IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/215488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Schlüsselfiguren: Raum als Gegenstand und Ressource des Wandels

Author

Listed:
  • Gailing, Ludger
  • Ibert, Oliver

Abstract

Die Rolle von Schlüsselfiguren in sozialräumlichen Wandlungsprozessen ist bislang noch kaum erforscht. Wie kann der von Praktikern immer wieder thematisierte entscheidende Beitrag von einzelnen Personen zu komplexen Prozessen des Wandels sozialwissenschaftlich erklärt werden? Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, aus verschiedenen disziplinären Zusammenhängen, vor allem den Politik- und Organisationswissenschaften, der Betriebswirtschaft und der Soziologie, Konzepte zu identifizieren, mit deren Hilfe Schlüsselfiguren definiert werden können und ihr Beitrag in Wandlungsprozessen begründet werden kann. Für die Typen „Leader“, „Intermediär“ und „Governance-Pionier“ wird in heuristischer Weise herausgearbeitet, inwiefern der Einfluss von Schlüsselfiguren auch damit erklärt werden kann, wie sie im Raum agieren und wie sie räumlich verteilte Ressourcen mobilisieren. Raum, so wird argumentiert, kann Gegenstand und Ressource in Prozessen des sozialen Wandels sein.

Suggested Citation

  • Gailing, Ludger & Ibert, Oliver, 2016. "Schlüsselfiguren: Raum als Gegenstand und Ressource des Wandels," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 74(5), pages 391-403.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:215488
    DOI: 10.1007/s13147-016-0426-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/215488/1/Schl%c3%bcsselfiguren_%20Raum%20als%20Gegenstand%20und%20Ressource%20des%20Wandels.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13147-016-0426-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jörg Sydow & Frank Lerch & Udo Staber, 2010. "Planning for Path Dependence? The Case of a Network in the Berlin‐Brandenburg Optics Cluster," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 86(2), pages 173-195, April.
    2. Gailing, Ludger & Röhring, Andreas, 2016. "Is it all about collaborative governance? Alternative ways of understanding the success of energy regions," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 237-245.
    3. Gailing, Ludger, 2014. "Kulturlandschaftspolitik: Die gesellschaftliche Konstituierung von Kulturlandschaft durch Institutionen und Governance," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 4, number 214660.
    4. Alvesson, Mats & Sveningsson, Stefan, 2003. "Managers Doing Leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane," Working Paper Series 2003/5, Lund University, Institute of Economic Research.
    5. Gernot Grabher & Oliver Ibert, 2006. "Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 251-271, June.
    6. Jörg Sydow & Frank Lerch & Udo Staber, 2010. "Planning for Path Dependence? The Case of a Network in the Berlin-Brandenburg Optics Cluster," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 86(2), pages 173-195, April.
    7. Robert Stimson & Roger R. Stough & Maria Salazar, 2009. "Leadership and Institutions in Regional Endogenous Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13246.
    8. Alon, Ilan & Higgins, James M., 2005. "Global leadership success through emotional and cultural intelligences," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 501-512.
    9. Matthew Cocks, 2013. "Conceptualizing the Role of Key Individuals in Urban Governance: Cases from the Economic Regeneration of Liverpool, UK," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 575-595, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Albers, Hans-Hermann & Suwala, Lech, 2020. "Räumliches Unternehmensengagement (Corporate Spatial Responsibility) und Ortsführung (Place Leadership) in Kleinstädten. Perspektiven für eine neue Ortsführung? Eine Zusammenführung von zwei Diskursen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 63-84.
    2. Eva Eichenauer & Ludger Gailing, 2022. "What Triggers Protest?—Understanding Local Conflict Dynamics in Renewable Energy Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Henning & Erik Stam & Rik Wenting, 2013. "Path Dependence Research in Regional Economic Development: Cacophony or Knowledge Accumulation?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1348-1362, September.
    2. Peng-Fei Li & Harald Bathelt & Jici Wang, 2012. "Network dynamics and cluster evolution: changing trajectories of the aluminium extrusion industry in Dali, China," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 127-155, January.
    3. Andy Pike & Andrew Cumbers & Stuart Dawley & Danny MacKinnon & Robert McMaster, 2015. "Doing evolution in economic geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1532, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2015.
    4. Puig, Francisco & Debón, Ana & Cantarero, Santiago & Marques, Helena, 2023. "Location, profitability, and international trade liberalization in European textile-clothing firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Stephan Manning & Cristiano Richter, 2023. "Upgrading against the odds: How peripheral regions can attract global lead firms," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Graf, Holger & Broekel, Tom, 2020. "A shot in the dark? Policy influence on cluster networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    7. Brett Anitra Gilbert & Yuanyuan Li & Andres Velez-Calle & Marcus Crews, 2020. "A theoretical model of values and behaviors that shape technology region emergence in developing contexts," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 179-191, June.
    8. Kudic, Muhamed & Pyka, Andreas & Sunder, Marco, 2013. "Network Formation: R&D Cooperation Propensity and Timing Among German Laser Source Manufacturers," IWH Discussion Papers 9/2013, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    9. Miörner, Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2016. "Paving the way for new regional industrial paths: Actors of change in Scania’s games industry," Papers in Innovation Studies 2016/19, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    10. Luciana Lazzeretti & Francesco Capone, 2017. "The transformation of the Prato industrial district: an organisational ecology analysis of the co-evolution of Italian and Chinese firms," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 135-158, January.
    11. Shengjun Zhu & Canfei He & Yi Zhou, 2015. "How to jump further? Path dependent and path breaking in an uneven industry space," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1524, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2015.
    12. Leonhard Dobusch & Elke Schüßler, 2013. "Theorizing path dependence: a review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(3), pages 617-647, June.
    13. Stephen Roper & James H. Love, 2018. "Knowledge context, learning and innovation: an integrating framework," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 339-364, April.
    14. Vissers Geert & Dankbaar Ben, 2013. "Path dependence and path plasticity: textile cities in the Netherlands," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 83-95, October.
    15. Johann Fortwengel & Arne Keller, 2020. "Agency in the face of path dependence: how organizations can regain scope for maneuver," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1169-1201, November.
    16. Dorota Leszczyńska, 2014. "L’impact de l’énergie relationnelle sur la trajectoire historique. Bilan 2007- 2013 des études d’un cluster," Working Papers 2014-277, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    17. Lukas Radwan & Sebastian Kinder, 2013. "Practising the Diffusion of Organizational Routines," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2442-2458, October.
    18. Manning, Stephan, 2013. "New Silicon Valleys or a new species? Commoditization of knowledge work and the rise of knowledge services clusters," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 379-390.
    19. Dorota Leszczyńska, 2014. "Historical Trajectory and Knowledge Embeddedness: A Case Study in the French Perfume Cluster," Working Papers 2014-268, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    20. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:215488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.