IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1327-e1343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed methods thematic review: Health‐related decision‐making by the older person

Author

Listed:
  • Lindy King
  • Ann Harrington
  • Ecushla Linedale
  • Elizabeth Tanner

Abstract

Aims and objectives To undertake a mixed methods thematic literature review that explored how elderly adults approached decision‐making in regard to their health care following discharge. Background A critical time for appropriate health decisions occurs during hospital discharge planning with nursing staff. However, little is known how the 89% of elderly living at home make decisions regarding their health care. Research into older adults’ management of chronic conditions emerges as an important step to potentially encourage symptom monitoring, prevent missed care and detect deterioration. All should reduce the risk of hospital re‐admission. Design A mixed methods thematic literature review was undertaken. The structure followed the PRISMA reporting guidelines for systematic reviews recommended by the EQUATOR network. Methods PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Scopus online databases were searched using keywords, inclusion and exclusion criteria. References drawn from relevant publications, identified by experts and published between 1995 and 2017 were also considered. Twenty‐five qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies and reviews were critically appraised (CASP 2013) before inclusion in the review. Analysis of each study's findings was undertaken using Braun and Clarke's (2006) steps to identify major themes and sub‐themes. Results Four main themes associated with health‐related decision‐making in the elderly were identified: “the importance of maintaining independence,” “decision making style,” “management of conditions at home” and “discharge planning.” Conclusion Health care decision preferences in the elderly emerged as highly complex and influenced by multiple factors. Development of a tool to assess these components has been recommended. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses play a vital role in exploring and understanding the influence that maintaining independence has with each patient. This understanding provides an initial step toward development of a tool to assist collaboration between patients and healthcare professionals involved in their care.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindy King & Ann Harrington & Ecushla Linedale & Elizabeth Tanner, 2018. "A mixed methods thematic review: Health‐related decision‐making by the older person," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1327-1343, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1327-e1343
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14261
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dagrunn N Dyrstad & Kristin A Laugaland & Marianne Storm, 2015. "An observational study of older patients’ participation in hospital admission and discharge – exploring patient and next of kin perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1693-1706, June.
    2. Pamela L. Hudak & Richard M. Frankel & Clarence Braddock III & Rosane Nisenbaum & Paola Luca & Caitlin McKeever & Wendy Levinson, 2008. "Do Patients' Communication Behaviors Provide Insight into Their Preferences for Participation in Decision Making?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(3), pages 385-393, May.
    3. Commission, Productivity, 2011. "Caring for older Australians," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Necmi Avkiran & Alan McCrystal, 2014. "Intertemporal analysis of organizational productivity in residential aged care networks: scenario analyses for setting policy targets," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 113-125, June.
    2. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Connelly, Luke Brian, 2014. "The effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: Results from a multinomial endogenous treatment model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 115-122.
    3. Burgess, Teresa & Braunack-Mayer, Annette & Crawford, Gregory B. & Beilby, Justin, 2014. "Australian health policy and end of life care for people with chronic disease: An analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 60-67.
    4. Travers, Max & Liu, Edgar & Cook, Peta & Osborne, Caroline & Jacobs, Keith & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Dwyer, Zack, 2022. "Business models, consumer experiences and regulation of retirement villages," SocArXiv mb2vp, Center for Open Science.
    5. Kate M. Gunn & Julie Luker & Rama Ramanathan & Xiomara Skrabal Ross & Amanda Hutchinson & Elisabeth Huynh & Ian Olver, 2021. "Choosing and Managing Aged Care Services from Afar: What Matters to Australian Long-Distance Care Givers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Alice Tran & Kim-Huong Nguyen & Len Gray & Tracy Comans, 2019. "A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Margaret Adams & Glenn Gardner & Patsy Yates, 2017. "Investigating nurse practitioners in the private sector: a theoretically informed research protocol," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1608-1620, June.
    8. Ingrid Nyborg & Lars J Danbolt & Marit Kirkevold, 2017. "User participation is a family matter: A multiple case study of the experiences of older, hospitalised people and their relatives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4353-4363, December.
    9. Genevieve Knight & Zhang Wei, 2015. "Isolating the Determinants of Temporary Agency Worker Use by Firms: An Analysis of Temporary Agency Workers in Australian Aged Care," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 18(2), pages 205-237.
    10. Prosser, Brenton & Davey, Rachel & Gibson, Diane, 2015. "Progress in centralised ethics review processes: Implications for multi-site health evaluations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 117-123.
    11. Michael Woods & Grant Corderoy, 2021. "Improving Consumer‐Centred Aged Care: Addressing Issues of Sustainability, Service Integration and Market Incentives," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 54(2), pages 266-274, June.
    12. Temitope Olasunkanmi‐Alimi & Kristin Natalier & Monique Mulholland, 2022. "Everyday racism and the denial of migrant African women’s good caring in aged care work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1082-1094, July.
    13. Huw Brokensha & Andrew Taylor & Tony Barnes, 2017. "Changing Australia’s Age Pension Qualification Age: Modelling Differential Effects by Race," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(2), pages 203-229, April.
    14. Therese Jefferson & Siobhan Austen & Rhonda Sharp & Rachel Ong & Gill Lewin & Valerie Adams, 2014. "Mixed-methods research: What’s in it for economists?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 290-305, June.
    15. Moore, Corey B., 2021. "Consumer directed care aged care reforms in Australia since 2009: A retrospective policy analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 577-581.
    16. Shang Wu & Hazel Bateman & Ralph Stevens & Susan Thorp, 2022. "Flexible insurance for long‐term care: A study of stated preferences," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 823-858, September.
    17. Valerija Rogelj & David Bogataj & Marija Bogataj & Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín & Eneja Drobež, 2023. "The Role of Housing in Sustainable European Long-Term Care Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    18. Belinda Jessup & Tony Barnett & Kehinde Obamiro & Merylin Cross & Edwin Mseke, 2021. "Review of the Health, Welfare and Care Workforce in Tasmania, Australia: 2011–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Simon Eckermann & Lyn Phillipson & Richard Fleming, 2019. "Re-design of Aged Care Environments is Key to Improved Care Quality and Cost Effective Reform of Aged and Health System Care," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 127-130, April.
    20. Peta Harbour & Laurie Grealish, 2018. "Health literacy of the baby boomer generation and the implications for nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3472-3481, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1327-e1343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.