IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v51y2004i1p117-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic ordering decisions with market choice flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Geunes
  • Zuo‐Jun Shen
  • H. Edwin Romeijn

Abstract

Standard approaches to classical inventory control problems treat satisfying a predefined demand level as a constraint. In many practical contexts, however, total demand is comprised of separate demands from different markets or customers. It is not always clear that constraining a producer to satisfy all markets is an optimal approach. Since the inventory‐related cost of an item depends on total demand volume, no clear method exists for determining a market's profitability a priori, based simply on per unit revenue and cost. Moreover, capacity constraints often limit a producer's ability to meet all demands. This paper presents models to address economic ordering decisions when a producer can choose whether to satisfy multiple markets. These models result in a set of nonlinear binary integer programming problems that, in the uncapacitated case, lend themselves to efficient solution due to their special structure. The capacitated versions can be cast as nonlinear knapsack problems, for which we propose a heuristic solution approach that is asymptotically optimal in the number of markets. The models generalize the classical EOQ and EPQ problems and lead to interesting optimization problems with intuitively appealing solution properties and interesting implications for inventory and pricing management. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Geunes & Zuo‐Jun Shen & H. Edwin Romeijn, 2004. "Economic ordering decisions with market choice flexibility," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(1), pages 117-136, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:51:y:2004:i:1:p:117-136
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.10109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10109
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.10109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Dobson, 1988. "Sensitivity of the EOQ Model to Parameter Estimates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 570-574, August.
    2. William L. Maxwell, 1964. "The scheduling of economic lot sizes," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 89-124, June.
    3. Meir J. Rosenblatt & Yale T. Herer & Ilan Hefter, 1998. "Note. An Acquisition Policy for a Single Item Multi-Supplier System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-2), pages 96-100, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenjun Ni & Jia Shu & Miao Song & Dachuan Xu & Kaike Zhang, 2021. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for Facility Location with General Facility Cost Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 86-104, January.
    2. Wei Huang & H. Edwin Romeijn & Joseph Geunes, 2005. "The continuous‐time single‐sourcing problem with capacity expansion opportunities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 193-211, April.
    3. Jia Shu & Chung-Piaw Teo & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2005. "Stochastic Transportation-Inventory Network Design Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 48-60, February.
    4. Dinçer Konur & Joseph Geunes, 2019. "Integrated districting, fleet composition, and inventory planning for a multi-retailer distribution system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 527-559, February.
    5. Shuang Chen & Joseph Geunes, 2013. "Optimal allocation of stock levels and stochastic customer demands to a capacitated resource," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 33-54, March.
    6. Wilco van den Heuvel & Semra Ağralı & Z. Caner Taşkın, 2023. "A Decomposition Algorithm for Single and Multiobjective Integrated Market Selection and Production Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1439-1453, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ventura, José A. & Bunn, Kevin A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Duan, Lisha, 2021. "A coordination mechanism for supplier selection and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand and finite production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    3. Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2007. "An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 982-994, March.
    4. Qi, Xiangtong, 2007. "Order splitting with multiple capacitated suppliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 421-432, April.
    5. Robert R. Inman & Philip C. Jones & Guillermo M. Gallego, 1991. "Economic lot scheduling of fully loaded processes with external setups," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 699-713, October.
    6. Bianchessi, N. & Mansini, R. & Speranza, M.G., 2014. "The distance constrained multiple vehicle traveling purchaser problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 73-87.
    7. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    8. Woo, Hong Seng & Saghiri, Soroosh, 2011. "Order assignment considering buyer, third-party logistics provider, and suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 144-152, April.
    9. Adeinat, Hamza & Ventura, José A., 2015. "Determining the retailer's replenishment policy considering multiple capacitated suppliers and price-sensitive demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 83-92.
    10. Ali Ekici & Baṣak Altan & Okan Örsan Özener, 2016. "Pricing decisions in a strategic single retailer/dual suppliers setting under order size constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1887-1898, April.
    11. Venegas, Bárbara B. & Ventura, José A., 2018. "A two-stage supply chain coordination mechanism considering price sensitive demand and quantity discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 524-533.
    12. Guillermo Gallego & Robin Roundy, 1992. "The economic lot scheduling problem with finite backorder costs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 729-739, August.
    13. Hojati, Mehran, 2004. "Bridging the gap between probabilistic and fuzzy-parameter EOQ models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 215-221, October.
    14. P. C. Geng & R. G. Vickson, 1988. "Two heuristics for the economic lot scheduling problem: An experimental study," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 605-617, August.
    15. Li, Xin & Ventura, José A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Kweon, Sang Jin & Hwang, Seong Wook, 2018. "An integrated acquisition policy for supplier selection and lot sizing considering total quantity discounts and a quality constraint," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 19-40.
    16. Mansini, Renata & Savelsbergh, Martin W.P. & Tocchella, Barbara, 2012. "The supplier selection problem with quantity discounts and truckload shipping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 445-455.
    17. J. Puerto & F.R. Fernández, 1998. "Pareto‐optimality in classical inventory problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 83-98, February.
    18. Rabta, Boualem, 2017. "Sensitivity analysis in inventory models by means of ergodicity coefficients," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 63-71.
    19. B.C. Giri & I. Moon & W.Y. Yun, 2003. "Scheduling economic lot sizes in deteriorating production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(6), pages 650-661, September.
    20. Gérard P. Cachon & A. Gürhan Kök, 2007. "Implementation of the Newsvendor Model with Clearance Pricing: How to (and How Not to) Estimate a Salvage Value," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 276-290, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:51:y:2004:i:1:p:117-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.