IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i13-14p2635-2643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prerequisites for safe intraoperative nursing care and teamwork—Operating theatre nurses’ perspectives: A qualitative interview study

Author

Listed:
  • Annika Sandelin
  • Sigridur Kalman
  • Birgitta Åkesdotter Gustafsson

Abstract

Aim To describe operating theatre nurses’ experience of preconditions for safe intraoperative nursing care and teamwork. Background Surgical interventions are often needed for patients’ well‐being and survival from health problems. Adequate information to professionals responsible within the surgical organisation is of importance for patient safety in connection to the surgery. The members in the surgical team need correct information about the patients’ health and planned care. The information is mainly transferred by computerised systems that do not necessarily provide all information needed. Method A qualitative descriptive design was chosen. Narrative interviews were carried out with 16 experienced operating theatre nurses in four different hospitals in rural and urban areas in Sweden. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The study complied with criteria to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Result Operating theatre nurses strived to get adequate information about the patients’ care, the surgical intervention and the equipment to be well prepared for intraoperative nursing care. The information from the computerised systems was described as fragmented and obliged the operating theatre nurses to demand a preoperative dialogue between the members of the surgical team. Professional collegial teamwork and committed leadership were considered to enhance patient safety. Conclusion From the operating theatre nurses’ perspective, prerequisites for intraoperative safe nursing care and teamwork depend upon a preoperative dialogue between the members in the surgical team for collegial teamwork, obtaining a reliable preoperative overall picture based on adequate information transfer, and the support of a committed first‐line manager. Relevance to clinical practice The operating theatre nurses need a reliable preoperative overall picture in advance, to be able to be well prepared for the patients’ surgery. The overall picture should be based on adequate data about the patients’ health status and needs, details about the surgical intervention and prescriptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Annika Sandelin & Sigridur Kalman & Birgitta Åkesdotter Gustafsson, 2019. "Prerequisites for safe intraoperative nursing care and teamwork—Operating theatre nurses’ perspectives: A qualitative interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2635-2643, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2635-2643
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14850
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catrine Björn & Magnus Lindberg & Dag Rissén, 2016. "Significant factors for work attractiveness and how these differ from the current work situation among operating department nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 109-116, January.
    2. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Antti Peltokorpi, 2011. "How do strategic decisions and operative practices affect operating room productivity?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 370-382, November.
    3. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    4. repec:ipg:wpaper:14 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    6. Rachuba, Sebastian & Imhoff, Lisa & Werners, Brigitte, 2022. "Tactical blueprints for surgical weeks – An integrated approach for operating rooms and intensive care units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 243-260.
    7. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Bernardetta Addis & Giuliana Carello & Andrea Grosso & Elena Tànfani, 2016. "Operating room scheduling and rescheduling: a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 206-232, June.
    9. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.
    10. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2019. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 78-93.
    11. F. Davarian & J. Behnamian, 2022. "Robust finite-horizon scheduling/rescheduling of operating rooms with elective and emergency surgeries under resource constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 625-641, December.
    12. Weiya Zhong & Yun Shi, 2018. "Two-stage no-wait hybrid flowshop scheduling with inter-stage flexibility," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 108-125, January.
    13. John Bowers, 2013. "Balancing operating theatre and bed capacity in a cardiothoracic centre," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 236-244, September.
    14. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C. & Saldanha, Rodney R. & Burke, Edmund K., 2015. "Surgical scheduling with simultaneous employment of specialised human resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 719-730.
    15. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    16. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Roshanaei, Vahid & Booth, Kyle E.C. & Aleman, Dionne M. & Urbach, David R. & Beck, J. Christopher, 2020. "Branch-and-check methods for multi-level operating room planning and scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Riise, Atle & Mannino, Carlo & Lamorgese, Leonardo, 2016. "Recursive logic-based Benders’ decomposition for multi-mode outpatient scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 719-728.
    19. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    20. Cappanera, Paola & Visintin, Filippo & Banditori, Carlo, 2014. "Comparing resource balancing criteria in master surgical scheduling: A combined optimisation-simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-196.
    21. Duma, Davide & Aringhieri, Roberto, 2019. "The management of non-elective patients: shared vs. dedicated policies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 199-212.
    22. Azar, Macarena & Carrasco, Rodrigo A. & Mondschein, Susana, 2022. "Dealing with uncertain surgery times in operating room scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 377-394.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2635-2643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.