IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i17-18p2493-2499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population‐specific Mini Nutritional Assessment can improve mortality‐risk‐predicting ability in institutionalised older Taiwanese

Author

Listed:
  • Alan C Tsai
  • Pei‐Yu Ku
  • Jeng‐Dau Tsai

Abstract

Aim and objectives. The study determined whether a new version of the Mini Nutritional Assessment that adopted population‐specific anthropometric cut‐points would improve the mortality‐predicting ability in institutionalised Taiwanese older people. Background. Routine screening is the key for detecting emerging malnutrition, but the tool must be simple, reliable and easy‐to‐use to be well accepted. The Mini Nutritional Assessment can meet these requirements, but for non‐Western populations, modifications based on anthropometric considerations are needed. Design. The study purposively sampled 208 residents, aged >65 years, of a long‐term care institution in Central Taiwan. Subjects were free of acute infection/disease and able to communicate. A university human‐subject‐study ethics committee approved the protocol. Methods. The study included biochemical measurements and a structured questionnaire for eliciting personal data and answers to questions in the Mini Nutritional Assessment. Follow‐up survival/mortality was tracked for two consecutive six‐month periods and analysed according to nutritional statuses graded with the original or a modified Mini Nutritional Assessment. The modified version adopted population‐specific anthropometric cut‐points and was without body mass index. Results. The modification improved the mortality‐predictive ability. Mortality rates for the first six months were 8·7, 3·9 and 0% according to the original Mini Nutritional Assessment and 10·6, 3·4 and 0% according to the modified version for subjects rated malnourished, at risk of malnutrition and normal, respectively. The mortality‐predictive ability of both versions weakened after six months. Conclusion. Both versions can predict follow‐up mortality, but the modified version has improved ability. For best results, the tool should be applied every six months or less (shorter for more frail older people) to screen for new cases of at‐risk individuals. Relevance to clinical practice. The Mini Nutritional Assessment that adopts population‐specific anthropometric cut‐points may have improved nutritional‐risk and mortality‐risk predictive abilities. The tool can help care‐workers detect emerging nutritional problems and enable timely intervention. Routine use of the tool may help improve the quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan C Tsai & Pei‐Yu Ku & Jeng‐Dau Tsai, 2010. "Population‐specific Mini Nutritional Assessment can improve mortality‐risk‐predicting ability in institutionalised older Taiwanese," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2493-2499, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2493-2499
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03299.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03299.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03299.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Segovia, Jorge & Bartlett, Roy F. & Edwards, Alison C., 1989. "An empirical analysis of the dimensions of health status measures," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 761-768, January.
    2. McCallum, J. & Shadbolt, B. & Wang, D., 1994. "Self-rated health and survival: A 7-year follow-up study of Australian elderly," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(7), pages 1100-1105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deanna L. Williamson & Janet E. Fast, 1998. "Poverty Status, Health Behaviours, and Health: Implications for Social Assistance and Health Care Policy," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Manoj K. Pandey, 2013. "Elderly's Health Shocks and Household's Ex-ante Poverty in India," ASARC Working Papers 2013-01, The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
    3. Vincent Hildebrand & Philippe Kerm, 2009. "Income inequality and self-rated health status: Evidence from the european community household panel," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(4), pages 805-825, November.
    4. Min Zhou & Wei Guo, 2023. "Self-rated Health and Objective Health Status Among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China: A Healthy Housing Perspective," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Buckley, Neil J. & Denton, Frank T. & Leslie Robb, A. & Spencer, Byron G., 2004. "The transition from good to poor health: an econometric study of the older population," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 1013-1034, September.
    6. Ronchetti, Jérôme & Terriau, Anthony, 2021. "Help me quit smoking but don't make me sick! The controversial effects of electronic cigarettes on tobacco smokers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    7. Simon Jean-Baptiste Combes & Nathalie Simonnot & Fabienne Azzedine & Abdessamad Aznague & Pierre Chauvin, 2019. "Self-Perceived Health among Migrants Seen in Médecins du Monde Free Clinics in Europe: Impact of Length of Stay and Wealth of Country of Origin on Migrants’ Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Maria Alessandra Antonelli & Giorgia Marini, 2023. "Good health with good institutions. An empirical analysis for italian regions," Public Finance Research Papers 61, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    9. Cai, Lixin, 2010. "The relationship between health and labour force participation: Evidence from a panel data simultaneous equation model," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 77-90, January.
    10. Artazcoz, Lucia & Cortès, Imma & Borrell, Carme & Escribà-Agüir, Vicenta & Cascant, Lorena, 2011. "Social inequalities in the association between partner/marital status and health among workers in Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 600-607, February.
    11. Albertini, Julien & Fairise, Xavier & Terriau, Anthony, 2021. "Health, wealth, and informality over the life cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Jia Ryu & Yeogyeong Yoon & Hyunjoo Kim & Chung Won Kang & Kyunghee Jung-Choi, 2018. "The Change of Self-Rated Health According to Working Hours for Two Years by Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Chen, Linkun & Clarke, Philip M. & Petrie, Dennis J. & Staub, Kevin E., 2021. "The effects of self-assessed health: Dealing with and understanding misclassification bias," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    14. Young-Ho Khang & Hye Kim, 2010. "Self-rated health and mortality: gender- and age-specific contributions of explanatory factors in South Korea," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(4), pages 279-289, August.
    15. William M Reichmann & Jeffrey N Katz & Elena Losina, 2011. "Differences in Self-Reported Health in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-7, February.
    16. Lazarevič, Patrick & Brandt, Martina, 2020. "Diverging ideas of health? Comparing the basis of health ratings across gender, age, and country," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    17. Michael G Trotter & Tristan J. Coulter & Paul A Davis & Dylan R Poulus & Remco Polman, 2020. "The Association between Esports Participation, Health and Physical Activity Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Emmanuelle Piérard, 2016. "The effect of health care expenditures on self-rated health status and the Health Utility Index: Evidence from Canada," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Lixin Cai & Guyonne Kalb, 2007. "Health status and labour force status of older working-age Australian men," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 10(4), pages 227-252.
    20. Ann Berry & Mary Katras & Yoshie Sano & Jaerim Lee & Jean Bauer, 2008. "Job Volatility of Rural, Low-income Mothers: A Mixed Methods Approach," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 5-22, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2493-2499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.