IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v35y2018i1d10.1007_s10878-017-0155-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-stage no-wait hybrid flowshop scheduling with inter-stage flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Weiya Zhong

    (School of Management, Shanghai University)

  • Yun Shi

    (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

This paper addresses the performance of scheduling algorithms for a two-stage no-wait hybrid flowshop environment with inter-stage flexibility, where there exist several parallel machines at each stage. Each job, composed of two operations, must be processed from start to completion without any interruption either on or between the two stages. For each job, the total processing time of its two operations is fixed, and the stage-1 operation is divided into two sub-parts: an obligatory part and an optional part (which is to be determined by a solution), with a constraint that no optional part of a job can be processed in parallel with an idleness of any stage-2 machine. The objective is to minimize the makespan. We prove that even for the special case with only one machine at each stage, this problem is strongly NP-hard. For the case with one machine at stage 1 and m machines at stage 2, we propose two polynomial time approximation algorithms with worst case ratio of $$3-\frac{2}{m+1}$$ 3 - 2 m + 1 and $$2-\frac{1}{m+1}$$ 2 - 1 m + 1 , respectively. For the case with m machines at stage 1 and one machine at stage 2, we propose a polynomial time approximation algorithm with worst case ratio of 2. We also prove that all the worst case ratios are tight.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiya Zhong & Yun Shi, 2018. "Two-stage no-wait hybrid flowshop scheduling with inter-stage flexibility," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 108-125, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:35:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-017-0155-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-017-0155-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-017-0155-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-017-0155-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz, Rubén & Vázquez-Rodríguez, José Antonio, 2010. "The hybrid flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Chung-Yee Lee & T. C. E. Cheng & B. M. T. Lin, 1993. "Minimizing the Makespan in the 3-Machine Assembly-Type Flowshop Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 616-625, May.
    3. Nicholas G. Hall & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 1996. "A Survey of Machine Scheduling Problems with Blocking and No-Wait in Process," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 510-525, June.
    4. C. N. Potts & S. V. Sevast'janov & V. A. Strusevich & L. N. Van Wassenhove & C. M. Zwaneveld, 1995. "The Two-Stage Assembly Scheduling Problem: Complexity and Approximation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 346-355, April.
    5. Sriskandarajah, Chelliah & Ladet, Pierre, 1986. "Some no-wait shops scheduling problems: Complexity aspect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 424-438, March.
    6. Sriskandarajah, C., 1993. "Performance of scheduling algorithms for no-wait flowshops with parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 365-378, November.
    7. Sriskandarajah, C. & Sethi, S. P., 1989. "Scheduling algorithms for flexible flowshops: Worst and average case performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 143-160, November.
    8. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    9. C. A. Glass & J. N. D. Gupta & C. N. Potts, 1999. "Two-Machine No-Wait Flow Shop Scheduling with Missing Operations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 911-924, November.
    10. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bagchi, Tapan P. & Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2006. "A review of TSP based approaches for flowshop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 816-854, March.
    2. Sun, Xi & Morizawa, Kazuko & Nagasawa, Hiroyuki, 2003. "Powerful heuristics to minimize makespan in fixed, 3-machine, assembly-type flowshop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 498-516, May.
    3. Wang, Kai & Qin, Hu & Huang, Yun & Luo, Mengwen & Zhou, Lei, 2021. "Surgery scheduling in outpatient procedure centre with re-entrant patient flow and fuzzy service times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Sung, C.S. & Kim, Hyun Ah, 2008. "A two-stage multiple-machine assembly scheduling problem for minimizing sum of completion times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 1038-1048, June.
    5. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. George L. Vairaktarakis, 2003. "The Value of Resource Flexibility in the Resource-Constrained Job Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 718-732, June.
    7. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    8. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    9. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.
    11. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    12. Riise, Atle & Mannino, Carlo & Lamorgese, Leonardo, 2016. "Recursive logic-based Benders’ decomposition for multi-mode outpatient scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 719-728.
    13. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    14. Cappanera, Paola & Visintin, Filippo & Banditori, Carlo, 2014. "Comparing resource balancing criteria in master surgical scheduling: A combined optimisation-simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-196.
    15. Duma, Davide & Aringhieri, Roberto, 2019. "The management of non-elective patients: shared vs. dedicated policies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 199-212.
    16. Azar, Macarena & Carrasco, Rodrigo A. & Mondschein, Susana, 2022. "Dealing with uncertain surgery times in operating room scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 377-394.
    17. Sung, Chang Sup & Juhn, Jaeho, 2009. "Makespan minimization for a 2-stage assembly scheduling problem subject to component available time constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 392-401, June.
    18. Sheikh, Shaya & Komaki, G.M. & Kayvanfar, Vahid & Teymourian, Ehsan, 2019. "Multi-Stage assembly flow shop with setup time and release time," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    19. Guido, Rosita & Groccia, Maria Carmela & Conforti, Domenico, 2018. "An efficient matheuristic for offline patient-to-bed assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 486-503.
    20. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2007. "A note on the two-stage assembly flow shop scheduling problem with uniform parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 945-951, October.
    21. Smutnicki, Czeslaw & Pempera, Jaroslaw & Bocewicz, Grzegorz & Banaszak, Zbigniew, 2022. "Cyclic flow-shop scheduling with no-wait constraints and missing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 39-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:35:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-017-0155-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.