IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13000-d698674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing and Managing Aged Care Services from Afar: What Matters to Australian Long-Distance Care Givers

Author

Listed:
  • Kate M. Gunn

    (Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Julie Luker

    (Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Rama Ramanathan

    (Commission on Excellence and Innovation in Health, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Xiomara Skrabal Ross

    (Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Amanda Hutchinson

    (Justice and Society, University of South Australia, Magill, SA 5072, Australia)

  • Elisabeth Huynh

    (Department of Health Services Research & Policy, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Ian Olver

    (School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

Abstract

This research aims to identify the factors that influence caregivers’ decisions about the aged care providers they select for their elder relatives when caring from a distance and what they value once they have engaged a service. Adult long-distance carers for older relatives living within Australia were purposively sampled and they participated in audio-recorded interviews. A thematic analysis was employed to investigate the data. A sample of 13 participants enabled data saturation with no new major themes identified in the final three interviews. Participants were 50 to 65 years (Mean = 59.8) and mostly (77%) female. Four themes emerged relating to selection of care providers: (1) availability of care, (2) financial arrangements, (3) proximity and location, and (4) reputation of care provider. Five themes detailed valued qualities of care: (1) vigilant monitoring and responsivity, (2) communication with family, (3) flexibility and proactiveness of care, (4) staffing, and (5) access to appropriate and holistic care to maintain wellbeing. Long-distance caregivers face barriers in selecting and managing aged care services from afar within a complex Australian aged care system. They strongly value regular, proactive communication about the wellbeing of their relatives and may be particular beneficiaries of communication and assistive monitoring technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate M. Gunn & Julie Luker & Rama Ramanathan & Xiomara Skrabal Ross & Amanda Hutchinson & Elisabeth Huynh & Ian Olver, 2021. "Choosing and Managing Aged Care Services from Afar: What Matters to Australian Long-Distance Care Givers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13000-:d:698674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13000/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13000/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Commission, Productivity, 2011. "Caring for older Australians," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bei, Eva & Morrison, Val & Zarzycki, Mikołaj & Vilchinsky, Noa, 2023. "Barriers, facilitators, and motives to provide distance care, and the consequences for distance caregivers: A mixed-methods systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Necmi Avkiran & Alan McCrystal, 2014. "Intertemporal analysis of organizational productivity in residential aged care networks: scenario analyses for setting policy targets," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 113-125, June.
    2. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Connelly, Luke Brian, 2014. "The effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: Results from a multinomial endogenous treatment model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 115-122.
    3. Burgess, Teresa & Braunack-Mayer, Annette & Crawford, Gregory B. & Beilby, Justin, 2014. "Australian health policy and end of life care for people with chronic disease: An analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 60-67.
    4. Lindy King & Ann Harrington & Ecushla Linedale & Elizabeth Tanner, 2018. "A mixed methods thematic review: Health‐related decision‐making by the older person," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1327-1343, April.
    5. Travers, Max & Liu, Edgar & Cook, Peta & Osborne, Caroline & Jacobs, Keith & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Dwyer, Zack, 2022. "Business models, consumer experiences and regulation of retirement villages," SocArXiv mb2vp, Center for Open Science.
    6. Alice Tran & Kim-Huong Nguyen & Len Gray & Tracy Comans, 2019. "A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Margaret Adams & Glenn Gardner & Patsy Yates, 2017. "Investigating nurse practitioners in the private sector: a theoretically informed research protocol," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1608-1620, June.
    8. Genevieve Knight & Zhang Wei, 2015. "Isolating the Determinants of Temporary Agency Worker Use by Firms: An Analysis of Temporary Agency Workers in Australian Aged Care," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 18(2), pages 205-237.
    9. Prosser, Brenton & Davey, Rachel & Gibson, Diane, 2015. "Progress in centralised ethics review processes: Implications for multi-site health evaluations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 117-123.
    10. Michael Woods & Grant Corderoy, 2021. "Improving Consumer‐Centred Aged Care: Addressing Issues of Sustainability, Service Integration and Market Incentives," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 54(2), pages 266-274, June.
    11. Temitope Olasunkanmi‐Alimi & Kristin Natalier & Monique Mulholland, 2022. "Everyday racism and the denial of migrant African women’s good caring in aged care work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1082-1094, July.
    12. Huw Brokensha & Andrew Taylor & Tony Barnes, 2017. "Changing Australia’s Age Pension Qualification Age: Modelling Differential Effects by Race," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(2), pages 203-229, April.
    13. Therese Jefferson & Siobhan Austen & Rhonda Sharp & Rachel Ong & Gill Lewin & Valerie Adams, 2014. "Mixed-methods research: What’s in it for economists?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 290-305, June.
    14. Moore, Corey B., 2021. "Consumer directed care aged care reforms in Australia since 2009: A retrospective policy analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 577-581.
    15. Shang Wu & Hazel Bateman & Ralph Stevens & Susan Thorp, 2022. "Flexible insurance for long‐term care: A study of stated preferences," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 823-858, September.
    16. Valerija Rogelj & David Bogataj & Marija Bogataj & Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín & Eneja Drobež, 2023. "The Role of Housing in Sustainable European Long-Term Care Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    17. Belinda Jessup & Tony Barnett & Kehinde Obamiro & Merylin Cross & Edwin Mseke, 2021. "Review of the Health, Welfare and Care Workforce in Tasmania, Australia: 2011–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Simon Eckermann & Lyn Phillipson & Richard Fleming, 2019. "Re-design of Aged Care Environments is Key to Improved Care Quality and Cost Effective Reform of Aged and Health System Care," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 127-130, April.
    19. Peta Harbour & Laurie Grealish, 2018. "Health literacy of the baby boomer generation and the implications for nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3472-3481, October.
    20. Mijanur Rahman & Jimmy T. Efird & Hal Kendig & Julie E. Byles, 2019. "Patterns of home and community care use among older participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Health," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 293-303, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13000-:d:698674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.