IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/povpop/v13y2021i3p293-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To care for or to accompany? Determining factors for an inclusive work environment in Community Social Services of Andalusia (Spain)

Author

Listed:
  • Auxiliadora González‐Portillo
  • Germán Jaraíz Arroyo

Abstract

This article, the result of a research and development project funded by the Spanish administration, analyzes the impact of the dynamics of social inclusion carried out by the Municipal Social Services Centers in the region of Andalusia (Spain). The research follows a qualitative methodology, centered on the analysis of normative, operative, and discursive dimensions. This research shows how the social intervention carried out in these centres is conditioned by two very different realities. On the one hand, there is a set of regulations that, from a theoretical point of view, is committed to social integration. On the other hand, a daily context with a high level of interferences and assistance demands that hinder a real labour activation and social integration. This situation generates great organisational pressure and conditions professional praxis. Several factors play a role in this situation: The ideas held by the people involved in the professional intervention, knowledge management, networking, and the relationship between client and professional. The study concludes that to reinforce the inclusive capacity of social services increasing the resources and number of professionals is not enough, focusing on the models of management and intervention in a collaborative fashion is also necessary. 作为西班牙政府出资的研发项目结果,本文分析了西班牙安达卢西亚地区市政社会服务中心(Municipal Social Services Centers)实施的社会包容服务动态所产生的影响。研究使用定性方法,聚焦于规范维度、运作维度和话语维度的分析。整体而言可以发现,日常社会干预必须在具有以下特征的情境下进行:统一性质的援助、社会活化机会少且干预程度高的场景、以及能产生巨大组织压力并削弱专业实践的额外要求。一些因素在该情境下发挥作用:参与专业干预的不同人士所持的观念、知识管理、人际关系网、以及客户和专业人士之间的关系。研究的结论认为,为加强社会服务的包容能力,仅增加资源和专业人士的数量是不够的,还需要以协作的方式聚焦于管理及干预模式。 Este artículo, fruto de un proyecto de I + D y financiado por la administración española, analiza el impacto de la dinámica de inclusión social llevada a cabo por los Centros Municipales de Servicios Sociales de la región de Andalucía (España). La investigación sigue una metodología cualitativa, centrada en el análisis de las dimensiones normativa, operativa y discursiva. De manera holística, se puede apreciar que la intervención social del día a día debe ser manejada en un contexto caracterizado por la asistencia de carácter integrador, escenarios con pocas posibilidades de activación social y un alto nivel de interferencia y demandas adicionales que generan grandes presión organizativa y compromiso con la praxis profesional. En esta situación intervienen varios factores: las ideas de las distintas personas que intervienen en la intervención profesional, la gestión del conocimiento, el networking y la relación cliente‐profesional. El estudio concluye que para reforzar la capacidad inclusiva de los servicios sociales no basta con incrementar los recursos y el número de profesionales, y también es necesario centrarse en los modelos de gestión e intervención de forma colaborativa.

Suggested Citation

  • Auxiliadora González‐Portillo & Germán Jaraíz Arroyo, 2021. "To care for or to accompany? Determining factors for an inclusive work environment in Community Social Services of Andalusia (Spain)," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 293-305, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:293-305
    DOI: 10.1002/pop4.320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.320
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pop4.320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Mulgan, 2006. "The Process of Social Innovation," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 145-162, April.
    2. Tritter, Jonathan Quetzal & McCallum, Alison, 2006. "The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 156-168, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Germán Jaraíz Arroyo & Auxiliadora González Portillo, 2020. "Focus on Weaknesses or Strengths? Determining Factors for an Inclusive and Relational Management in Public Community Social Service Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Wahl, Charlotte, 2013. "Swedish municipalities and public participation in the traffic planning process – Where do we stand?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 105-112.
    3. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Gianluca Misuraca & Clelia Colombo & Csaba Kucsera & Stephanie Carretero & Margherita Bacigalupo & Raluca Radescu, 2015. "ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment t," JRC Research Reports JRC97467, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Avelino, Flor & Wittmayer, Julia M. & Pel, Bonno & Weaver, Paul & Dumitru, Adina & Haxeltine, Alex & Kemp, René & Jørgensen, Michael S. & Bauler, Tom & Ruijsink, Saskia & O'Riordan, Tim, 2019. "Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 195-206.
    6. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    7. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Dobiášová, Karolína & Kotherová, Zuzana & Numerato, Dino, 2021. "Institutional reforms to strengthen patient and public involvement in the Czech Republic since 2014," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 582-586.
    9. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Anne Seneca Terkelsen & Christian Tolstrup Wester & Gabriel Gulis & Jørgen Jespersen & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen, 2022. "Co-Creation and Co-Production of Health Promoting Activities Addressing Older People—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Nitsch, Martina & Waldherr, Karin & Denk, Enrica & Griebler, Ursula & Marent, Benjamin & Forster, Rudolf, 2013. "Participation by different stakeholders in participatory evaluation of health promotion: A literature review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 42-54.
    12. Richard Peter Bailey & Suria Angit, 2022. "Conceptualising Inclusion and Participation in the Promotion of Healthy Lifestyles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    14. Tan, Wee-Liang & Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2021. "External impetus, co-production and grassroots innovations: The case of an innovation involving a language," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Gafar ALMHAMAD & Vilmos LAKATOS & Ali ALKERDI & Lama ALKHATIB, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship Research In The Middle East (Systematic Review)," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 7-15, July.
    16. Pratt, Bridget & Merritt, Maria & Hyder, Adnan A., 2016. "Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: A working model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 215-224.
    17. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Abu Bashar & Nishad Nawaz & Sitara Karim & Mahmood Asad Mohd. Ali & Habeeb Ur Rahiman & Md. Shabbir Alam, 2021. "Exploring the Role of Islamic Fintech in Combating the Aftershocks of COVID-19: The Open Social Innovation of the Islamic Financial System," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Svensson, Per G. & Hambrick, Marion E., 2019. "Exploring how external stakeholders shape social innovation in sport for development and peace," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 540-552.
    19. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    20. Antonio Baselice & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Maurizio Prosperi & Antonio Stasi & Antonio Lopolito, 2021. "Key Drivers of the Engagement of Farmers in Social Innovation for Marginalised Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:293-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-2858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.