-Making Competence in Slovak students," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(3), pages 386-392, May.
    4. Herron, Eddward T. & Cornell, Robert M., 2021. "Creativity amidst standardization: Is creativity related to auditors’ recognition of and responses to fraud risk cues?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 314-326.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:6:p:739-751 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lu, Hsi-Peng & Yu, Huei-Ju & Lu, Simon S. K., 2001. "The effects of cognitive style and model type on DSS acceptance: An empirical study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 649-663, June.
    7. Sipos, Norbert & Lukovszki, Lívia & Rideg, András & Vörös, Zsófia, 2023. "A vállalkozói döntéshozatali logikák kognitív megközelítése [Entrepreneurial effectuation through the lens of cognitive processes]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 544-563.
    8. E. Cools & H. Van Den Broeck & D. Bouckenooghe, 2006. "The Cognitive Style Indicator: Development and validation of a new measurement instrument," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/379, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    9. Seyed Morsal Ghavami & Mohammad Taleai, 2017. "Towards a conceptual multi-agent-based framework to simulate the spatial group decision-making process," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 109-132, April.
    10. A. Azadeh & M. Khakestani & S. Motevali Haghighi & A. Arjmand & Z. Jiryaei Sharahi, 2017. "A unique intelligent algorithm for optimization of human reliability and decision styles: a large petrochemical plant," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1161-1176, November.
    11. Gerrit H. van Bruggen & Ale Smidts & Berend Wierenga, 1998. "Improving Decision Making by Means of a Marketing Decision Support System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 645-658, May.
    12. Lin, Nidthida & Wilden, Ralf & Chirico, Francesco & Ghasrodashti, Elahe & DeTienne, Dawn R., 2022. "Persist or let it go: Do rational entrepreneurs make decisions rationally?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    13. Fuming Jiang & Subramaniam Ananthram & Jizhong Li, 2018. "Global Mindset and Entry Mode Decisions: Moderating Roles of Managers’ Decision-Making Style and Managerial Experience," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 413-447, June.
    14. Silvia Raffaldi & Paola Iannello & Laura Vittani & Alessandro Antonietti, 2012. "Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace," SAGE Open, , vol. 2(2), pages 21582440124, May.
    15. Adrián Alacreu-Crespo & María C. Fuentes & Diana Abad-Tortosa & Irene Cano-Lopez & Esperanza González & Miguel à ngel Serrano, 2019. "Spanish validation of General Decision-Making Style scale: Sex invariance, sex differences and relationships with personality and coping styles," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(6), pages 739-751, November.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:386-392 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Althuizen, N.A.P. & Wierenga, B., 2003. "The Effectiveness of Case-Based Reasoning: An Application in Sales Promotions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-053-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Muneera Esa & Anuar Alias & Zulkiflee Samad, 2014. "Project Managers’ Cognitive Style in Decision Making: A Perspective from Construction Industry," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(2), pages 1-65, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ijrvet:182042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://vetnetsite.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.